Mulet PAM, Mulet GAM, González FJ

Language: Spanish
References: 0
Page: 1065-1104
PDF size: 599.32 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: there have been cases of misuse of the term syndrome in diagnostic discussion at the University Hospital of Holguin V.I. Lenin, which may be due to several factors.
Objective: to identify, according to expert criteria, if there are cases of inappropriate use of the term syndrome in the diagnostic discussion in other provinces of Cuba, its negative repercussion in the medical diagnosis, main manifestations of the inadequate use, probable causes, need of consensus and of conceptual replacement.
Method: descriptive observational study with methodological triangulation. Intentional sample of 15 experts from different provinces, assistant or master professors, master, doctor of science or both and specialists of first or second degree on internal medicine, who answered, electronically, a survey with various items and questions, Likert Scale. The survey was statistically validated; the data were processed using the median and quartiles using: anova test, Kendall correlation coefficient and cluster analysis.
Results: the majority of experts agreed that there are cases of inadequate use of the term syndrome in diagnostic discussions, its negative repercussion in the medical diagnosis, possible causes, need for consensus with some divergences, among three groups of experts, regarding forms of manifestation, other influential factors and especially on the extension of the syndrome concept, through the inclusion of signs of complementary examinations and their possible consequence in the algorithm of the clinical method.
Conclusions: although most experts agreed on the existence of inappropriate use of the term syndrome and other related aspects, the existence of divergences, especially on the conceptual replacement of the term and its repercussion in the diagnostic process, suggests the existence of a heterodox school (minority), an orthodox or traditional school (majority) and an eclectic school, intermediate in number of experts.