Ibáñez BC

Language: Spanish
References: 5
Page: 124-128
PDF size: 79.70 Kb.

ABSTRACT

These comments to Pardos’ target-paper are meant to make some critical remarks to his arguments about the role images play as the structural basis of thinking. Even though the paper offers a thesis which might support an original and important line of research, we believe it is still mandatory to specify the nature of the so-called mental images, the type of evidence needed to sustain its existence, as well as the theoretical ne necessity to propound metaphysical entities in order to account for phenomena traditionally considered as “imagination”.

REFERENCES

1. Hicks, G. D. (1924). On the nature of images. British Journal of Psychology, 15(2): 121-148.

2. Kantor, J. R. (1924). Principles of psychology. Chicago, Illinois: The Principia Press.

3. ——. (1990). La evolución científica de la psicología. México: Trillas. Laeng, B., & Teodorescu, D. (2002). Eye scanpaths during visual imagery reenact those of perception of the same visual scene. Cognitive Science, 26, 207-231.

4. Pardos, A. (2017). Las imágenes en el pensamiento. Revista

5. Mexicana de Investigación en Psicología, 9(2), 87-102.