medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Abanico Veterinario

ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2018; 8 (3)

Estrus synchronization in ewes with PGF2α and biostimulated with “male effect”

Cadena-Villegas S, Arévalo-Díaz M, Gallegos-Sánchez J, Hernández-Marín A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 94-105
PDF size: 456.52 Kb.


Key words:

Prolificity, fecundity, fertility, sheep production, Ovis aries.

ABSTRACT

Biostimulation with "male effect" (ME) and its response in estrus synchronization in wool sheep was evaluated with a protocol based on the administration of prostaglandin (PGF2α) in the reproductive season. Twenty-four Suffolk and 29 Rideau Arcott adult sheep were used, which were randomized to one of two treatments (T): T1, n = 25: control sheep, synchronized with two applications of PGF2α with a seven-day interval, and T2, n = 28: similar to T1, but with the difference that the ram was introduced on day four, after the first administration of PGF2α, to perform ME. The estrus response, estrus onset, gestation and calving percentage, fertility, prolificacy, and fecundity were evaluated. There were no differences (P› 0.05) between the response to estrus, the percentages of gestation and calving, and fertility, among treatments. The onset of estrus, prolificacy and fecundity were higher (P ‹0.05) in the sheep of T2 with respect to the females of T1. We concluded that biostimulation with "male effect" in sheep synchronized with a protocol based on prostaglandins improves estrus onset, prolificacy, and fecundity in wool breeds.


REFERENCES

  1. ABECIA, JA, F Forcada, A González-Bulnes. 2011. Pharmaceutical control of reproduction in sheep and goats. Veterinary Clinics Food Animal Practice. 27: 67-79. DOI: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2010.10.001.

  2. ABECIA, JA, F Forcada, A González-Bulnes. 2012. Hormonal control of reproduction in small ruminants. Animal Reproduction Science. 130: 173-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2012.01.011.

  3. ÁLVAREZ, RAG, RO Rodríguez, LJJ Hernández. 1994. Sincronización del estro en la borrega Pelibuey con la utilización de prostaglandina PGF2alfa. Técnica Pecuaria México. 32: 25-29.

  4. http://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/3646/3066

  5. ÁLVAREZ, RL, LA Zarco. 2001. Los fenómenos de bioestimulación sexual en ovejas y cabras. Ciencia Veterinaria México. 32(2):117-129. http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/rvm/vol32-02/RVM32205.pdf

  6. ARROYO J, H Magaña-Sevilla, MA Camacho-Escobar. 2009. Regulación neuroendocrina del anestro posparto en la oveja. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 10: 301-312. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/939/93912996001.pdf

  7. COGNIE, Y, F Gayerie, CM Oldham, P Poindron. 1980. Increased ovulation rate at the ram-induced ovulation and its comercial aplication. Animal Production in Australia. pp. 80-86. http://www.asap.asn.au/livestocklibrary/1980/Cognie80.PDF

  8. CONTRERAS-SOLÍS, I, B Vásquez, T Díaz, C Letelier, A López-Sebastian, A González-Bulnes. 2009. Ovarian and endocrine responses in tropical sheep treated with reduced doses of cloprostenol. Animal Reproduction Science. 114: 384-392. DOI: 0.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.10.013.

  9. DAVIS, AJ, IR Fleet, FA Harrison, FMM Walker. 1980. Pulmonary metabolism of prostaglandin F2α in the conscious non-pregnant ewe and sow. Journal Physiology. 301: 86. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=US201301345856

  10. DELGADILLO, JA, JF Vielma, JG Veliz, G Duarte, H Hernández. 2008. La calidad del estímulo emitido por el macho determina la respuesta de las cabras sometidas al efecto macho. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 9: 39-45. http://www.redalyc.org/html/939/93911227004/

  11. FIERRO, S, J Gil, C Viñoles, J Olvera-Muzante. 2013. The use of prostaglandins in controlling estrous cicle of the ewe: A review. Theriogenology. 79: 399-408 DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2012.10.022

  12. FIERRO, S, J Olivera-Muzante, J Gil, C. Viñoles. 2011. Effects of prostaglandin administration on ovarian folicular dynamics, conception, prolificacy, and fecundity in sheep. Theriogenology. 76: 630-639. DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.03.016.

  13. GARCÍA, E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Köppen (para adaptarlo a las condiciones de la República Mexicana) 5ª Ed. Instituto de Geografía. UNAM. México. ISBN: 970-32-1010-4.

  14. GODFREY, RW, JR, Collins, EL, Hensley, JE, Wheaton. 1999. Estrus synchronization and artificial insemination of hair sheep in the tropics. Theriogenology. 51:985–997. https://www.theriojournal.com/article/S0093-691X(99)00044-8/pdf

  15. HAWKEN, PAR, AP Beard, CM O’Meara, P Duffy, KM Quinn, TF Crosby, MP Boland, ACO Evans. 2005. The effects of ram exposure during progestogen oestrus synchronisation and time of ram introduction post progestagen withdrawal on fertility in ewes. Theriogenology. 63: 860-871. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.05.007

  16. HAWKEN, PAR, GB Martin. 2012. Sociosexual stimuli and gonadotropin-releasing hormone/luteinizing hormone secretion in sheep and goats. Domestic Animal Endocrinology. 43: 85-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2012.03.005.

  17. HERNÁNDEZ, CJ, J Valencia, L Zarco. 2001. Regresión del cuerpo lúteo y presentación del estro en ovejas con dos inyecciones de prostaglandina con 8 días de intervalo. Técnica Pecuaria México. 39: 53-58.

  18. http://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/view/1334/1329

  19. HERNÁNDEZ-MARÍN, JA, M Valencia-Posadas, JE Ruíz-Nieto, AI Mireles-Arriaga, C Cortez-Romero, J Gallegos-Sánchez. 2017. Contribución de la ovinocultura al sector pecuario en México. Agroproductividad. 10 (3): 87-93. http://www.colpos.mx/wb/index.php/agroproductividad

  20. KEISLER, DH. 2007. Sheep breeding strategies. In: Youngquist, R.S., Threlfall, W.R. (eds.), Current Therapy in Large Animal. Theriogenology. WB Saunders Co., Pennsylvania, pp. 649–661. ISBN: 9780721693231; E-ISBN: 9781437713404.

  21. KNIGHT, TW. 1983. Ram induced stimulation of ovarian and oestrous activity in anoestrous ewes. A review. Procedings of the N.Z. Society of Animal Production. 43: 7-10. http://www.nzsap.org/system/files/proceedings/1983/ab83002.pdf

  22. LETELIER, CA, I Contreras-Solis, RA García-Fernández, MA Sánchez, P García-Palencia, B Sánchez, C Ariznavarreta, JAF Tresguerres, JM Flores, A Gonzalez-Bulnes. 2011. Effects of oestrus induction with progestagens or prostaglandin analogues on ovarian and pituitary function in sheep. Animal Reproduction Science. 126: 61-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.04.012

  23. MALEJANE, CM, JPC Greyling, MB Raito. 2014. Seasonal variation in semen quality of Dorper rams using different collection techniques. South African Journal of Animal Science. 44: 26-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v44i1.4

  24. MARTIN, GB, JTB Milton, RH Davidson, GE Banchero, DR Lindsay, D Blache. 2004. Natural methods of increasing reproductive efficiency in sheep and goats. Animal Reproduction Science. 82-83: 231-46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2004.05.014

  25. MEILÁN, J, R Ungerfeld. 2014. Does introduction of rams during the late luteal phasepromote the estrus response in cyclic ewes? Short comunication. Small Ruminant Research. 120: 116-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2014.03.011

  26. OLIVERA-MUZANTE, J, J Gil, C Viñoles, S. Fierro. 2013. Reproductive outcome with

  27. GnRH inclusion at 24 or 36 h following a prostaglandin F2-based protocol for timed AI in ewes. Animal Reproduction Science. 138: 175-179. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2013.02.013.

  28. RUSSEL, AJF, JM Doney, RG Gunn. 1969. Subjective assessment of fat in live sheep. J. Agr. Sci. 72: 451-454. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600024874

  29. SAGARPA (Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación). Diario Oficial de la Federación. Norma Oficial Mexicana 024 y 033-ZOO-1995. http://sagarpa.gob.mx/normateca/normateca2/SENASICA%20NORM%2028.pdf y http://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=4883147&fecha=16/10/1995

  30. SAS Institute. 2010. Statistical Analysis Software SAS/STAT®. version 9.0.2, Cary, N.C., USA: SAS Institute Inc., ISBN: 978-1-60764-599-3, Disponible: http://www.sas.com/en_us/software/analytics/stat.html#

  31. SCARAMUZZI, RJ, L Oujagir, JB Menassol, S Freret, A Piezel, HM Brown, J Cognié, C Fabre-Nys. 2013. The pattern of LH secretion and the ovarian response to the ‘ram effect’ in the anoestrous ewe is influenced by body condition but not by short-term nutritional supplementation. Reproduction Fertility and Development. 26(8): 1154-1165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1071/RD13139

  32. UNGERFELD, R. 2011. Combination of the ram effect with PGF2α estrous synchronization treatments in ewes during the breeding season. An. Rep. Sci. 124:65–68. DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2011.02.021

  33. UNGERFELD, R, B Carbajal, E Rubianes, M Forsberg. 2005. Endocrine and Ovarian Changes in Response to the Ram Effect in Medroxyprogesterone Acetate-primed Corriedale Ewes During the Breeding and Nonbreeding Season. Acta Vet. Scand. 46: 33-44. DOI: 10.1186/1751-0147-46-33

  34. VILARIÑO, M, E Rubianes, E van Lier, A Menchaca. 2010. Serum progesterone concentrations, follicular development and time of ovulation using a new progesterone releasing device (DICO®) in sheep. Small Ruminant Research. 91: 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.02.014




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

AbanicoVet. 2018;8