medigraphic.com
ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2019; 76 (1)

Minimally invasive esthetic dentistry

Karakowsky KL, Fierro VA

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 30-37
PDF size: 545.13 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Minimally invasive dentistry has become the standard of care most widely accepted today. This trend has been posible in great extent to the advent of new dental materials that adhere to dental structure, more conservative techniques of healthy dental tissue but mainly from clinicians and patients with a new way of thinking. Contemporary esthetic dentistry has been influenced by this new paradigm. Treatment of dental stainings has also been influenced by this new trend and new materials have recently surfaced that keep healthy dental tissue without the need of non conservative preparations. The most important aspect in order to incorporate this new technologies is a correct diagnosis understanding the cause that originated this condition in order to implement the best posible treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Pérez F. Estilos de personalidad y su influencia en la decisión de someterse a blanqueamiento dental. Universidad de Chile; 2015.

  2. Tin-Oo MM, Saddki N, Hassan N. Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics. BMC Oral Health. 2011 Feb 23; 11: 6.

  3. Afroz S, Rathi S, Rajput G, Rahman S. Dental esthetics and its impact on psycho-social well-being and dental self confidence: a campus based survey of north Indian University Students. The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2003; 13 (4): 455-460.

  4. Akarslan Z, Sadik B, Erten H, Karabulut E. Dental esthetic satisfaction, received and desired dental treatments for improvement of esthetics. Indian J Dent Res. 2009; 20 (2): 195.

  5. Soto-Rojas AE. A review of the prevalence of dental fluorosis in Mexico. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2004; 15 (1): 9-17.

  6. Casas L Apayco; Baseggio W; Batista E, Lia Mondelli R. Tratamiento de la pigmentación sistémica en el consultorio asociado a microabrasión de esmalte. 2010; 48 (2).

  7. Hidalgo-Gato I, Duque de Estrada JR, Mayor F, Zamora Díaz J. Fluorosis dental: no solo un problema estético. Rev Cubana Estomatol. 2007; 44 (4).

  8. Cuenca E. Odontología preventiva y comunitaria. Vol. 4. Barcelona: Elsevier Masson; 2013.

  9. Bordoni N, Escobar Rojas A, Mercado Castillo R. Odontología Pediátrica. La salud bucal del niño y el adolescente en el mundo actual. Buenos Aires: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2010.

  10. Balan B, Madanda Uthaiah C, Narayanan S, Mookalamada Monnappa P. Microabrasion: an effective method for improvement of esthetics in dentistry. Case Rep Dent. 2013: 951589.

  11. Sánchez Hinojosa Gerardo, Molina Frechero Nelly, Irigoyen Camacho María Esther. Prevalencia y severidad de fluorosis dental aplicando el índice Thylstrup y Fejerskov (TF). Tem Selec Invest Clín. 1996; II (2): 47-58.

  12. Netera G, Alfredo E, Pereza-Urrutia I, Uzcategui-Giannattasio GM. Microabrasión del esmalte técnica para la remoción de manchas dentales. Acta Odontológica, Venezolana. 2005; 43 (3): 318-322.

  13. Silva SM, Lanza CR, de Oliveira FS, Machado MA. Tratamiento de hipoplasia del esmalte con la técnica de microabrasión en odontopediatría en odontología. Rev Odontológica Dominicana. 1999; 5 (1): 9-14.

  14. Calixto LR, Galafassi G, Alves MR, Mandarino F. Tratamento de manchas dentais: Clareamento e Microabrasão. CADERNO CIENTÍFICO, Estética. 2007; 20-22.

  15. Croll TP, Cavanaugh R. Enamel color modification by controlled hydrochloric acid and pumice abrasion. Quintessence Int. 1986; 7 (2): 26-28.

  16. Becerra VE, Gómez EA, Soler SL, Sampaio JM. Microabrasión del esmalte para el tratamiento de remoción de defectos superficiales. DENTUM. 2005; 5 (1): 12-15.

  17. Mendes RF, Mondelli J, De Freitas CA. Avaliacao da quantidade de desgaste do esmalte dentario sibmetido a microabrasao. Rev FOB. 1999; 7 (1/2): 35-40.

  18. Meirles S, Darci A, Ferdinand L, Jorge B, Flavio D. Surface roughness and enamel loss with two microabrasion techniques. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2009; 10: 1-10.

  19. Croll TP. Enamel microabrasion: the technique. Quintessence int. 1989; 20: 395-400.

  20. Mathias J, Kavitha S, Mahalaxmi S. A comparison of surface roughness after microabrasion of enamel with and without using CPP-ACP an in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2009; 12 (1): 22-25.

  21. Prevost AP, de Grandmont P, Charland R. Enamel microabrasión. J Dent Que. 1991; 28: 377-379.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com