medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Abanico Veterinario

ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2018; 8 (3)

Description of the winter habitat of grassland birds with remote sensors and visual estimation

Montes-Aldaba A, Martínez-Guerrero J, López-Serrano P, Pereda-Solís M, Strasser E
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 37
Page: 106-117
PDF size: 389.50 Kb.


Key words:

Grasshopper sparrow, Baird Sparrow, remote sensing, supervised classification, vegetation.

ABSTRACT

Understanding habitat preferences of grassland birds declining is important for their conservation. Currently, the use of remote sensing technology to describe the habitat of grassland birds is a novel tool in México which may allow for more accurate assessments of grassland habitat. We used both, high-resolution photographs and a protocol established by Bird Conservancy of the Rockies that uses ocular estimation in order to estimate vegetation cover within areas where individual sparrows of the genus Ammodramus were recorded in two sites located in Durango. We radio tracked individuals of A. bairdii (n=33) and A. savannarum (n=23) daily (n=1881) and randomly selected 40 location points. Vegetation metric was obtained and from high-resolution photographs we created an orthomosaic with supervised classification in 4 classes of vegetation cover (%). At each bird location point, we estimated the percentage of each vegetation cover class within a 5 m radius area around the point. We did not find a significant difference between vegetation cover obtained by a high-resolution photographs or ocular estimations (p≤0.05) by species. Both species were found in areas with grass cover similar to those reported using different methods (61.24±4.07%, 62.78±4.24%). These results indicate that the use of remote sensing provide favorable information for the characterization of grassland bird’s habitat.


REFERENCES

  1. ANDERSON K, Gastón KJ. 2013. Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Front Ecol Environ. 11(3): 138-146. DOI: 10.1890/120150

  2. BERLANGA H, Kennedy JA, Rich TD, Arizmendi MC, Beardmore CJ, Blancher PJ, Butcher GS, Couturier AR, Dayer AA, Demarest DW, Easton WE, Gustafson M, Iñigo-Elias E, Krebs EA, Panjabi AO, Rodriguez-Contreras V, Rosenberg KV, Ruth JM, Santana-Castellon E, Vidal RMa, Will T. 2010. Conservando a nuestras aves compartidas: la visión trinacional de Compañeros en Vuelo para la conservación de las aves terrestres. Cornell Lab. of Ornithology: Ithaca, N.Y. U.S.A. 49 p. http://www.savingoursharedbirds.org/final_reports_pdfs/PIF2010%20Spanish%20FINAL_small.pdf

  3. BIBBY C, Jones M, Marsden S. 1998. Expedition field techniques: Birds surveys. Royal Geographical Society. London, U.K. ISBN 978-0-907649-79-3

  4. CEC (Commission for Environmental Cooperation) and The Nature Conservancy (TNC). 2005. North American central grasslands priority conservation areas: technical report and documentation. Eds J.W. Karl and J. Hoth. Commission for Environmental Cooperation and The Nature Conservancy. Montreal, Quebec. http://www3.cec.org/islandora/es/item/2568-north-american-grassland-priority-conservation-areas-en.pdf

  5. DAUBENMIRE R. 1959. A canopy-coverage method of vegetational analysis. Northwest Science 33:43–64.

  6. DE LEÓN-MATA D, Pinedo-Álvarez A, Martínez JH. 2014. Aplicación de sensores remotos en el análisis de la fragmentación del paisaje en Cuchillas de la Zarca, México. Investigaciones Geográficas Boletín. No 84. Instituto de Geografía UNAM. 42-53 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.14350/rig.36568

  7. FISHER R, Davis S 2010. From Wiens to Robel: A review of grassland bird habitat selection. J. of Wild. Manage. 74(2) 265-273. https://doi.org/10.2193/2009-020

  8. GASTÓN A, Ciudad C, Mateo-Sánchez MC, García-Viñas JI, López-Leiva C, Fernández-Landa A, Marchamalo M, Cuevas J, De la Fuente B, Fortin MJ, Saura Santiago. 2017. Species’ habitat use inferred from environmental variables at multiple scales: how much we gain from high- resolution vegetation data? Int. J. Appl. Earth Observat. Geoinform. 55, 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2016.10.007

  9. GUTTERY M, Ribic C, Sample D, Paulius A, Trosen C, Dadisman J, Shcneider D, Horton J. 2016. Scale-specific habitat relationships influence patch occupancy: defining neighborhoods to optimize the effectiveness of landscape-scale grassland bird Conservation. Landscape ecol. DOI 10.1007/s10980-016-0462-y

  10. HEINRICH J, Aldridge C, O´Donell M, Schumaker N. 2017. Using dynamic population simulations to extend resource selection analyses and prioritize habitats for conservation. Ecol. Mod. Vol. 359, 449-459. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.05.017

  11. HINTZE, J. 2001. NCSS and PASS, Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Keysville, Utah, U.S.A. WWW.NCSS.com IGL LD, Ballard BM. 1999. Habitat associations of migrating and overwintering grassland birds in southern Texas. The Condor 101:771–782. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/condor/v101n04/p0771-p0782.pdf

  12. JOHNSON MD. 2007. Measuring habitat quality: a review. Condor 109:489–504. https://doi.org/10.1650/8347.1

  13. MACÍAS-DUARTE A, Montoya AB, Mendez-Gonzalez CE, Rodriguez-Salazar JR, Hunt WG, Krannitz PG. 2009. Factors influencing habitat use by migratory grassland birds in the state of Chihuahua, Mexico. Auk 126:896-905. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.08251

  14. MACÍAS-DUARTE A, Panjabi AO, Pool D, Youngberg E, Levandoski G. 2011. Wintering Grassland Bird Density in Chihuahuan Desert Grassland Priority Conservation Areas, 2007-2011. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, RMBO Technical Report I-NEOTROP-MXPLAT-10-2. 164 p. https://birdconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/2011_Chihuahuan_Desert_Grassland_Bird_report_with_appendixAB.pdf

  15. MACÍAS-DUARTE A, Panjabi AO. 2013. Association of habitat characteristics with winter survival of a declining grassland bird in Chihuahuan Desert grasslands of Mexico. The Auk 130(1):141-149. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2012.12047

  16. MACÍAS-DUARTE A, Panjabi AO, Strasser EH, Levandoski GJ, Ruvalcaba-Ortega I, Doherty PF, Ortega-RC. 2017. Winter survival of North American grassland birds is driven by weather and grassland condition in the Chihuahuan Desert. Vol.88 (4):374-386. J. of Field Ornithol. DOI: 10.1111/jofo.12226

  17. MARTÍNEZ JH, Wehenkel C, Pereda ME, Panjabi AO, Levandoski G, Corral JJ, Díaz R. 2011. Relación entre la coberturara del suelo y atributos de la vegetación invernal con Ammodramus bairdii, Audubon 1844, en el noroeste de México. Agrociencia; 45: 443-451. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1405-31952011000400004

  18. NACBI (North American Bird Conservation Initiative), The State of North America’s Birds 2016. Environment and Climate Change Canada: Ottawa, Ontario. 8 p. Cat. No.: CW66-527/2016E ISBN: 978-0-660-05104-8www.stateofthebirds.org

  19. PANJABI A, Youngberg E, Levandoski G. 2010. Wintering Grassland Bird Density in Chihuahua Desert Grassland Priority Conservation Areas, 2007-2010. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, RMBO Technical Report I-MXPLAT-08-03. 83 p. https://birdconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/2011_Chihuahuan_Desert_Grassland_Bird_report_with_appendixAB.pdf

  20. PANJABI A, Beyer L. 2010. Desert Grassland Bird Conservation: Is low winter survival driving population declines? Phase II. Rocky Mountain Bird Observatory, Brighton, CO, Final report I-MXPLAT-NPS-08-02. 10 p. https://birdconservancy.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Grassland-Bird-Survival-Phase-2_2010-Annual-Report.pdf

  21. PÉREZ DJ. 2007. Laboratorio de Tectónica Andina. Retrieved from Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales. http://aviris.gl.fcen.uba.ar/Curso_SR/Guia_Curso_sr_2007.pdf

  22. PEITZ DG. 2007. Grassland bird monitoring at Herbert Hoover National historic site, Iowa; 2005-2006 State report. U.S. Department of Interior. National Park Service. Fort Collins Co. U.S.A. 29 p. https://irma.nps.gov/DataStore/DownloadFile/152755

  23. POOL BD, Panjabi A, Macías-Duarte A, Soljhem D. 2014. Rapid Expansion of Croplands in Chihuahua, Mexico Threatens Declining North American Grassland Bird Species. Biological Conservation; 170:274-281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016

  24. RAPPOLE JH, Tipton AR. 1991. New harness design for attachment of radio transmitters to small passerines. Journal of Field Ornithology; 62(3):335-337. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/jfo/v062n03/p0335-p0337.pdf

  25. RICHARDS JA. 1999. Remote sensing digital image analysis: An introduction. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. ISBN 978-3-642-30062-2

  26. ROBEL RJ, Briggs JN, Dayton AD, and Hulbert LC. 1970. Relationships between visual obstruction measurements and weight of grassland vegetation. Journal of Range Management 23:295–297

  27. RODRÍGUEZ-MATURINO A, Martinez-Guerrero JH, Chairez-Hernandez I, Pereda-Solís M, Pinedo-Álvarez A. 2017. Variables del hábitat de pastizal asociadas a la densidad de aves granívoras en Malpais, Durango, México. AGROPRUDUCTIVIDAD 10(5):3-9. http://www.colpos.mx/wb_pdf/Agroproductividad/2017/AGROPRODUCTIVIDAD_V_2017.pdf

  28. RUTH JM. 2017. Life history attributes of Arizona Grasshopper Sparrow (Ammodramus savannarum ammolegus) and comparisons with other North American subspecies. American Midland Naturalist 178:64-81. https://doi.org/10.1674/0003-0031-178.1.64

  29. RZEDOWSKI J. 1981. Vegetación de México. Editorial LIMUSA. México. 505 p. http://www.biodiversidad.gob.mx/publicaciones/librosDig/pdf/VegetacionMx_Cont.pdf

  30. SAUER JR, Hines JE, Fallon JE, Pardieck KL, Ziolkowski DJ Jr, Link WA. 2017. The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2017. Version 01.30.2015, Laurel, MD. Consulta: 18 de diciembre de 2017. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center

  31. SPANHOVE T, Vanden-Borre J, Delalieux S, Haest B, Paelinckx D. 2012. Can remote sensing estímate scale-fine quality indicators of natural hábitats?. Ecological Indicators 18(2012):403-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.01.025

  32. STIRNEMANN I, Mortelli A, Gibbons P, Lindenmayer D. 2015. Fine-Scale Habitat Heterogeneity Influences Occupancy in Terrestrial Mammals in a Temperate Region of Australia. PLoS One 10(9) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138681

  33. SUTHERLAND W, Newton I, Green R. 2004. Bird Ecology and Conservation: A handbook of techniques. Oxford University Press. New York, U.S.A. ISBN-10: 0198520867

  34. TOMMERVIK H, Karlsen SR, Nilsen L, Johansen B, Storvold R, Zmarz A,Beck P,Johansen K,Hogda K,Goetz S, Park T,Zagajewski B, Myneni R, Bjerke J. 2014. Use of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) in a multi-scale vegetation index study of arctic plant communities in Adventdalen on Svalbard. EARSeL eProceedings. 2014; 13(S1): 47-52. http://www.eproceedings.org/static/vol13_S1/13_S1_tommervik1.pdf

  35. VIERLING K, Vierling L, Gould W, Martinuzzi S, Clawges R. 2008. LIDAR: shedding new light on habitat characterization and modelling. Fron. Ecol. Environ. 6(2):90-98. DOI: 10.1890/070001

  36. VICKERY PD, Tubaro P, Da Silva JMC, Peterjohn BC, Herkert JR, Cavalcanti RB. 1999. Conservation of grasslands birds in the western hemisphere. Studies in Avian Biology; 19: 2-26. ISBN 1-891276-11-5. https://sora.unm.edu/sites/default/files/journals/sab/sab_019.pdf

  37. WIENS, JA. 1969. An approach to the study of ecological relationships among grassland birds. Ornithological Monographs 8:1–93.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

AbanicoVet. 2018;8