medigraphic.com

2006, Number S2

<< Back Next >>

Arch Cardiol Mex 2006; 76 (S2)

Stentless bioprostheses they are better?

Juárez HA, Sánchez PTE

Language: Spanish
References: 20
Page: 107-111
PDF size: 107.64 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The history and evolution of the bioprostheses is revised, above all the stentless. According to the international literature these were the first prosthesis that were established to cardiac level with very good results in the haemodynamic aspect, but that to lack an adequate preparation to diminish its antigenicity, to enlarge its resistance and to avoid the deterioration by calcification, less lasting than the mechanics did them. Nevertheless, it given that the real valvular area is much better than in all the other prostheses, their magnificent haemodynamic performance, the not mandatory use of anticoagulants, they do it a good offering for the patients with valvulopathy, above all the aortic. That international experience, now also shows how the use of anticalcification has improved even more the performance of these prostheses, to enlarge considerably its useful time of long-term life, reasons these by that are being utilized in form increasingly more extensive, above all indicating its use in patients more young, which before was almost prohibitive. Finally the initial experience with these bioprotheses in the National Institute of Cardiology of México is mentioned.


REFERENCES

  1. MURRAY G: Homologous aortic valve segments transplants as surgical treatment for aortic and mitral insufficiency. Angiology 1956: 466-471.

  2. DURAN CG, GUNNNING AJ: A method for placing a total homologous aortic valve in the subcoronary position. Lancet 1962; 2: 488-489.

  3. BARRAT-BOYES BG: Homograft aortic valve replacement and aortic incompetence and stenosis. Thorax 1964; 19: 131-150.

  4. ANGELL WW, IBSEN AB, STENSON EB, SHUMWAY ME: Fresh aortic homografts for multiple valve replacement. J Thorac Surg 1968; 56: 323-328.

  5. SENNING A: Fascia lata replacement of aortic valves. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1967; 54: 465-470.

  6. IONESCU MI, PABRASKY BC, HOLDEN MP, MARY DA, WOOLER GH: Results of aortic valve replacement with frame supported fascia lata and pericardial grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1972; 64: 340-353.

  7. BINET JP, DURAN CG, CARPENTIER A, LANGLOIS J: Heterologous aortic valve transplantation. Lancet 1965; 2:1275-1279.

  8. ROSS DN: Replacement of aortic and mitral valve with a pulmonary autograft. Lancet 1967; 4: 959-1004.

  9. CARPENTIER A, BLONDEAU P, LAURENS P, MANCEL P, LAURENT D, DUBOST C: Replacement des valvules mitrales et tricuspides par des hètèrogreffes. Am Chir Thorac Cardiovasc 1966; 7: 33-36.

  10. CARPENTIER A, DELOCHE A, RELLAND J, FABIANI J, DUBOST C, ET AL: Six year follow up of glutaraldehide-preserved heterografts with particular reference to the treatment of congenital malformations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1974; 68: 771-782.

  11. GONZÁLEZ-LAVIN L, ROSS DN: Homograft aortic valve replacement. A five year experience at the National Hospital, London. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1970; 60: 1-8.

  12. NEETHLING WM, HODGE AJ, GLANCY R: Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior. J Card Surg. 2005 Jan-feb; 20(1): 29-34.

  13. CARPENTIER SM, CARPENTIER AF, CHEN L, SHEN M, QUINTERO LJ, WITZEL TH: Calcium mitigation in bioprosthetic tissues by iron pretreatment: the challenge of iron leaching. Ann Thorac Sur. 1977 may; 63(5): 1514-1550.

  14. OGLE MF, KELLY SJ, BIANCO RW, LEVY RJ: Calcification resistance with aluminium-ethanol treated porcine valve bioprostheses in juvenile sheep. Ann Thorac Surg apr; 75(4): 1267-73.

  15. JORGE-HERRERO E, FERNANDEZ P, DE LA TORRE N, ESCUDERO C, ET AL: Inhibition of the calcification of porcine valve tissue by selective lipid removal. Biomaterials. 1994 aug; 15(10): 815-20.

  16. CHANDA J: Prevention of heart valve bioprostheses: an experimental study in rat. Ann Thorac S Durg 1995 aug; 60(2 suppl); s339-42.

  17. GRUBITZSCH H, LINNEWEBER J, KOSSAGK C, SANLI E, BEHOLZ S, ET AL: Aortic valve replacement with new-generation stentless pericardial valves: shortterm clinical and hemodynamic result. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005; 14: 623-629.

  18. MATSUE H, SAWA Y, MATSUMIYA G, MATSUDA H, HAMADA S: Mid-term results of Freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005; 14: 630-636

  19. MYKEN PS: Seventeen year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005; 14: 486-489.

  20. BOTTIO T, RIZZOLI G, CAPRILI L, TESTOLIN L, THIENE G, ET AL: Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity matched population. The Journal of Heart Valve Disease 2005; 14: 493-500.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com