medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Oftalmología

ISSN 1561-3070 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cub Oftal 2017; 30 (1)

Comparison between femtosecond laser-assisted phacoemulsification and conventional emulsification: visual results and complications

Cuan AY, Montero DE, Cárdenas DT, Pérez CEC, Hormigó PI, Veitía RZ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 0
Page: 1-9
PDF size: 66.99 Kb.


Key words:

facoemulsificación, waterfall, femtoláser.

ABSTRACT

The application of femtoláser in cataract surgery could be one of the great contemporary revolutions occurred in the field of treatment of cataract. If the use of this technology would cause a very superior efficacy and safety over conventional phacoemulsification, it justifies the high cost it generates for cataract surgery today. In reviews of comparative studies we have not found significant differences between the visual results of both procedures at the end of the period of postoperative followup. Better circularity of the capsulorhexis, coupled with decrease in the emission of ultrasonic energy and effective phacoemulsification time, are attributed as the major advantages of using femtoláser in phacoemulsification. However in terms of endothelial cell loss, postoperative corneal edema and macular edema after surgery they have not been recorded big differences between the two surgical techniques, while the cost of surgery is considerably increased with the use of femtoláser. Therefore studies of large sample size, well-designed to provide more reliable evidence regarding the use of femtoláser in current cataract surgery are needed.





2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cub Oftal. 2017;30