medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Oral

Órgano Ofical de la Facultad de Estomatología de la Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 57

<< Back Next >>

Oral 2017; 18 (57)

Treatment of class III malocclusion and rapid palatal expansion assisted by the use of temporary skeletal anchoring devices

Reyes-Sepúlveda JE, García-Guerra JE, Franco-Ramírez LR, Guzman-de Hoyos AI
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 10
Page: 1488-1491
PDF size: 342.01 Kb.


Key words:

malocclusion, treatment, expansion, palatal, anchorage, skeletal.

ABSTRACT

According to the WHO, in Mexico malocclusions represent a 75 % public health problem in adolescents. The prevalence of Class III Malocclusions in white subjects is approximately 1-5 %, however in Asians it increases to 14 %. The most common orthopedic treatment protocol for the management of Class III Malocclusion is the Rapid Palatal Expansion (EPR) in combination with Facial Mask (MF). The use of temporary anchoring devices (DAT) in maxillary protraction has increased in recent years. The goal of using MF/EPR with temporary anchoring devices is to eliminate side effects and increase skeletal effects. This case describes the approach and management of Class III Malocclusion with Rapid Palatal Expansion assisted by the use of temporary skeletal anchoring devices.


REFERENCES

  1. Caterina Masucci, Lorenzo Franchi, Efisio Defraia, Manuela Mucedero, Paola Cozza, and Tiziano Baccetti. Stability of rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy: A long-term contolled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 140: 493-500.

  2. Bong-Kuen Cha, Dong-Soon Choi, Peter Ngan, Paul-Georg Jost-Brinkmann, Soung-Min Kim, and In-san Jang. Maxillary protraction with miniplates providing skeletal anchorage in a growing Class III patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011; 139: 99-112.

  3. Cagla Sar, Zahire Sahinoglu, Ayca Arman Özcirpici, and Sina Uckand. Dentofacial effects of skeletal anchored treatment modalities for the correction of maxillary retrognathia. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014; 145: 41-54.

  4. Hugo De Clerck, Lucia Cevidanes, and Tiziano Baccetti. Dentofacial effects of bone-anchored maxillary protraction: A controlled study of consecutively treated Class III patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 138: 577-81.

  5. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment and posttreatment craniofacial changes after rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 118: 404-13.

  6. De Clerck HJ, Cornelis MA, Cevidanes LH, Heymann GC, Tulloch CJ. Orthopedic traction of the maxilla with miniplates: a new perspective for treatment of midface deficiency. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 2123-29.

  7. Heymann GC, Cevidanes L, Cornelis M, De Clerck HJ, Tulloch JF. Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010; 137: 274-84.

  8. De Toffol L, Pavoni C, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Cozza P. Orthopedic treatment outcomes in Class III malocclusion. A systematic review. Angle Orthod 2008; 78: 561-73.

  9. B. Giuliano Maino, Emanuele Paoletto, Luca Lombardo, Guiseppe Siciliani. A Three- Dimensional Digital Insertion Guide for Palatal Miniscrew Placement. JCO, Inc 2016.

  10. Karlien Asscherickx, Elke Govaerts, Johan Aerts, and Bart Vande Vannet. Maxillary changes with bone-borne surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion: A prospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016; 149: 374-83.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Oral. 2017;18