medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Annals of Hepatology

Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

Next >>

Ann Hepatol 2019; 18 (1)

The Painstaking Job of Making Editorial Decisions for Biomedical Journals

Panduro A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 1
Page: 5
PDF size: 96.24 Kb.


Key words:

No keywords

Text Extraction

As a biomedical journal, one of the biggest challenges for the Editorial Board of Annals of Hepatology is to reduce the review time of the contributor’s manuscript after submission, as well as the production process time between acceptance and final publication. Our peer-review process includes a first decision of the manuscript by the editorial committee (editor-in-chief and co-editors) assigning reviewers if considered suitable for publication and monitoring the peer-reviewer-author communication until the paper is accepted or rejected. The second stage corresponds to the publishing process to include the article in the nearest upcoming issue of the journal.


REFERENCES

  1. Garmel GM. Reviewing manuscripts for biomedical journals. Perm J 2010; 14: 32-40.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Ann Hepatol. 2019;18