medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2017, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2017; 20 (4)

Psychometric properties of the personal religiousness scale in a sample of adults in Puerto Rico

González-Rivera JA
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 26
Page: 1386-1406
PDF size: 495.98 Kb.


Key words:

religiousness, psychometric properties, confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling.

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study are to develop and to analyze the psychometric properties of the Personal Religiousness Scale (ERP) in a sample of Puerto Ricans adults. A total of 506 Puerto Ricans participated in this psychometric study. I analyze the psychometric properties of the ERP with confirmatory factor analysis using structural equation modeling and reliability analysis. The results indicate that the scale fits better to a multidimensional model of two factors. These factors were denominated Religious Beliefs/Attitudes and Religious Practices. The reliability index of the scale was .96. These results suggest that the ERP has the potential to measure this construct among Puerto Rican adults. Likewise, the ERP will advance further research of the phenomenon of religiousness in Puerto Rico.


REFERENCES

  1. Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Psychology Press.

  2. Crocker, L., y Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart y Winston.

  3. Garssen, B., Visser, A., y Jager Meezenbroek, E. (2016). Examining Whether Spirituality Predicts Subjective Well-Being: How to Avoid Tautology. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 8, 141-148.

  4. González-Rivera, J.A. (2015). Espiritualidad en la Clínica: Integrando la Espiritualidad en la Psicoterapia y la Consejería. San Juan, P.R.: Ediciones Psicoespiritualidad.

  5. González-Rivera, J.A. (2016). Relación entre la Espiritualidad y el Bienestar Subjetivo en una Muestra de Adultos Puertorriqueños de Ambos Géneros (Disertación doctoral inédita). Universidad Carlos Albizu, San Juan, Puerto Rico.

  6. González-Rivera, J.A., Quintero, N., Veray, J., y Rosario, A. (2016). Relación entre la Espiritualidad, las Prácticas Religiosas y el Bienestar Psicológico. Manuscrito sometido para publicación.

  7. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. y Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice-Hall.

  8. Hill, P. C., Pargament, K. I., Hood, R. W., Jr., McCullough, M. E., Swyers, J. P., Larson, D. B., y Zinnbauer, B. J. (2000). Conceptualizing religion and spirituality: Points of commonality, points of departure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 30, 51–77.

  9. Kline, P. (2000). The Handbook of Psychometric Testing. New York: Routledge.

  10. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.

  11. Kline, T. J. (2005). Psychological Testing: A Practical Approach to Design and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

  12. Koenig, H.G. (2008). Concerns about Measuring “Spirituality” in Research. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196(5), 349-355.

  13. Koenig, H.G. (2009). Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: A review. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54(5), 283-291.

  14. Koenig, H.G., McCullough, M. y Larson, D.B. (2001). Handbook of Religion and Health: A Century of Research Reviewed. New York: Oxford University Press.

  15. Littlewood Zimmerman, H.F. y Bernal García, E.R. (2011). Mi Primer Modelamiento de Ecuación Estructural: LISREL. Medellín, Colombia: Centro de Investigaión en Comportamiento Organizacional (CINCEL).

  16. Marsh, H. W., Balla, J. R., y Hau, K.-T. (1996). An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical properties. En G. A. Marcoulides y R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 315-357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  17. Pagán-Torres, O.M, Sánchez-Galarza, A.N., Tollinchi-Natali, N., y González- Rivera, J.A. (2017). Evaluando la Relación entre la Religiosidad y la Salud Mental en Puerto Rico: Una Revisión Sistemática. Manuscrito sometido para publicación.

  18. Pargament, K. I. (1997). The Psychology of Religion and Coping: Theory, Research, Practice. New York: Guilford Press.

  19. Pargament, K. I. (1999). The psychology of religion and spirituality? Yes and no. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 9, 3-16.

  20. Pargament, K. I. (2002). The bitter and the sweet: An evaluation of the costs and benefits of religiousness. Psychological Inquiry, 13, 168-181.

  21. Pargament, K. I. (2007). Spiritually Integrated Psychotherapy: Understanding and Addressing the Sacred. New York: Guilford Press.

  22. Piedmont, R. L. (1999). Does Spirituality Represent the Sixth Factor of Personality? Spiritual Transcendence and the Five‐Factor Model. Journal of Personality, 67, 985-1013.

  23. Quiceno, J.M., y Vinaccia, S. (2011). Creencias-Prácticas y Afrontamiento Espiritual-Religioso y Características Sociodemográficas en Enfermos Crónicos. Psychologia: Avances de la Disciplina, 5, 25-36.

  24. Reyes-Estrada, M., Rivera, E., Ramos, A., Rosario, E., y Rivera, C. (2014). Desarrollo y validación de una escala para medir religiosidad en una muestra de adultos en Puerto Rico. Revista Puertorriqueña de Psicología, 25(2), 226-242.

  25. Schumacker, R. E., y Lomax, R. G. (2010). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

  26. Zwingman, C., Klein, C., y Büssing, A. (2011). Measuring religiosity/spirituality: Theoretical differentiations and categorization of instruments. Religions, 2, 345-357.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2017;20