medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Pediátrica de México

Órgano Oficial del Instituto Nacional de Pediatría
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Pediatr Mex 2018; 39 (1)

Overview of Case-Control Studies

González-Garay A, Díaz-García L, Chiharu-Murata, Anzo-Osorio A, García PS
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 72-80
PDF size: 969.93 Kb.


Key words:

cases-controls studies, odds ratio, causality.

ABSTRACT

Background: Case-control studies are useful for risk factors research, speacially for rare diseases or diseases with a prolonged latency period.
Objective: To identify the main characteristics of the case-control study, in order to reduce bias during the study evaluation and/or conduction.
Description: This design is characterized by the selection of subjects with and without the event of interest and they are compared to identify risk factors in order to infer causal relationship, which is expressed, by odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals.
Conclusions: Case-controls studies are a relatively easy and quick design to perform. However, it is susceptible to multiple sources of bias, which must be minimized to obtain greater reliability in the obtained inferences.


REFERENCES

  1. Schlesselman J, Stolley P. Observational Studies. Design, Conduct, Analysis in Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford University Press 1982; pp. 10-20.

  2. Schlesselman J, Stolley P. Cohort and Case Control Sampling Schemes. Design, Conduct, Analysis in Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford University Press 1982; pp. 34-45.

  3. Schlesselman J, Stolley P. Association and Testing for Significance. Design, Conduct, Analysis in Monographs in Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Oxford University Press 1982; pp. 53-56.

  4. Bottaro F. Diseño de los estudios de investigación. Debilidades y fortalezas. Hematología. 2014;18(1):74-83.

  5. Song J, Chung K. Observational Studies: Cohort and Case- Control Studies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):2234-42.

  6. Lenz W and Knapp K. Thalidomide Embryopathy. Arc Environ Hlth. 1962;5(2):14-19.

  7. Delgado-Rodríguez M, Sillero M. Revisión: Diseños Híbridos de Estudios de Cohortes y de Estudios de Casos y Controles. Gaceta Sanitaria. 1995;9(46):42-52.

  8. Casagranda L. et al. Second malignant neoplasm following childhood cancer: A nested case-control study of a recent cohort (1987–2004) from the Childhood Cancer Registry of the Rhône-Alpes region in France. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology. 2016;33(6):371-82.

  9. Silva G. Selection of subjects in case-controls studies. São Paulo Medical Journal.1995;113(2):24-27.

  10. Lazcano-Ponce E, Salazar-Martínez E, Hernández-Avila M. Estudios epidemiológicos de casos y controles. Fundamento teórico, variantes y aplicaciones. Salud Pub Mex. 2001;43(2):135-50.

  11. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Kjellström T. Tipos de estudios en Epidemiología básica. 1ª Edición. Organización Panamericana de la Salud 2003. pp. 31-38.

  12. Lazcano-Ponce E, Salazar-Martínez E, Hernández-Ávila M. Estudios epidemiológicos de casos y controles. Fundamento teórico, variantes y aplicaciones. Salud Pub Mex. 2001;43(2):73-83.

  13. Wacholerder S, Silvervan D, McLaughlin J, Mandel J. Selection of Controls in Case-Control Studies. III. Design Options. American Journal of Epidemiology. 1992;135(9):1042-50.

  14. Silva, G. Selection of subjects in case-controls studies. Sao Paulo Medical Journal. 1995;113(2):41-42.

  15. Rothman K, Greenland S, Timothy L. Modern Epidemiology. 2ª edición. Lippincott-Raven 1998.

  16. Rada, G. and Merino, T. Epidemiología analítica. Estudios de casos y controles. (escuela.med.puc.cl/recursos/recepidem/ epiAnal5.htm, 2007).

  17. Szklo M, Nieto J. Epidemiology: Beyond the Basics. 2º ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2006: pp. 227-44.

  18. Berea-Baltierra R, Rivas-Ruiz R, Pérez-Rodríguez M, Palacios-Cruz L, Moreno J, Talavera JO. Clinical research XX. From clinical judgment to multiple logistic regression model. Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2014 ;52(2):192-7.

  19. Westoff CF, Bumpass L. The revolution in birth control practices of U.S. Roman Catholics. Science. 1973;179(4068):41-4.

  20. Diario Oficial, Reglamento de la ley general de salud en materia de investigación para la salud. 1987-01-06, N. 3, tomo CCCC, p. 98-113.

  21. NORMA Oficial Mexicana NOM-012-SSA3-2012, Que establece los criterios para la ejecución de proyectos de investigación para la salud en seres humanos México: 2013. [citado 20 de Junio 2017]. Disponible en: (dof.gob.mx/ nota_detalle.php?codigo=5284148&fecha=04/01/2013)




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Pediatr Mex. 2018;39