Yoseff BJJ, Salguero VMA, Delabra RBÁ, Soriano CM

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 1526-1547
PDF size: 189.63 Kb.

ABSTRACT

The objective of this work is to analyze paternal absences and emotions in family life. It is important to identify the emotional discourses generated by parental absences to understand the social and personal significance of these absences. This derives from the findings of the project PAPIIT IN305817 Parenthood: presences and absences, which integrates research data on the different ways in which parents are present or generate absence due to separation, imprisoned men, abandonment or death in different contexts of present-day Mexico. We work from the perspective of sociocultural psychology for the analysis of data. Qualitative research is incorporated as a methodological framework, using as a main strategy the indepth interview with the participants in their dialogical character, constructing and reconstructing the meanings of the father figure as absence or presence in the life of the couple, the children or daughters. Among the main findings is that the semiotic- discursive character points to a highly emotional discourse that is reflected in the narrative and the 'historicized objects' forming part of an emotional universe that is also composed of contradictions: love-hate, re-experience and forgetfulness, sadness and joy.

REFERENCES

1. Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1997). La construcción social de la realidad. Amorortu Editores, Buenos Aires.

2. Donzelot, J. (2008). La Policía de las Familias. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.

3. Dreier, O. (1999). Trayectorias personales de participación a través de contextos de práctica social. En G. Pérez, I. Alarcón, J.J. Yoseff y M. A. Salguero (Comps.). Psicología Cultural, volumen 1. México: UNAM/FES Iztacala.

4. Dreier, O. (2017). Conducción de la Vida Cotidiana. Implicaciones para la Psicología Crítica. Revista Digital Internacional de Psicología y Ciencia Social, 3 (1), 93-108.

5. Flick, U. (2007). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

6. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

7. Goffman, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review, 48 (1), 1-17.

8. González-Rey, F. (2016). Vygotsky’s Concept of Perezhivanie in The Psychology of Art and at the Final Moment of His Work: Advancing His Legacy. Mind, Culture and Activity, 23 (4), 305-314.

9. Halbwachs, M. (2004). La Memoria Colectiva. España: Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza.

10. Heidegger, M. (2016). Ser y tiempo. Chile: Editorial Universitaria.

11. Hochschild, A., R. (1990) Ideology and Emotion Management: A Perspective and Path for Future Research. En: Kemper, Theodore, D. (Ed.) Research Agenda in the Sociology of Emotions. State University of New York Press, Nueva York, pp. 117-142.

12. Kvale, S. (2011). Las entrevistas en investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.

13. Lara-Quinteros, R. A. y Avendaño, Ma. F. (2015). Vínculo Padre-Hijo: Un Análisis desde el Itinerario Biográfico de Varones Jóvenes no Heterosexuales. Ponencia presentada en el V Coloquio Internacional de Estudios de Varones y Masculinidades. 14-16 enero 2015, Santiago de Chile.

14. Mok, N. (2016). Commentary: Understanding and using perezhivanie and subjectivity. International Research in Early Childhood Education 7 (1), 238-246.

15. Mok, N. (2017). On the Concept of Perezhivanie: A Quest for a Critical Review. En M. Fleer, F. González-Rey y N. Veresov (Eds.), Perezhivanie, Emotions and Subjectivity, Perspectives in Cultural-Historical Research (pp. 19- 45). London: Springer.