2017, Number 4
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Cardiol 2017; 28 (4)
Aortic stenosis severity and its correlation with left ventricular morphology, left atrial volume and the E/e’ ratio
Sánchez-Lezama F, Harrison-Gómez C, Domínguez CLG, Ramírez-Cuéllar MD, Mosqueda MMR, Atilano FLN
Language: English
References: 18
Page: 163-171
PDF size: 276.69 Kb.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease, with incidence about 2 to 9% in elderly patients. Echocardiography has become the most important technique for diagnosis.
Objective: To correlate the left ventricle morphology, left atrial volume index and the E/e’ wave velocity ratio in patients with aortic valve stenosis of different magnitudes.
Methods: Conventional measurements in M-mode echocardiography, two-dimensional, pulsed, continuous, color and tissue Doppler reports were performed, obtaining: left ventricle diastolic diameter, left ventricle systolic diameter, end-diastole interventricular septum thickness, end-diastole posterior wall thickness, left ventricle ejection fraction, end-diastole thickness/radius ratio, left ventricular mass, end-systole left atrium volume, peak systolic aortic jet velocity, peak and mean systolic aortic gradient and aortic valve area, E wave and e’ wave in 42 patients with diagnosis of aortic stenosis.
Results: Twelve cases (28.5%) were mild; 17 patients (40.5%) moderate and 13 cases (31%) with severe stenosis. Left ventricle concentric remodeling was three times more in cases of moderate and severe stenosis (p ‹ 0.05). End-systole left atrial volume increased 32% in moderate stenosis and 33% in severe stenosis. The E/e’ wave ratio increased parallel as the severity of the stenosis, 33% in moderate stenosis (p ‹ 0.05) and 56% in severe cases (p ‹ 0.05).
Conclusions: In aortic stenosis left ventricle concentric remodeling is three times more frequent, end-systole left atrial volume increases more than 30% from moderate degrees and E/e´ wave ratio increases 30% in moderate cases and 50% in severe cases. The latter two could be used as new markers of
aortic stenosis severity classification.
REFERENCES
OTTO, Catherine M. In The Practice of Clinical Echocardiography. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Saunders Elsevier, 2007, pp. 516-551.
Rajappan K, Rimoldi OE, Dutka DP et al. Mechanisms of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in patients with aortic stensosis and angiographically normal coronary arteries. Circulation. 2002; 105: 470-476.
Ross J Jr, Braunwald E. Aortic stenosis. Circulation. 1968; 38 (1 Suppl): 61-67.
Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Chatterjee K, De Leon AC, Faxon DP, Freed MD et al. ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease). J Am Coll Cardiol 2006; 48: -e148.
Vahanian A, Baumgartner H, Bax J, Leiden T, Butchart E, Cardiff et al. Guidelines on the management of valvular heart disease: the task force on the management of valvular heart disease of the european society of cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2007; 28: 230-268.
Bruch C, Stypmann J, Grude M, Gradaus R, Breithardt G, Wichter T. Tissue Doppler imaging in patients with moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis: clinical usefulness and diagnostic accuracy. Am Heart J. 2004; 148: 696-702.
Poh K, Chan M, Yang H, Yong Q, Chan Y, Ling L. Prognostication of valvular aortic stenosis using tissue Doppler echocardiography: underappreciated importance of late diastolic mitral annular velocity. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2008; 21 (5): 475-481.
Triposkiadis F, Pitsavos C, Boudoulas H, Trikas A, Kallikazaros C, Stefanadis C et al. Left atrial volume and function in valvular aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis. 1993; 2: 104-113.
Dalsgaard M, Egstrup K, Wachtell K, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D, Kjaergaard J et al. Left atrial volume in patients with asymptomatic aortic valve stenosis (the Simvastatin and Ezetimibe in aortic stenosis study). Am J Cardiol. 2008; 101: 1030-1034.
Lester S, Ryan E, Schiller N, Foster E. Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size. Am J Cardiol. 1999; 84 (7): 829-832.
Devereux R, Alonso D, Lutas E, Gottlieb G, Campo E, Sachs I et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol. 1986; 57 (6): 450-458.
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013; 34 (28): 2159-2219.
Appleton CP, Jensen JL, Hatle LK, Oh JK. Doppler evaluation of left and right ventricular diastolic function: a technical guide for obtaining optimal flow velocity recordings. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997; 10 (3): 271-291.
Ruan Q, Rao L, Middleton J, Khoury DS, Nagueh S. Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by early diastolic mitral annulus peak acceleration rate: experimental studies and clinical application. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006; 100 (2): 679-684.
Lancellotti P, Magne J, Donal E, Davin L, O’Connor K, Rosca M, et al. Clinical outcome in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis: insights from the new proposed aortic stenosis grading classification. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012; 59 (3): 235-243.
Eleid MF, Sorajja P, Michelena HI, Malouf JF, Scott CG, Pellikka PA. Survival by stroke volume index in patients with low-gradient normal EF severe aortic stenosis. Heart. 2014; 101 (1): 23-29.
Abdelaziz AA. Left atrial volume index in patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. The Egyptian Heart Journal. 2014; 66 (1): 55-62.
Baumgartner H, Hung J, Bermejo J, Chamber JB, Evangelista A, Griffin BP et al. Echocardiographic assessment of valve stenosis: EAE/ASE recommendations for clinical practice. Eur J Echocardiogr. 2009; 10 (1): 1-25.