medigraphic.com
Coordinación General de Investigación de la Facultad de Salud Pública y Nutrición y la Dirección General de Sistemas e Informática de la Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León

2018, Number 1

Rev Salud Publica Nutr 2018; 17 (1)

Comparison of perceived weight as ideal against ideal body weight formulas and body mass index of 22 kg/m2 in young adult women

Ramirez LE, Puente HD, Negrete LNL, Serna-Gutierrez A, Calderón-Ramos Z, Omaña-Covarrubias A, Flores-Guillen E, Tijerina-Sáenz A

Language: English
References: 20
Page: 7-15
PDF size: 271.27 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Formulas of ideal body weight (IBW) including the body mass index (BMI) of 22 kg/m2 are used under the assumption to provide a healthy weight. Objective: We compare the perceived ideal body weight (PIBW) with the calculated IBW by formulas and the BMI of 22. Methods: We recruited 705 women (20-25 y). Six common formulas and 2 published equations by our team were used. Results: Group regression analysis determined that including the frame size improves the agreement of formulas of Robinson et al, Hammond and Hamwi with the PIBW (p›0.05). Individually, the concordance analysis (higher % of differences ‹2 kg: PIBW - IBW by formula), determined that for a measured BMI ‹20, only the Faspyn 1 formula needs to be adjusted by frame size; while Robinson et al, Hammond, Tokunaga (BMI of 22), Faspyn 2 (BMI of 22) and Broca, are equivalent with the PIBW in different intervals of BMI. Conclusions: According to the BMI perceived as overweight (23.8 kg/m2) and perceived as ideal (21.1 kg/m2), caution is suggested when using the IBW formulas for BMI of 22 as a diagnosis. The IBW formulas and BMI of 22 does not necessarily represent a desirable or aesthetic weight.


REFERENCES

  1. Bhanji S, Khuwaja AK, Siddiqui F, Azam I, Kazmi K. Underestimation of weight and its associated factors among overweight and obese adults in Pakistan: a cross sectional study. BMC Public Health., 11(363): 1-8, 2011.

  2. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res., 8(2): 135- 60, 1999.

  3. Bonafini BA, Pozzilli P. Body weight and beauty: the changing face of the ideal female body weight. Obes Rev., 12(1): 62-5, 2011.

  4. Bouillanne O, Morineau G, Dupont C, Coulombel I, Vincent JP, Nicolis I, Benazeth S, Cynober L, Aussel C. Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index: a new index for evaluating at-risk elderly medical patients. Am J Clin Nutr., 82(4): 777-83, 2005.

  5. Casillas L, Vargas LA. Height and weight charts for Mexican adults. Arch Invest Med., 11(1): 157-741980. Craig PL, Caterson ID. Weight and perceptions of body image in women and men in a Sydney sample. Community Health Stud., 14(4): 373-831990.

  6. Crawford D, Campbell K. Lay definitions of ideal weight and overweight. Int J Obes., 23(7): 738-45, 1999. Donath SM. Who's overweight? Comparison of the medical definition and community views. Med J Aust., 172(8): 375-7, 2000.

  7. Engstrom JL, Paterson SA, Doherty A, Trabulsi M, Speer KL. Accuracy of self-reported height and weight in women: an integrative review of the literature. J Midwifery Womens Health., 48(5): 338-45, 2003.

  8. Frisancho AR. Anthropometric Standards for the Assessment of Growth Nutritional Status. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press; 1990.

  9. Global Database on Body Mass Index. BMI classification. United States of America: World Health Organization; 2006. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/bmi/index.jsp?introPage=intro_3.h tml.

  10. Kuczmarski RJ, Flegal KM. Criteria for definition of overweight in transition: background and recommendations for the United States. Am J Clin Nut., 72(5): 1074-812000.

  11. Lohmann TG, Roche AF, Martorell R. Anthropometric Standarization Reference Manual. Champaign: Human Kinetics Book; 1988.

  12. Pai MP, Paloucek FP. The origin of the “ideal” body weight equations. Ann Pharmacother., 34(9): 1066-9, 2000.

  13. Passing H, Bablok W. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in clinical chemistry, Part I. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem., 21(11): 709-720, 1983.

  14. Ramírez E, Negrete NL, Tijerina A. El peso corporal saludable: definición y cálculo en diferentes grupos de edad. RESPyN., 13(4), 2012.

  15. Robinson MF, Watson PE. Day-to-day variations in body- weight of young women. Br J Nutr., 19: 225-35, 1965.

  16. Rookus MA, Burema J, Deurenberg P, Van der Wiel- Wetzels WA. The impact of adjustment of a weight- height index (W/H2) for frame size on the prediction of body fatness. Br J Nutr., 54(2): 335-42, 1985.

  17. Rössner S. Paul Pierre Broca (1824-1880). Obes Rev., 8(3): 277, 2007.

  18. Shan B, Sucher K, Hollenbeck CB. Comparison of ideal body weight equations and published height-weight tables with body mass index tables for healthy adults in the United States. Nutr Clin Pract., 21(3): 312-9, 2006. 18. Tokunaga K, Matsuzawa Y, Kotani K, Keno Y, Kobatake T, Fujioka S, Tarui S. Ideal body weight estimated from the body mass index with the lowest morbidity. Int J Obes., 15(1): 1-5, 1991.

  19. U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th Edition. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office; 2010.

  20. Width M, Reinhard T. The Clinical Dietitian´s Essential Pocket Guide. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com