medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2017, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2017; 74 (6)

Frequency of oral injuries and variants of the normal in patients of the Department of Stomatology of the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez

Donohue-Cornejo A, Tovar-Carrillo KL, De la Torre-Morán G, Espinosa-Cristóbal LF, Guzmán-Gastelum DA, García-Calderón AG, Cuevas-González JC

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 298-303
PDF size: 311.20 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: A detailed intraoral examination is key in the early diagnosis of potentially aggressive lesions; in this way, the patient is offered an adequate and timely treatment, reducing to the maximum possible complications that could endanger his integrity and deteriorate his quality of life. Aim: To determine the frequency of lesions and conditions of the buccal mucosa in patients older than 18 years of the diagnostic clinic of the Department of Stomatology at the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua. Material and methods: A descriptive study was carried out in which, with prior informed consent, lesions and conditions of the oral mucosa were evaluated in patients older than 18 years who attended the admission clinic of the Department of Stomatology at the Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua. Intraoral examination was performed by two examiners previously standardized by an oral pathologist; intraoral mirror, artificial light, and gauze were used. The SPSS statistical program (version 20) was used to put up a data collection sheet. We used descriptive statistics for analysis. Results: Of a total of 186 patients, 119 (64%) were female and 67 (37%) male; mean age was 42.7 years. The most common oral lesions were white frictional lesions (32.8%) and tissue increase with apparent cause (8.6%); the normal variants that were most identified in our population were physiologic melanosis (47.8%) and Fordyce granules (43.5%). Conclusions: Reporting the lesions and conditions of the oral cavity of our population marks the first step for subsequent epidemiological studies, in addition to raising awareness of the great diversity of lesions and variants of normal that can be found in a population as varied as that located in a border town.


REFERENCES

  1. Balbín CE, De la Cueva DP, Mauleón FC, Valdivielso RM, Hernanz HJ. Hiperqueratosis friccional oral. Acta Pediatr Esp. 2009; 67 (3): 123-124.

  2. Rooban T, Rao A, Joshua E, Ranganathan K. The prevalence of oral mucosal lesions in alcohol misusers in Chennai, South India. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20 (1): 41-46.

  3. Al-Khateeb TH. Benign oral masses in a Northern Jordanian population —a retrospective study. Open Dent J. 2009; 3: 147-153.

  4. Trullenque-Eriksson A, Muñoz-Corcuera M, Campo-Trapero J, Cano-Sánchez J, Bascones-Martínez A. Analysis of new diagnostic methods in suspicious lesions of the oral mucosa. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2009; 14 (5): E210-216.

  5. López-Verdín S, Bologna-Molina R, Sánchez-Becerra AE, Horta-Sandoval AC. Frecuencia de patologías bucales en una clínica de atención primaria odontológica. Rev Tamé. 2013; 2 (4): 100-105.

  6. Raposo A, Monsalves MJ, Aravena P, Sanhueza A. Prevalencia de lesiones de la mucosa oral en el Hospital Hernán Henríquez Aravena de Temuco. Int J Morphol. 2011; 29 (2): 622-627.

  7. Cury PR, Porto LP, dos Santos JN, Figueiredo e Ribeiro LS, de Aquino XF, Figueiredo AL et al. Oral mucosal lesions in Indians from Northeast Brazil: cross-sectional study of prevalence and risk indicators. Medicine (Baltimore). 2014; 93 (27): e140.

  8. Castellanos JL, Díaz-Guzmán L. Lesions of the oral mucosa: an epidemiological study of 23,785 Mexican patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008; 105 (1): 79-85.

  9. Guerra-Cobián O, Sarracent-Pérez H, Urbizo-Vélez J. Lesiones blancas de la cavidad bucal. Concordancia diagnóstica. Rev Haban Cienc Méd. 2014; 13 (5): 690-700.

  10. Angulo-Núñez JJ, Rodríguez-Archilla A. Lesiones de la mucosa bucal en pacientes de Mérida, Venezuela. Invest Clin. 2015; 56 (4): 367-376.

  11. Freyre GJ, Vivanco CB, Lozano CL, Martínez LL, López BM. Lesiones de tejidos blandos bucodentales en pacientes psiquiátricos hospitalizados. Rev ADM. 2001; 58 (3): 90-97.

  12. Donohué-Cornejo A, Leyva-Huerta ER, Ponce-Bravo S, Aldape-Barrios B, Quezada-Rivera D, Borges-Yánez A et al. Distribución de condiciones y lesiones de la mucosa bucal en pacientes adultos mexicanos. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2007; 44 (1).

  13. Tamarit-Borrás M, Delgado-Molina E, Berini-Aytés L, Gay-Escoda C. Removal of hyperplastic lesions of the oral cavity. A retrospective study of 128 cases. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2005; 10 (2): 151-162.

  14. Guedes MM, Albuquerque R, Monteiro M, Lopes CA, do Amaral JB, Pacheco JJ et al. Oral soft tissue biopsies in Oporto, Portugal: an eight-year retrospective analysis. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015; 7 (5): e640-648.

  15. Jiménez C. Lesiones ulcerativas. Acta Odontol Venez. 2007; 45: 494-495.

  16. Vieira-Andrade RG, Zuquim Guimarães F de F, Vieira Cda S, Freire ST, Ramos-Jorge ML, Fernandes AM. Oral mucosa alterations in a socioeconomically deprived region: prevalence and associated factors. Braz Oral Res. 2011; 25 (5): 393-400.

  17. Regezi JA, Sciubba JJ. Patología bucal: correlaciones clinicopatológicas. 3.a ed. México: MacGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2007. p. 656.

  18. Ayuso-Montero R, Torrent-Collado J, López-López J. Estomatitis protésica: puesta al día. RCOE. 2004; 9 (6): 645-652.

  19. Barata-Caballero D, Durán-Porto A, Carrillo-Baracaldo S. Estomatitis protésica aspectos clínicos y tratamiento. Prof Dent. 2002; 5 (10): 622-627.

  20. Nápoles-González IJ, Rivero-Pérez O, García-Nápoles CI, Pérez-Sarduy D. Lesiones de la mucosa bucal asociadas al uso de prótesis totales en pacientes geriatras. AMC. 2016; 20 (2): 158-166.

  21. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Ergin S, Erdogan O, Ates G. Evaluation of satisfaction and complications in patients with existing complete dentures. J Oral Sci. 2013; 55: 29-37.

  22. Fernández-Blanco G, Guzmán-Fawcett A, Vera I. Lesiones pigmentadas de la mucosa oral. Parte I. Dermatología CMQ. 2015; 13 (2): 139-148.

  23. Villalba V, Valenzuela Y, Ramírez MC, Faundez E. Lesiones pigmentadas de la mucosa oral. Rev Chilena Dermatol. 2011; 27 (2): 203-211.

  24. Gaballah KY, Rahimi I. Can presence of oral Fordyce’s granules serve as a marker for hyperlipidemia? Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014; 11 (5): 553-558.

  25. Mansur AT, Aydingoz IE. Unilateral buccal Fordyce spots with ipsilateral facial paralysis: a sign of neuro-sebaceous connection? Acta Derm Venereol. 2012; 92 (2): 177-178.

  26. Fuentes-Fernández R, Borie-Echevarría E, Sanhueza-Campos A, Rebolledo-Soto K, Parra-Villagrán P. Presencia de exostosis orales en pacientes de la ciudad de Temuco, Chile. Av. Odontoestomatol. 2012; 28 (2): 63-69.

  27. Auskalnis A, Rutknas V, Bernhardt O, Sidlauskas M, Salomskiene L, Baseviciene N. Multifactorial etiology of Torus mandibularis: study of twins. Stomatologija. 2015; 17 (2): 35-40.

  28. Maduakor SN, Nwoga MC. Prevalence of mandibular and palatine tori among the Ibos in Enugu, South-East Nigeria. Niger J Clin Pract. 2017; 20 (1): 57-60.

  29. Alzarea BK. Prevalence and pattern of torus palatinus and torus mandibularis among edentulous patients of Saudi Arabia. Clin Interv Aging. 2016; 11: 209-213.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com