medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Cirugía Pediátrica

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2005, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr 2005; 12 (1)

Splenic injury, conservative management or operative

Pérez-Godinez J, González-Romero G, Romero-Montes VE, Olvera-Duran JA, Nava-Carrillo AD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 8
Page: 29-32
PDF size: 47.45 Kb.


Key words:

Spleen, Blunt spleen injury, Nonoperative management.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: The spleen is one of the organs more frequently damaged in the blunt trauma. The management of the blunt splenic injuries has evolved. At present many reports prefer the nonoperative management. We want to present our experience in the nonoperative management of the blunt splenic injuries.
Materials and methods: We revise the expedients of the children that they were presented with blunt splenic injury between March 1998 and February 2004. We analyze sex, age, mechanism of injury, symptoms, physical examination, blood pressure, hematocrit, hematuria and computed tomography scan, management and length of stay of hospitalization.
Results: We have 10 cases which 9 (90%) corresponded to male and 1 (10%) to female. The average age went of 13 years. The majority were produced for bicycle accidents. The zone of great pain was the left upper quadrant. In the computed tomography scan predominate the injuries class I and II. The average hematocrit at admission was 38.1% with a maximum descent of 15% in one case. Four patient requiring blood transfusions. None underwent operative management. The mean length of stay was 7 days. There were not subsequent complications.
Conclusion: The blunt splenic injuries can be approach with security with nonoperative management. Few patient requiring blood transfusions (10ml/kg). The conservative management does not delay needed operations.


REFERENCES

  1. Baeza-Herrera C. Traumatología pediátrica. México: Proyectos editoriales 1997; p. 136-46.

  2. Nyhus LM, Baker RJ, Fischer JE. El dominio de la cirugía. 3ª edición. Buenos Aires: Panamericana 1999; 1378-83.

  3. Rescinti A, Fink MP, Raptopoulos V, Davidoff A, Silva WA. Nonoperative treatment of adult splenic trauma: development of a computed tomographyc scoring that detects appropriate candidates for expectant management. J Trauma 1988; 28: 828-31.

  4. Moore EE, Shackford SR, Oachter HL, Mcaninch JW, Brower D, Champion HR, et al. Organ injury scaling: spleen, liver, kidney. J Trauma 1989; 29: 1664-6.

  5. Task force and blood pressure control in children. Report of the second task force on blood pressure control in children. Pediatrics 1987; 79: 1-25.

  6. Pearl RH, Wesson DE, Spence LJ, Filler RM, Ein SH, Shandling B, et al. Splenic injury: A 5-year update with improved results and changing criteria for conservative management. J Pediatr Surg 1989; 24: 428-31.

  7. Potoka DA, Schall LC, Ford HR. Risk factors for splenectomy in children with blunt splenic trauma. J Pediatr Surg 2002; 37: 294-9.

  8. Frumiento C, Sartorelli K, Vane D. Complications of splenic injuries: expansión of the nonoperative theorem. J Pediatr Surg 2000; 35: 788-91.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Cir Pediatr. 2005;12