medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences

ISSN 1659-1046 (Print)
Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc 2017; 19 (3)

Evaluación de un software para la detección de caries

Aldous JA, Lowder G, Boseman J
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 15
Page: 61-67
PDF size: 148.38 Kb.


Key words:

Caries detection, Logicon, Diagnosis.

ABSTRACT

The diagnostic accuracy of caries detecting software that assesses density in digital radiographs was questioned. Analysis of radiographs of extracted teeth using Logicon revealed a deviation in specificity for caries from visual examination of the teeth as well as from their radiographic images. Subsequent preparation of teeth similar to a clinical preparation for a restoration revealed a marked deviation from the Logicon analysis. Radiographic interpretation of early caries and resultant treatment decisions are a multifaceted complex process that is not simplified by desired but unreliable current computerized technique.


REFERENCES

  1. Summitt J. B., Robbins J. W., Hilton T. J., Schwartz R. S., dos Santos J. 3rd ed. Hanover Park, 111: Quintessen Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry: A Contemporary Approach, ce Publishing Co; 2006: VII.

  2. Verdonschot E. H., Angmar-Mansson B. Deery C., et al. Developments in caries diagnosis and their relationship to treatment decisions and quality of care. Caries Res.1999; 33 (1): 32-40.

  3. Christensen G. J. C. R. Clinicians Report. 2011: 4 (3): 1-3.

  4. Gakenheimer D. C. The efficacy of a computerized caries detector in intraoral digital radiography. JADA. 2002; 133(7): 883-890.

  5. lbid.

  6. Wenzel A. Computer-Automated Cares Detection in Digital Bitewings: Consistency of a Program and lts lnfluence on Observer Agreement. Caries Res. 2001; 35 (1): 12-20.

  7. Wenzel A., Hintze H., Kokld L. M., Kold S. Accuracy of computer-automated caries detection in digital radiographs compared with human observers. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002; 110 (3): 199-206.

  8. Forner-Navarro L., Llena-Puy M. C., Garcia-Godoy F. Diagnostic performance of radioviography in combination with a diagnosis assisting program versus conventional radiography and radioviography in basic mode and with magnification. Med Oral Pato/ Oral Cir Bucal. 2008; 13 (4): E261-5.

  9. Behere R. R., Lele S. M. Reliability of Logicon caries detector in the detection and depth assessment of dental caries: An in-vitro study. lndian J Dent Res. 2011; 22: 362-362.

  10. Carestream. Logicon Caries Detector Essential Prescribing Information.

  11. Kidd EAM, Fejerskov O. What Constitutes Dental Caries? Histophatology of Carious Enamel and Dentin Related to the Action of Cariogenic Biofilms. J Dent Res. 2004; 83 (Spec lss C): C35-C38.

  12. lbid.

  13. Ratledge D. K., Kidd E. A. M., Beighton D. A Clinical and Microbiological Study of Approximal Carious Lesions. 2001; Caries Res 35 (1): 3-7.

  14. White S. C., Pharoah M. J., eds. Oral Radiology, Principies and lnterpretation. 6t h Ed. St. Louis,MO: Mosby; 2009: 270-274.

  15. Glick M. Clinical judgment, a Requirement far professional identity. JADA. 2011; 142 (12):1333-1334.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc. 2017;19