medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Electrónica de Psicología Iztacala

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Elec Psic Izt 2018; 21 (4)

An introduction to reflective supervision

Zamora I, Ortiz A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1611-1622
PDF size: 157.91 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

ABSTRACT

This article provides an overview of the basics of reflective supervision. Reflective supervision is an important component of the training of professionals in the area of infant mental health. This supervision style focuses on the collaboration between the supervisor and student as the vehicle to analyze the student’s work. This article illustrates the principles of reflective supervision by using two sample cases. These two cases were created based on the most common issues that arise in our clinics at University of Southern California University Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities (USC UCEDD) at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.


REFERENCES

  1. Atkins, S., y Murphy, K. (1993). Reflection: A review of the literature. Journal of advanced nursing, 18(8), 1188-1192.

  2. Brunori, L., Magnani, G., y Raggi, C. (2007). Special section: Supervision between rituals: Creativity and the development of the reflective function. Group Analysis, 40(2), 216-235.

  3. Emde, R. N. (2009). Facilitating reflective supervision in an early child development center. Infant Mental Health Journal, 30, 664-672. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20235

  4. Gilkerson, L. (2004). Irving B. Harris distinguished lecture: Reflective supervision in infant–family programs: Adding clinical process to nonclinical settings. Infant Mental Health Journal, 25(5), 424-439.

  5. Heffron, M. C., y Murch, T. (2010). Reflective supervision and leadership in infant and early childhood programs. Washington, DC: Zero To Three.

  6. Leisman, G., Mualem, R., y Mughrabi, S. K. (2015). El desarrollo neurológico del niño con el enriquecimiento educativo en mente. Psicología Educativa, 21, 79-96.

  7. McLean, B., y Whalley, J. (2004). No real tale has a beginning or an end… Exploring the relationship between co‐supervision, reflective dialogue and psychotherapeutic work with mental health service users. Reflective Practice, 5(2), 225-238.

  8. Mulas, F., y Millá, M. (2002). La atención temprana. Qué es y para qué sirve. Summa Neurológica, 1, 31-5.

  9. Neufeldt, S. A., Karno, M. P., y Nelson, M. L. (1996). A qualitative study of experts' conceptualizations of supervisee reflectivity. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 43(1), 3.

  10. O’Rourke, P. (2011). The significance of reflective supervision for infant mental health work. Infant Mental Health Journal, 32, 165-173. doi: 10.1002/imhj.20290

  11. Osmond, J., y Darlington, Y. (2005). Reflective analysis: Techniques for facilitating reflection. Australian Social Work, 58(1), 3-14.

  12. Parlakian, R., y Seibel, N. L. (2002). Building strong foundations: Practical guidance for promoting the social-emotional development of infants and toddlers. Washington, DC: Zero To Three.

  13. Proctor, B. (1992). On being a trainer and supervision for counselling in action. Supervision in the Helping Professions. Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

  14. Rauktis, M. E., y Thomas, T. L. (2013). Reflective practices in supervision: Why thinking and reflecting are as important as doing. In Contemporary issues in child welfare practice (pp. 235-256). New York, NY: Springer.

  15. Tomlin, A. M., Weatherston, D. J., y Pavkov, T. (2014). Critical components of reflective supervision: Responses from expert supervisors in the field. Infant Mental Health Journal, 35(1),70-80.

  16. Weigand, R. F. (2007). Reflective Supervision in Child Care. Zero to Three, 28(2), 17-22.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Elec Psic Izt. 2018;21