medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Hematología

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Hematol Mex 2017; 18 (3)

Ambulatory treatment of febrile neutropenia, cost and effectiveness assessment

Cantú-Rodríguez OG, González-Martínez A, Garza-Acosta AC, Gutiérrez-Aguirre CH, Gómez-Almaguer D
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 105-113
PDF size: 279.96 Kb.


Key words:

febrile neutropenia, outpatient treatment, hospital admission, cost.

ABSTRACT

Background: Febrile neutropenia is a common complication of chemotherapy that significantly impacts on treatment response and requires an expensive management. Outpatient treatment is an alternative for low risk patients, supported by a clinic that facilitates early access to laboratory and medication. An additional benefit is a greater capacity of patient care, optimizing economic resources by cost reduction. There are currently comparative studies with hospital admission and outpatient management, as well as cost analysis; nevertheless, there are no reports in Mexico.
Objetive: To assess the results of treatment of febrile neutropenia in patients with hematological diseases in the intrahospitalary and ambulatory setting, besides the safety, efficacy and convenience of the latest and costs of care of these patients in our center.
Material and Method: An observational, descriptive, prospective study was performed from August 2014 to June 2015, involving patients with hematological disease and febrile neutropenia. Patients at low risk according to the MASCC scale received outpatient management at hematology clinic.
Results: There were included 39 patients, from which 62% received hospital admission, and 38% outpatient management. We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups regarding treatment days, neutropenia recovery time, or changes in antibiotic treatment. The average outpatient cost was 10,796.22 Mexican pesos and that of the hospital management was 41,160.34 Mexican pesos (p = 0.001). In the outpatient group, 4 patients required hospitalization on subsequent days. There were 5 deaths, 3 in the inpatient treatment group and 2 in the outpatient group subsequently hospitalized (p = 0.649).
Conclusions: Outpatient management of febrile neutropenia in low-risk patients may be successful and significantly less expensive than hospital management.


REFERENCES

  1. Freifeld AG, Bow EJ, Sepkowitz KA, et al. Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of america. Clin Infect Dis 2011;52(4):e56-93. doi:10.1093/cid/cir073.

  2. Klastersky J, Awada A, Paesmans M, Aoun M. Febrile neutropenia: a critical review of the initial management. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2011;78(3):185-194. doi:10.1016/j. critrevonc.2010.03.008.

  3. Lingaratnam S, Slavin MA, Koczwara B, et al. Introduction to the Australian consensus guidelines for the management of neutropenic fever in adult cancer patients. Intern Med J 2010 / 2011. 2011;41:75-81. doi:10.1111/j.1445- 5994.2010.02338.x.

  4. Klastersky JA, Paesmans M. Treatment of febrile neutropenia is expensive: Prevention is the answer. Onkologie 2011:226-228. doi:10.1159/000327818.

  5. Cullen M, Baijal S. Prevention of febrile neutropenia: use of prophylactic antibiotics. Br J Cancer 2009;101 Suppl 1:S11-4. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6605270.

  6. McKenzie H, Hayes L, White K, et al. Chemotherapy outpatients’ unplanned presentations to hospital: a retrospective study. Support care cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer 2011;19(7):963-969. doi:10.1007/ s00520-010-0913-y.

  7. Rolston KVI. Challenges in the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria in patients with cancer and neutropenia. Clin Infect Dis 2005;40 Suppl 4:S246-52. doi:10.1086/427331.

  8. Schilling MB, Parks C, Deeter RG. Costs and outcomes associated with hospitalized cancer patients with neutropenic complications: A retrospective study. Exp Ther Med 2011:859-866. doi:10.3892/etm.2011.312.

  9. Weycker D, Malin J, Edelsberg J, Glass A, Gokhale M, Oster G. Cost of neutropenic complications of chemotherapy. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol 2008;19(3):454-460. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm525.

  10. Klastersky J. Management of fever in neutropenic patients with different risks of complications. Clin Infect Dis 39 (suppl 1): S32-S37, 2004.

  11. Aapro M, Cornes P, Abraham I. Comparative cost-efficiency across the European G5 countries of various regimens of filgrastim, biosimilar filgrastim, and pegfilgrastim to reduce the incidence of chemotherapy-induced febrile neutropenia. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2012;18(2):171-179. doi:10.1177/1078155211407367.

  12. Hendricks AM, Loggers ET, Talcott JA. Costs of home versus inpatient treatment for fever and neutropenia: analysis of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 2011;29(30):3984-3989. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.35.1247.

  13. Lingaratnam S, Worth L, Slavin M, Bennet C, Kirsa S, et al. A cost analysis of febrile neutropenia management in Australia: ambulatory v. in hospital treatment. Australian Health Review 2011;35:491-500.

  14. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH. Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 2006;106(10):2258-2266. doi:10.1002/cncr.21847.

  15. Lingaratnam S, Slavin MA, Koczwara B, et al. Introduction to the Australian consensus guidelines for the management of neutropenic fever in adult cancer patients, 2010/2011. Australian Consensus Guidelines 2011 Steering Committee. Intern Med J 2011;41(1b):75-81. doi:10.1111/j.1445- 5994.2010.02338.x.

  16. Castro C, Gascón P, Casas-Fernández A, Antón A, López R, et al. Epidemiology and characteristics of febrile neutropenia in oncology patients from Sapnish tertiary care hospitals: PINNACLE study. Mol & Clin Oncol 2015;3:725-729. doi: 10.3892/mco.2015.524

  17. Dinan M, Hirsch B, Lyman G. Management of chemotherapy– induced neutropenia: measuring quality, cost, and value. JNCCN 2015;13(1):e1-e7.

  18. Fust K, Li X, Maschio M, Villa G, Parthan A, et al. Costeffectiveness analysis of prophylaxis treatmet stratagies to reduce the incidence of febril neutropenia in patients with early-stage breast cancer or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Pharmacoeconomics 2017;35:425-438. doi: 10.1007/ s40273-016-0474-0.

  19. Catic T, Mekic A and Sulejmanovic S. Cost of febrile neutropenia treatmet in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Mater Sociomed 2016 28(2):112-114. doi: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.112-114.

  20. Cantú O, Jaime JC, Gutierrez H, González O, Mancias C, et al. Outpatient allografting using a non myeloabaltive conditioning: the Mexican experience. Bone Marrow Transpl 2007;40:119-23.

  21. OECD (2017), Hospital beds (indicator). doi: 10.1787/0191328e-en (Accessed on 14 September 2017)




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Hematol Mex. 2017;18