medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Angiología

Órgano Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Angiol 2017; 45 (3)

Infecciones en cirugía vascular: Estudio de incidencia y una revisión sobre las controversias en su abordaje terapéutico. Hospital Regional “Dr. Valentín Gómez Farías” del ISSSTE en Zapopan, Jalisco, México

Ruiz-Mercado H, Hernández-Nieto BI, Tapia-Rangel JC, Ochoa-González FJ, Díaz-Estrella I, Bravo-Cuéllar A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 45
Page: 107-120
PDF size: 273.63 Kb.


Key words:

Vascular infection, vascular infection management disputes.

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Vascular infections are a challenge for the vascular surgeon. There is a risk of infection (0.5 to 5%) and catastrophic results for delayed or inadequate treatment. Treatment varies depending on the clinical presentation. Its recommended removal of the prosthetic material but may not be appropriate in unstable or very weak patients.
Objective. To evaluate the density of incidence and general frequency of infection in vascular surgery with grafts and a review of its management.
Material and methods. Descriptive, longitudinal, and study retrospective of 7 years (2010 to 2016) 77 surgeries examined of arterial grafts. It was recorded: density of incidence and therapeutic approach; its mortality and morbidity and a review on the topic.
Results. From 77 patients with grafts, in 7 (6.0%) (2 of them was in another hospital) infection was observed; 4 male and 3 female (an average of old 70 ± 12). The density of incidence of vascular infection was 0.84 (IC = 0.95 to 2.54) and frequency of mortality of 6%. Died 2 (28.5%); amputee 1 (14.2%); in three, in which no withdrew graft and received medical treatment and only one survive (3.5 years) to date. The micro-organisms identified were: E. coli and C. albicans in 2 patients. Staphylococcus aureus and E. epidermidis in other 2 and Klebsiella pneumoniae spp, in one; the rest negative. Survival was 71.4%%.
Conclusions. The density of incidence, frequency of infections and mortality was according to literature. It is important not to remove the prosthesis if the conditions of the patient are critical. Identify each treatment according to the clinical case and early intervention will prevent complications.


REFERENCES

  1. Carrasco-González y cols. Experiencia en el manejo de injertos protésicos expuestos en el Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular del Hospital Regional Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE. Rev Mex Angiol 2009; 37(3): 88-92.

  2. Rosales-Rodríguez M, Jiménez-Martínez T, Domínguez HV, Segura IJM, Días VE. Incidencia y factores de riesgo de las infecciones quirúrgicas de by pass vasculares en el hospital Juan Canalejo de A Coruña en el periodo 2000 a 2002. Rev Esp Sal Púb 2005; 79(1): 59-67.

  3. Cernohorsky P, et al. The relevance of aortic endograft prosthetic infection. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 327-33.

  4. Rodríguez-Jiménez OA. Complicaciones infecciosas posquirúrgicas en Angiología y Cirugía Vascular. Revista Dolor, Foro Nacional de Investigación y Clínica Médica 2012; 8(II): 10-15. Consultado en: www.imbiomed.com.mx.

  5. Martínez-Vázquez C, et al. Infección asociada a prótesis vascular: manejo exitoso sin retirada de prótesis. Rev Clin Esp 2007; 207: 317-21.

  6. Fitzgerald SF, Kellt C, Humphreys H. Diagnosis and Treatment of Prosthetic Aortic Graft Infection: confusion and inconsistency in absence of evidence or consensus. J Antimicrob Chemother 2005; 56(6): 996-9.

  7. Gualtero S, Zambrano AL, Arias G, Silva E. Manejo exitoso de infección de injerto vascular: rol del 18fluorodeoxiglucosa positrón emission tomography computed tomography. Infectio Asociación Colombiana de Infectología. Infection 2016; 20(4): 281-5. Consultado en: http:// www.elsevier.es

  8. Reynoso CJ. El reto de la prótesis vascular infectada. ¿Es posible el éxito sin su retirada? Rev Clin Esp 2007; 207(7): 315-6.

  9. Zertrenne E, et al. Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infection: A Multi-Center Review of Surgical Management. Yale J Biol Med 2007; 80: 113-21.

  10. Hasse B, Husmann L, Zinkernagel A, Weber R, Lachaf M, Mayer D. Vascular graft infections. Swis Med Whly 2013; 143: w13754.

  11. Bolúmar-Montrul F. Medición de los fenómenos de salud y enfermedad en epidemiología. Cap. 7. En: Piedrola Gil. Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública. 10a. Ed. Barcelona, España: Editorial Masson; 2002, pp. 71-8.

  12. Back MR. Infections and antibiotic. Chap. 41. In: Rodney AW, Hollier LH. Vascular Surgery. 2nd Ed. Massachusetts: Ed. Blackwell Publishing; 2005, p.471-92.

  13. Lyons OTA, et al. Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52: 758-63.

  14. Peng DP, D’Amelio FL, Greco SR. Biologic Properties of Venous Access Devices. Chap. 7. In: Wilson ES. Vascular Access. Principles and Practice. Philadelphia, PA 1906 USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (Printed in China); 2010, pp. 47-57.

  15. Pappelbaum KI, et al. Ultralarge von Willebrand factor fibers mediate luminal Staphyolococcus aureus adhesión to an intact endotelial cell layer under shear stress. Circulation 2013; 128(1): 50-9. Consultado en: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

  16. Dinicola S, Grazia DE S, Carlomagno G, Pintucci JP. N-ecetylcysteine as powerful molecule to destroy bacterial. A systematic review. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sc 2014; 18: 2942-8.

  17. Seifert H. The clinical Importance of Microbiological Findings in the Diagnosis and Management of Bloodstream Infections. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 48: S 238-45 (This Supplement is Based on the proceedings of a Novartissponsored session at the Pth International Symposium of Modern Concepts in Endocarditis and Cardiovascular Infections. June 2007; for sponsorship details, see S244.)

  18. Jayakrishnann TT, Keyashian B, Amene J, Malinowski M. Aortic Endograft Infection by Pasteurella Multocida: a rare case. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2016; 50(6): 435-7. Consultado en: www.ncb.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581225.

  19. Etienne H, Touma J, Becquemin JP. Unusual Acute Anset of Abdominal Aortic Endograft Infection by Propionibacterium acnes after Coil Embolization for Type II Endoleak. Ann Vasc Surg 2016; 35: 204. e9.204.211. Consultado en: www.ncb.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27581225.

  20. Guevera-Noriega KA, Velescu A, Zaffalon-Espinal DT, Meteo-Torres E, Roig-Santamaría L. Clara Velasco A. Aorto-bifemoral grafts infection due to Candida parapsilosis An unusual pathogen. Cir Cir 2016. 2D16 Mar 30.pii.s0009-741.1. Consultado en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27039287

  21. Eldin C, et al. Treatment and Prophylactic Strategy for Coxiella burnetii Infection of Aneurysms and Vascular Grafts. A Retrospective Cohort Study. Medicine 2016; 95(12). Consultado en: www.md-Journal.com

  22. Hagiya H, Matsumoto M, Yamasawa T, Haruki Y, Otsuka F. A Case of Vascular Infection Caused by Staphylococcus Lugdnonensis after Femoropliteal Bypass Operation. Acta Med Okayama 2014; 68(3): 171-5.

  23. Moulakakis KG, Sfyroeras GS, Mylonas SN, Mantas G, Papapetrou A, Antonopoulos CN, Kakisis JD, et al. Outcome after preservation of infected abdominal aortic endografts. J Endovasc Ther 2014; 21(3): 448-55. Consultado en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  24. Fukuchi K, Ishida Y, Higashi M, et al. Detection of aortic graft infection by Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: comparison with computed tomographic findings. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 919-25.

  25. Chrapco B, Chrapco M, Nocun A, Stefaniak B, Zubilewiks T, Drop A. Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in diagnosis of inflammatory and infectious vascular disease. Nuclear Med Rev 2016; 19: 28-36. Consultado en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  26. Erb, et al. Surgical and Antimicrobial Treatment of Prosthesic Vascular Graft Infections At Different Surgical Sites: A Retrospective Study of Treatment Outcomes. PLOS ONE 2014; 9: 11/e112947. PLOS ONE / www.plosone.org. Consultado en: https:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  27. Carrasco GH, et al. Experiencia en el manejo de injertos protésicos expuestos en el Servicio de Angiología y Cirugía Vascular del Hospital Regional Lic. Adolfo López Mateos, ISSSTE. Revista Mexicana de Angiología 2009; 3: 88-92.

  28. Hisata Y, et al. Vacuum-assited closure therapy for salvaging a methicillin-resistent Staphylococcus aureus-infected prosthetic graft. Asian J Surg 2014; 37: 46-8. Disponible en: www.ncb.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/-

  29. Nassim A, Thompson MM, Naylor RA, Bell FRP, London MJN. The Impact of MRSA on Vascular Surgery. Eur J Endovasc Surg 2001; 22: 211-14. Doi:10.1053/ ejvs.2001.1429; Disponible en: http// www.idealibrary.com on

  30. Mese B, et al. Efficacy of Linezolid, Teicoplanin, and Vancomycin in Prevention of an Experimental Polytetrafluoroethylene Graft Infection Model caused by Methicyllin- Resistent Staphylococcus. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21: 909-14.

  31. Ruiz-Mercado H, Huerta-Viera M Bustos-SR, Ernesto Sahagún-FE, Hernández-FG, Bravo-CA. Glycophosphopeptical como adyuvante en el tratamiento de lesiones del pie diabético: estudio piloto. Cir Cir 2012; 80: 140-79.

  32. Turtiainen J, Hakala T. Surgical Wound Infections after Peripheral Vascular Surgery. Scandinavian J Surg 2013; 1-6.

  33. Motloch JL, Rottlaender D, Darabi T, Joost I. Erdmann E, Hoppe CU. Conservative Management of Candida Infection of Prosthetic Aortic Graft. Texas Heart Inst J 2011; 38(2): 197-200.

  34. Bandyk FD, Novotney LM, Back RM, Johnson LB, Smacht CD. Expanded application of in situ replacement for prosthetic graft infection. J Vasc Surg 2001; 34(3): 411-9. Discusión 419-20. Consultado en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

  35. Laser A, Baker N, et al. Graft infection after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurism repair. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54: 58-63.

  36. Berger P, Vaartges I, Moll FL, De Borst GJ, Blankensteijn JD, Bots ML. Cumulative Incidence of Graft Infection after Primary Prosthetic Aortic Reconstruction in the Endovascular Era. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015; 49: 581-5.

  37. Smeds M, et al. Treatment and outcomes of aortic endograft infection. J Vasc Surg 2016; I(3):322-40. Consultado en: https:/ /www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed http//www.imedpub.com

  38. Ryu YD, Jung JH, Ramaiah GV, López RAJ, Lee SS. Infected Groin (Graft / Patch): Managed with Sartorious Muscle Flap. Vasc Esp Int 2016; 32(1): 11-6. Consultado en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed

  39. Shiba M, Yanai M, Maeda H, Shiono M. Fatal persistent methicillin-resistent Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and vascular graft infections complicated with the formation of multiple abscesses despite aggressive medical therapy. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports. 2015 Consultado en: http//www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm

  40. Gutierrez J, Albuquerque ALS, Falzon L. HIV infection as vascular risk: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. PloS One. 2017; 12(5):e0176686. Doi: 1371/journal.pone.0176686 e Collection 2017. Consultado en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28493892

  41. Chapman SA, Delgadillo D, Mac Guidwin E, Greenberg JI, Jameson AP. Graft infection Masquerading as Rheumatologic Disease: a Rare Case of Aortobifemoral Graft Infection Presenting as Hypertrophic Osteoarthropathy. Ann Vasc Surg 2017; 41: 283e11283e18. Doi:10.1016/ j.avsg.2016.10.041. Epub 2017 Mar 7. Consultado en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28493892

  42. Bonares MJ, Vaisman A, Sharkawy A. Prosthetic vascular graft infection and prosthetic joint infection caused by Pseudomonas stutzeri. ID Cases. 2016; 4(6): 106.106 e collection 2016 Consultado en: http:// www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28493892

  43. Caceres M, Helpern DE, Hooker RL. Ascending Aortic Graft Pseudoaneurysm With Sternal Erosion: A Presentation of Candida. Ann Thorac Surg 2017; 103(3): e251- e253. Consultado en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 28493892

  44. Pettersson J, Darvapetma A, Gilgren P, Hultqren R. Aortic Graft Infection After Emergency and Non-Emergency Reconstruction: incidence, Treatment, and Long-Term Outcome. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2017; 18(3): 303-10. Consultado en: Http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28493892

  45. Van de Vyver, et al. A novel Mouse Model of Staphylococcus aureus Vascular Graft Infection: Non invasive Imaging Image of Development Vivo. 2017; 137(2): 268-79. Consultado en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/ 28493892




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Angiol. 2017;45