medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2017; 74 (5)

Shear strength using total and self etching adhesive with and without sodium hypochlorite in dentin

Cruz CG, Vázquez REM
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 224-230
PDF size: 275.13 Kb.


Key words:

Shearing, adhesive, total engraving, self-etching, NaOCl, dentin.

ABSTRACT

It is a quantitative research where the objective was to determine the shear strength using total and self etching adhesive, introducing deproteinization with 5.25% NaOCl in dentin and comparing its resistance values. The study was performed on 31 mesiodistally and buccololingual sectioned molars, obtaining 124 specimens, suspended in acrylic, polished and placed in refrigeration at 36 oC for 48 hours; Were classified into groups A: Prime & Bond NT, B: NaOCl + Prime & Bond NT, C: NaOCl + Xeno® IV and D: Xeno® IV; A: Dentsply ESTHET-X HD composite resin cylinder was photoactivated, kept for 24 hours in a Felisa oven with 100% humidity, finally tested on the INSTRON machine at a speed of 1 mm/min. The following averages were obtained, groups: A: 6.26, B: 7.71, C: 12.03 and D: 15.06 MPa. For group C and D belonging to the self-etching group, they were statistically significant for the dentinal substrate. NaOCl, showed no significance between the groups.


REFERENCES

  1. Mcleod M, Price RB, Felix CM. Effect of configuration factor on shear bond strengths of self-etch adhesive systems to ground enamel and dentin. Oper Dent. 2010; 35 (1): 84-93.

  2. Knobloch LA, Gailey D, Azer S, Johnston WM, Clelland N, Kerby RE. Bond strengths of one-and two-step self-etch adhesive systems. J Prosthetic Dent. 2007; 97 (4): 216-222.

  3. Ramos G, Calvo N, Fierro R. Adhesión convencional en dentina, dificultades y avances en la técnica. Rev Fac Odontol Univ Antioq. 2015; 26 (2): 468-486.

  4. Yessilyurt C, Bulucu B. Bond strength of total-etch and self-etch dentin adhesive systems on peripheral and central dentinal tissue: a microtensile bond strength test. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2006; 7 (2): 26-36.

  5. Monsalves S, Astorga C, Bader M. Evaluación del grado de adhesión a la dentina de dos tipos adhesivos de uso clínico actual. Revista Dental de Chile. 2011; 102 (1): 4-12.

  6. Zamora P, Bader M. Resistencia adhesiva de restauraciones de resina compuesta realizadas con un adhesivo universal con y sin grabado ácido. Rev Biomater. 2015; 2 (1): 94-115.

  7. Kubo S, Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ. Nanoleakage of dentin adhesive systems bonded to Carisolv-treated dentin. Oper Dent. 2002; 27 (4): 387-395.

  8. Moncada G, Schmidth R, Ángel P, Martín J, Fernández E. Estudio comparativo de adhesión en dentina radicular de sujetos jóvenes y adultos usando dos sistemas adhesivos. Revista Dental de Chile. 2009; 100 (2): 10-13.

  9. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater. 1998; 14: 99-105.

  10. Padrós-Serrat JL, Monterrubio-Berga M, Padrós-Cruz E. Adhesivos autograbantes: ¿Grabar o no grabar? RCOE. 2003; 8 (4): 363-375.

  11. Gomes MM. Sistemas adhesivos auto grabadores en esmalte: ventajas e inconvenientes. Av Odontoestomatol. 2004; 20 (4): 193-198.

  12. Ruan-Antury JD, Gomes JC, Uribe-Echevarría J. Influencia de la desproteinización dentinaria sobre la resistencia adhesiva. RODYB. 2006; 1 (1): 52-60.

  13. Ruan-Antury JD, Gomes JC, Uribe-Echevarría J, Gomes OM. Resistencia adhesiva de los sistemas adhesivos autoacondicionadores al sustrato dentinario, desproteinizado a través del hipoclorito de sodio. Actas Odontológicas. 2016; 3 (1): 60-69.

  14. Bradna P, Vrbova R, Dudek M, Roubickova A, Housova D. Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2008; 10: 423-429.

  15. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2001; 23 (6): 481-486.

  16. Kensche A, Dähne C, Wagenschwanz G, Richter G, Viergutz H. Shear bond strength of different types of adhesive systems to dentin and enamel of deciduous teeth in vitro. Clin Oral Invest. 2016; 20 (4): 831-840.

  17. Mithra N, Shruti B. An evaluation and comparison of shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin, using newer dentin bonding agents. J Conserv Dent. 2008; 11 (2): 71-75.

  18. Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad. Evaluación comparativa de la eficacia de unión de los agentes de unión de generación de sexto y séptimo: Un in-vitro estudio. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 27-30.

  19. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha J, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin CH et al. Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent. 2001; 19: 55-61.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2017;74