2018, Number S1
Rev Mex Anest 2018; 41 (S1)
Endotracheal tube versus supraglottic devices in general obstetric anaesthesia
Ramírez-Rio de la Loza M
Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 32-33
PDF size: 125.56 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Farber MK, Chow L, Kodali B. Airway management of the pregnant patient at delivery. UpToDate. Feb 2017.
Geng ZY, Wang DX. Laryngeal mask airway for cesarean delivery: a 5-year retrospective cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2017;130:404-408.
Weinberger SE. Maternal adaptations to pregnancy: Physiologic respiratory changes and dyspnea. UpToDate. Jan 2018.
Mushambi MC, Kinsella SM, Popat M, Swales H, Ramaswamy KK, Winton AL, et al. Obstetric Anaesthetists’ Association and Difficult Airway Society guidelines for the management of difficult and failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:1286-1306.
Li SY, Yao WY, Yuan YJ, Tay WS, Han NR, Sultana R, et al. Supreme™ laryngeal mask airway use in general Anesthesia for category 2 and 3 Cesarean delivery: a prospective cohort study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2017;17:169.
Panneer M, Babu S, Murugaiyan P. Comparison of I-gel versus endotracheal tube in patients undergoing elective cesarean section: a prospective randomized control study. Anesth Essays Res. 2017;11:930-933.
Full text