medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista de Sanidad Militar

ISSN 0301-696X (Print)
Órgano de difusión del Servicio de Sanidad Militar y del Colegio Nacional de Médicos Militares
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Sanid Milit Mex 2017; 71 (5)

Treatment options for severe paravalvular leak after open heart surgery: intervention by catheterization or a second surgery

Martín HP, Gutiérrez LH, Ojeda DJL, Cortéz BA, Hernández JL, Rebollo HV, Galván VCG, Valenzuela HJC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 473-476
PDF size: 418.63 Kb.


Key words:

Paravalvular leak, aortic insufficiency, valvular prosthesis.

ABSTRACT

The purpose of presenting this first successful case of closure of a paravalvular aortic leak with the Vascular Plug III device is to make it known that in the Central Military Hospital, treatment is another choice, besides heart surgery. Closure by percutaneous intervention is an acceptable option with good clinical results, fewer complications, fast recovery, and patients can resume their daily activities in a very short time.


REFERENCES

  1. Kliger C, Ruiz CE. Reconsideración del cierre percutáneo de la fuga paravalvular: żhacia dónde vamos ahora? Rev Esp Cardiol. 2014; 67 (8): 593-596.

  2. Kodali SK, Williams MR, Smith CR, Svensson LG, Webb JG, Makkar RR et al. Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366 (18): 1686-1695.

  3. Hammermeister K, Sethi GK, Henderson WG, Grover FL, Oprian C, Rahimtoola SH. Outcomes 15 years after valve replacement with a mechanical versus a bioprosthetic valve: final report of the Veterans Affairs randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000; 36 (4): 1152-1158.

  4. Genoni M, Franzen D, Vogt P, Seifert B, Jenni R, Künzli A et al. Paravalvular leakage after mitral valve replacement: improved long-term survival with aggressive surgery? Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000; 17 (1): 14-19.

  5. Rallidis LS, Moyssakis IE, Ikonomidis I, Nihoyannopoulos P. Natural history of early aortic paraprosthetic regurgitation: a five-year follow-up. Am Heart J. 1999; 138 (2 Pt 1): 351-357.

  6. Abdel-Wahab M, Zahn R, Horack M, Gerckens U, Schuler G, Sievert H et al. Aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: incidence and early outcome. Results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry. Heart. 2011; 97 (11): 899-906.

  7. Echevarria JR, Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Morales D, Revilla Y, Revuelta JM. Reoperation for bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. A decade of clinical experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1991; 5 (10): 523-526; discussion 527.

  8. Kim MS, Casserly IP, Garcia JA, Klein AJ, Salcedo EE, Carroll JD. Percutaneous transcatheter closure of prosthetic mitral paravalvular leaks: are we there yet? JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009; 2 (2): 81-90.

  9. Wang W, Li H, Tam MD, Zhou D, Wang DX, Spain J. The amplatzer vascular plug: a review of the device and its clinical applications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012; 35 (4): 725-740.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Sanid Milit Mex. 2017;71