Campos VN, Rivas EE, Hernández GS, Rodríguez NL, Castillo DE, Andrade RH

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page:
PDF size: 1133.60 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Objective: To assess the effects of cardiovascular rehabilitation on quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention in the province of Manabí, Ecuador in the period May 2015 -December 2017.
Method: In 12 months, 122 patients with heart disease of all genders without age limit were evaluated who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent implantation and who did not present with indications to incorporate them into the cardiovascular rehabilitation program. Cardiovascular rehabilitation consisted of physical exercises supervised 21 days after the coronary intervention and stayed in the program for 56 weeks. Quality of life was determined through the SF-36 test, which was measured in three moments, at the beginning, at six (6) and the year, in the same way, the time of reinsertion to work and social activities was quantified.
Results: The quality of life of the patients presented significant differences in the scores of the scales physical function, physical role, emotional role, vitality, emotional well-being, social function, corporal pain, general health and total scale, the values of said scales were they increased after six months and a year of cardiovascular rehabilitation with respect to the initial condition of the patients, which evidenced an improvement in their quality of life; The labor and social reinsertion was 100%, which was gradually according to the characteristics of the patients.
Conclusions: Cardiovascular rehabilitation had a positive effect on the quality of life of the patients, showing to be safe and effective because it achieved 100% of the labor and social reinsertion.

REFERENCES

1. Rogers KA, Karnovsky MJ. A rapid method for the detection of early stages of atherosclerotic lesion formation. The American journal of pathology. 1988; 133(3): p. 451-455.

2. Libby P. Braunwald's heart disease : a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Octava edición ed. Libby P, editor. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008.

3. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Rehabilitation of patients with cardiovascular diseases; report on a seminar convened by the Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization: Copenhagen, Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization; 1969.

4. Piepoli MF, Corrá U, Benzer W, Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Dendale P, Gaita D, et al. Secondary prevention through cardiac rehabilitation: from knowledge to implementation. A position paper from the Cardiac Rehabilitation Section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. 2010; 17(1): p. 1-17.

5. Smith SC, Benjamin EJ, Bonow RO, Braun LT, Creager MA, Franklin BA, et al. AHA/ACCF Secondary Prevention and Risk Reduction Therapy for Patients with Coronary and other Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease: 2011 update: a guideline from the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology Foundation. Circulation. 2011; 124(22): p. 2458-2473.

6. Rivas Estany E, Campos Vera N. ¿Cómo influye la rehabilitación cardíaca después de la cirugía coronaria y la angioplastia? Revista Cubana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. 2018; 24(3): p. 290-296.

7. Pérez Leal I. Índice de reinserción laboral tras un programa de rehabilitación cardiaca. SCIELO. 2014; 60(235): p. 370-378.

8. Vargas Toloza E, Ordoñez Pabó E, Montalvo Mirand O, Díaz Torre L. Calidad de vida relacionada con la salud de los pacientes postinfarto de miocardio. Revista Ciencia y Cuidado. 2007; 5(1): p. 40-50.

9. Lavie CJ, Milani RV. Prevalence of anxiety in coronary patients with improvement following cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training. The American journal of cardiology. 2004; 93(3): p. 336-339.

10. Dempster M, Donnelly M. Measuring the health related quality of life of people with ischaemic heart disease. Heart. 2000; 83(6): p. 641-644.

11. Brown K. A review to examine the use of SF-36 in cardiac rehabilitation. British journal of nursing. 2003; 12(15): p. 904-909.

12. Abreu A. Calidad de vida en los pacientes post infarto de miocardio. Diferencia según la edad. Revista Tempus Vitalis. 2003; 3(2).

13. Pacci-Salazar K, De la Cruz-Fuentes C, Alzamora-Cárdenas A, Nureña-Noriega L, Olórtegui Yzú A, Fernández Coronado R. Impacto de la rehabilitación cardiaca en la calidad de vida de los pacientes del Instituto Nacional Cardiovascular del Perú. Revista Peruana de Epidemiología. 2011; 15(2): p. 126-129.

14. Morata-Crespo AB, Domínguez-Aragó A. Calidad de vida tras un programa de rehabilitación cardíaca. REHABILITACIÓN. 2007; 41(5): p. 197-246.

15. Atehortúa DS, Gallo JA, Rico M, Durango. Efecto de un programa de rehabilitación cardiaca basado en ejercicio sobre la capacidad física, la función cardiaca y la calidad de vida, en pacientes con falla cardiaca. Revista Colombiana de Cardiología. 2011; 8(1): p. 25-36.

16. Ware JE, Smow Kk, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 Health Sruvey: Manual and interpretacion guide. Boston: New England Medical Center Jurnal; 1993.

17. Hernández García S, Mustelier Oquendo JA, Larrinaga Sandrino V, Rodríguez Nande L, Sorio Valdés B, Peña Bofill V, et al. Efecto del entrenamiento físico en pacientes con insuficiencia cardiaca crónica y fracción de eyección del ventrículo izquierdo deprimida. Revista Cubana de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular. 2018; 24(3).