Rangel COM, Luna LCA, Téllez GA, Ley FMT

Language: Spanish
References: 28
Page: 269-272
PDF size: 176.87 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Over the years, different thematic concepts attributed to the endodontics are modified. One such step is the sealing of the root canal system, this procedure extremely thorough and critical in obtaining a successful result, it has had in recent years important contributions in terms of new materials and techniques in the field of endodontic. This literature review basic aspects resumed by the latest knowledge about endodontic filling, allow the practitioner endodontics, emphasizing aspects of the last operative stage of root canal, aiming to have alternatives that allow them information update their knowledge on the area of endodontics.

REFERENCES

1. Leonardo MR, Leonardo RT. Endodoncia: conceptos biológicos y recursos tecnológicos. São Paulo: Editorial Artes Médicas; 2009. pp. 91-95.

2. Grossman LI, Oliet S, Del Rio C. En: Grossman LI (ed.). Endodontics. 11a ed. Filadelfia: Lea and Febiger; 1988. p. 279.

3. Canalda C, Braun E. Endodoncia técnicas clínicas y bases científicas. Barcelona: Editorial Masson; 2001.

4. Lee KW, Williams MC, Camps JJ, Pashley DH. Adhesion of endodontic sealers to dentin and gutta-percha. J Endod. 2002; 28 (10): 684-688.

5. Leonardo RT, Consolaro A, Carlos IZ, Leonardo MR. Evaluation of cell culture cytotoxicity of five root canal sealers. J Endod. 2000; 26 (6): 328-330.

6. Grossman LI. Physical properties of root canal cements. J Endod. 1976; 2 (6): 166-175.

7. Ingle J, Beveridge E, Glick D, Weichman J. The Washington study. En: Ingle J, Backland L. Endodoncia. 4a Ed. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 1996. p. 25.

8. Bal AS, Hicks ML, Barnett F. Comparison of laterally condensed .06 and .02 tapered Gutta-Percha and sealer in vitro. J Endod. 2001; 27 (12): 786-788.

9. Vizgirda PJ, Liewehr FR, Patton WR, McPherson JC, Buxton TB. A comparison of laterally condensed gutta-percha, thermoplasticized gutta-percha, and mineral trioxide aggregate as root canal filling materials. J Endod. 2004; 30 (2): 103-106.

10. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Macri E. Evaluation of the apical seal in root canals prepared with a new rotary system and obturated with a methacrylate based endodontic sealer: an in vitro study. J Endod. 2005; 31 (5): 392-395.

11. Hernández-Vigueras S, Piñeiro-Miranda S, Aracena-Rojas S, Alcántara-Dufeu R. Comparación de la calidad de la obturación radicular obtenida con el sistema fluido de obturación radicular v/s técnica de compactación lateral. Av Odontoestomatol. 2008; 24 (4): 255-260.

12. Inan U, Aydin C, Tunca YM, Basak F. In vitro evaluation of matched-taper single-cone obturation with a fluid filtration method. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009; 75 (2): 123.

13. Dadresanfar B, Khalilak Z, Shiekholeslami M, Afshar S. Comparative study of the sealing ability of the lateral condensation technique and the BeeFill system after canal preparation by the Mtwo NiTi rotary system. J Oral Sci. 2010; 52 (2): 281-285.

14. Mahera F, Economides N, Gogos C, Beltes P. Fluid-transport evaluation of lateral condensation, ProTaper gutta-percha and warm vertical condensation obturation techniques. Aust Endod J. 2009; 35 (3): 169-173.

15. Bidar M, Sadeghi G, Gharechahi M, Mortazavi M, Forghani M. In vitro comparison of apical leakage in root canals obturated with 0.04 and 0.02 tapered gutta-percha. Iran Endod J. 2010; 5 (3): 97-100.

16. Koçak MM, Darendeliler-Yaman S. Sealing ability of lateral compaction and tapered single cone gutta-percha techniques in root canals prepared with stainless steel and rotary nickel titanium instruments. J Clin Exp Dent. 2012; 4 (3): e156-e159.

17. Anantula K, Ganta AK. Evaluation and comparison of sealing ability of three different obturation techniques - Lateral condensation, Obtura II, and GuttaFlow: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14 (1): 57-61.

18. Saatchi M, Barekatain B, Behzadian M. Comparing the apical microleakage of lateral condensation and chloroform dip techniques with a new obturation method. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2011; 8 (1): 22-27.

19. Naseri M, Kangarlou A, Khavid A, Goodini M. Evaluation of the quality of four root canal obturation techniques using micro-computed tomography. Iran Endod J. 2013; 8 (3): 89-93.

20. Rodrigues A, Bonetti-Filho I, Faria G, Andolfatto C, Camargo Vilella Berbert FL, Kuga MC. Percentage of gutta-percha in mesial canals of mandibular molars obturated by lateral compaction or single cone techniques. Microsc Res Tech. 2012; 75 (9): 1229-1232.

21. Monticelli F, Sword J, Martin RL, Schuster GS, Weller RN, Ferrari M et al. Sealing properties of two contemporary single-cone obturation systems. Int Endod J. 2007; 40 (5): 374-385.

22. De-Deus G, Coutinho-Filho T, Reis C, Murad C, Paciornik S. Polymicrobial leakage of four root canal sealers at two different thicknesses. J Endod. 2006; 32 (10): 998-1001.

23. Eldeniz AU, Ørstavik D. A laboratory assessment of coronal bacterial leakage in root canals filled with new and conventional sealers. Int Endod J. 2009; 42 (4): 303-312.

24. Savariz A, González-Rodríguez MP, Ferrer-Luque CM. Long-term sealing ability of GuttaFlow versus Ah Plus using different obturation techniques. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010; 15 (6): e936-e941.

25. El Sayed MA, Taleb AA, Balbahaith MS. Sealing ability of three single-cone obturation systems: An in-vitro glucose leakage study. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16 (6): 489-493.

26. Farea M, Masudi S, Wan Bakar WZ. Apical microleakage evaluation of system B compared with cold lateral technique: in vitro study. Aust Endod J. 2010; 36 (2): 48-53.

27. de Almeida-Gomes F, Maniglia-Ferreira C, de Morais-Vitoriano M, Carvalho-Sousa B, Guimaraes NL, dos Santos RA et al. Ex vivo evaluation of coronal and apical microbial leakage of root canal--filled with gutta-percha or Resilon/Epiphany root canal filling material. Indian J Dent Res. 2010; 21 (1): 98-103.

28. Nica LM, Didilescu A, Rusu D, Bacila A, Stratul SI. Photomicrographic evaluation of the apical sealing capacity of three types of gutta-percha master cones: an in vitro study. Odontology. 2012; 100 (1): 54-60.