Santos PH, Martínez CS, Martínez HCM, Castro GV

Language: Spanish
References: 12
Page: 3-9
PDF size: 301.62 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The Integral Health Care Model at the Institute of Social Security of the state of Tabasco was structured by two basic components: occupational health and family health. Objective: To describe the results of the evaluation process of the Occupational Health program, which operationalize the occupational health component in the Health Care Model. Material and methods: an evaluative research focused on health care area was performed into 2009-2011 in three selected municipalities A sample of 259 workers who were polled and 17 officials and doctors in these municipalities was interviewed. Occupational Health program's indicator was used to apply the Multi-criteria Analysis as only evaluative technique. Results: the nine Social Criteria indicators included in the Multi Criteria Analysis were fully accomplish; six indicators for Technical Criteria and two of three indicators of Institutional criteria (66.6%) were accomplish at a municipality. In summary, of the three criteria proposed for assessing Occupational Health program using multi-criteria analysis, the best compliance was for the Social Criteria, with 12 of the 13 indicators met fully and municipality Centro was relevant in the overall assessment. Conclusions: the results confirmed the relevance of the application of an unconventional technique or instrument as Multi Criteria Analysis for the Model evaluation system and monitoring Occupational Health Program during its implementation level.

REFERENCES

1. México. Ley del Instituto de Seguridad Social del Estado de Tabasco de 2008. Tribunal Superior de Justicia. Diario Oficial. (Intenet) (citado 2010) Dis-ponible en: http//www.tsj-tabasco.gob.mx.

2. Martínez R, Fernández A. Metodologías e instrumentos para la formulación, evaluación y monitoreo de programas sociales. Análisis multicriterio. (Internet) (citado 2010). Disponible en: http:/ es.scribd.com/doc/50042215/cepal-analisis-multicriterio.

3. Bausela E. Evaluación externa de un Servicio de Orientación Universitaria. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2005;10(1):43-54.

4. Briones G. Evaluación de programas sociales. Méxi-co: Editorial Trillas; 1991.

5. Quintero J. Citado por Correa et al. 1995.

6. Correa S, Puerta A, Restrepo B. Investigación eva-luativa. Especialización en teoría, métodos y técnicas de investigación social. Instituto Colombiano para el Fomento de la Educación Superior (Icfes); 1996.

7. Osuna JL, Márquez C. Guía para la evaluación de políticas públicas. Instituto de Desarrollo Regional Sociedad Espa-ñola de Evaluación de Políticas Públicas. Andalucía, Es-paña. s/f. (Internet) (citado 2011). Disponible en: http://siare.clad.org/siare/innotend/evaluacion/manualeval.pdf.

8. Chacón S, Anguera T, Ruiz JL. Diseños de evalua-ción de programas: bases metodológicas. Psicot-hema. 2000;12 Suppl 1:S127-31.

9. Análisis multicriterio. Documento s/f (Internet) (citado 2009). Disponible en: http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/ eva-luaion/methodology/examples/too_cri_res_es.pdf.

10. Cohen E, Martínez R. Manual. Formulación, evalua-ción y monitoreo de proyectos sociales. División de Desarrollo Social. CEPAL. s/f (Internet) (citado 2010). Disponible en: http://accionsocial.ucr.ac.cr/ sites/default/files/documentos/manual_formulacion.pdf.

11. Pacheco JF, Contreras E. Manual metodológico de evaluación multicriterio para programas y proyectos. Serie Manuales Nº 58. CEPAL; 2008.

12. Álvarez G, Acosta J, Céspedes VH. Guía metodológica para evaluar la formulación de los planes de salud terri-toriales 2008-2011. Versión preliminar. Bogotá, Co-lombia: Colección PNSP; 2008 (Internet) (citado 2010). Disponible en: https://www.minsalud.gov.co/salud/ do-cuments/guia%20metodologica%20para%20evaluar% 20la%20formulaci%c3%93n%20de%20los%20planes %20de%20salud%20territoriales%202008-2011.pdf.