medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2018; 60 (2)

Validation of a scale of health beliefs about type 1 diabetes for the Mexican context: HBM-T1DM.

Calderón C, Carrete L, Vera J

Language: Spanish
References: 29
Page: 175-183
PDF size: 389.24 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To generate a scale to measure health beliefs among Mexican adolescents and young people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) to determine the extent to which they affect adherence to treatment and to be able to develop more effective social marketing campaigns. Materials and methods. Based on the Health Belief Model (HBM), a scale was generated; three field tests were applied, and it was administered in two regions of Mexico to young people with type 1 diabetes. Tests of reliability, stability, convergence-discrimination and predictive validity were developed. Results. The main predictor is perceived barriers to treatment adherence, followed by self-efficacy to disease control, susceptibility/vulnerability to disease complications and perceived benefits of treatment. Conclusion. This scale may be especially useful for better monitoring young Mexican patients with T1DM and prevent sequelae of disease.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Informe mundial sobre la diabetes [Internet]. Geneva: OMS, 2016 [citado julio 9, 2016]. Disponible en: http:// www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/es/

  2. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Health at a Glance 2009, OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2009:200.

  3. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Health at a glance 2011, OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2011:199.

  4. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Health at a glance 2013: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2013:210.

  5. Secretaría de Salud. Estrategia Nacional para la Prevención y el Control del Sobrepeso, la Obesidad y la Diabetes. México, D.F: IEPSA, 2013:103.

  6. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 7th ed. Bruselas: International Diabetes Federation, 2015:142.

  7. Rivera A. Piden Tratamiento Integral para Diabetes Tipo 1 [Internet]. El Universal. México, D.F. 10 de noviembre de 2015 [citado nov 15, 2015]. Disponible en: http://www.eluniversal.com.mx/articulo/nacion/sociedad/ 2015/11/10/piden-tratamiento-integral-para-diabetes-tipo-1

  8. Ellis DA, Podolski CL, Frey M, Naar-King S, Wang B, Moltz K. The role of parental monitoring in adolescent health outcomes: Impact on regimen adherence in youth with type 1 diabetes. J Pediatr Psychol. 2007;32(8):907-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jsm009

  9. Lerman-Garber I, Barrón-Uribe C, Calzada-León R, Mercado-Atri M, Vidal-Tamayo R, Quintana S, et al. Emotional dysfunction associated with diabetes in Mexican adolescents and young adults with type-1 diabetes. Salud Publica Mex. 2003;45(1):13-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036- 36342003000100002

  10. Ortiz Parada M. Estabilidad de la adherencia al tratamiento en una muestra de adolescentes diabéticos tipo 1. Ter Psicológica. 2008;26(1):71- 80. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082008000100006

  11. Bond G, Aiken L, Somersville S. The health belief model and adolescents with insulin – dependent diabetes mellitus. Heal Psychol. 1992;11(3):190-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.11.3.190

  12. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. The Health Belief Model and HIV risk behavior change. In: DiClemente RJ, Peterson JL, editors. Preventing AIDS: Theories and Methods of Behavioral Interventions. New York: Springer US, 1994:5-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-1193-3_2

  13. Champion VL, Skinner CS. The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, K. V, eds. Health Behaviour and Health Education Theory, Research, and Practice. 4th Edition. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2008:45-65.

  14. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11(1):1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101

  15. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social Learning Theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988;15(2):175-83. https://doi. org/10.1177/109019818801500203

  16. Bandura A. Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In: Urdan FP& T, ed. Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, 2006:307-37.

  17. Alogna M. Perception of severity of disease and health locus of control in compliant and noncompliant diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 1980;3(4):533-4. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.3.4.533

  18. Cerkoney KA, Hart LK. The relationship between the health belief model and compliance of persons with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1980;3(5):594-8. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.3.5.594

  19. Given CW, Given BA, Gallin RS, Condon JW. Development of scales to measure beliefs of diabetic patients. Res Nurs Health. 1983;6(3):127-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770060306

  20. Harris R, Linn MW, Skyler JS, Sandifer R. Development of the diabetes health belief scale. Diabetes Educ. 1987;13(3):292-7. https://doi. org/10.1177/014572178701300310

  21. Brownlee-Duffeck M, Peterson L, Simonds J, Goldstein D, Kilo C, Hoette S. The role of health beliefs in the regimen adherence and metabolic control of adolescents and adults with diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987;55(2):139-44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022- 006X.55.2.139

  22. Lewis K, Bradley C. Measures of Diabetes-Specific Health Beliefs. In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: a guide to psychological measurement in diabetes research and practice. New York: Routledge, 2013:247-90.

  23. Bradley C, Brewin C, Gamsu D, Moses J. Development of scales to measure perceived control of diabetes mellitus and diabetesrelated health beliefs. Diabet Med. 1984;1(3):213-8. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.1984.tb01955.x

  24. Bradley C. Measures of Perceived Control of Diabetes. In: Bradley C, ed. Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice. New York: Routledge, 2013:291-334.

  25. Gliem JA, Gliem RR. Calculating, Interpreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. In: Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education. Columbus: The Ohio State University, 2003:82-8.

  26. Littlefield CH, Craven JL, Rodin GM, Daneman D, Murray MA, Rydall AC. Relationship of self-efficacy and bingeing to adherence to diabetes regimen among adolescents. Diabetes Care. 1992;15(1):90-4. https://doi. org/10.2337/diacare.15.1.90

  27. Johanson GA, Brooks GP. Initial scale development: sample size for pilot studies. Educ Psychol Meas. 2009;70(3):394-400. https://doi. org/10.1177/0013164409355692

  28. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4(4):287-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.185

  29. Cheng H, Kotler P, Lee NR. Social Marketing for Public Health: Global Trends and Success Stories. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Barlett Publishers, 2011:450.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com