medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista del Hospital Juárez de México

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2001, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hosp Jua Mex 2001; 68 (4)

Función renal posterior a la nefrectomía en el donador vivo

Carazo PMM, Bazán BA, González GAF, Espinoza R, Paz SP
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 159-162
PDF size: 52.29 Kb.


Key words:

Kidney functioning, nephrectomy, living donor, kidney transplantation, creatinine, ureic nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance, urea.

ABSTRACT

It is generally accepted that complications after nephrectomy in the donor for renal transplantation exist. Mortality is less than 0.3% and morbidity can account for up to 8.2%. The purpose of this article is to study the morbidity causes and to acknowledge renal function after the procedure.
We studied 25 patients from Hospital Juárez in Mexico City to determine renal function pre and post-transplant. This was achieved determining creatinine, BUN, urea, and creatinine clearance tests. Our results show that renal function is maintained within normal parameters. The donor patients do not suffer major morbidity or renal dysfunction.


REFERENCES

  1. Jonson EM y col. Living kidney donation: Donors risks and quality of life. Clin Transpl 1997; 231-40.

  2. Taghavi R. Does kidney donation threaten the quality of life of the donor. Transplant Proc 1995; 27(5): 2595-6.

  3. Ottelin MC y col. Review of 333 living donor nephrectomies. Soutn Med J 1994; 87(1): 61-4.

  4. Najarian JS y col. Twenty years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet 1992; 340 (8823): 897-910.

  5. Waples MJ y col. Living donor nephrectomy. A 20 years experience. Urology 1995; 45(2): 207-10.

  6. Duque JL y col. Morbidity of flank incision for renal donors. Urology 1999; 54(5): 796-801.

  7. Johnson EM y col. Long-term follow-up of living kidney donors: Quality of life after donation. Transplantation 1999; 67(5): 717-21.

  8. Fehrman-Ekholmi y col. Kidney donors live longer. Transplantation 1997; 64(7): 976-8.

  9. Kasiske BL, Bia MJ. The evaluation and selection of living kidney donors. Am J Kidney Dis 1996; 26(2): 387-98.

  10. Johnson EM y col. Complications and risks nephrectomy. Transplantation 1997; 64(8): 1124-8.

  11. Ringden O y col. Living related kidney donors: Complications and long-term renal function. Transplantation 1978; 25(4): 221-3.

  12. Shafferd D y col. Two hundred one consecutive living-donor nephrectomies. Arch Surg 1998; 133(4): 426-31.

  13. Blohme I y col. The living donor in renal transplantation. Scand J Urol Nephrol Sppl. 1981; 64: 143-51.

  14. Hilton BA, Starzomski RC. Family decision making about living related kidney donation. Anna J 1994; 21(6): 346-54.

  15. Saski TM y col. Is laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criteria standard? Arch Surg 2000; 135(8): 943-7.

  16. Santiago-Delpin EA, Ruiz Speare JO. Trasplante de órganos. 2ª Ed. México, D.F., 1999; 525-36.

  17. Avendaño LH. Nefrología clínica 1ª Ed. Madrid, España 1984; 82-99.

  18. Morris PJ. Kidney transplantation. 2a Ed. Gran Bretaña 1984; 82-99.

  19. Kasiske BL. Valoración de los candidatos a receptores y donadores vivos. Clínicas Quirúrgicas de Norteamérica 1998; 1: 27-38.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hosp Jua Mex. 2001;68