medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2902 (Electronic)

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Revista Cubana de Educación Médica Superior 2018; 32 (2)

Current radiological clinical meeting contribution amid constructivist educational process

Aguirre FRE, Serra VMÁ, Aguirre PRE, Ojeda CAO, Aguirre PME, Paladines FF

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-11
PDF size: 90.67 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The radiological clinical meeting is an academic activity influenced and developed the techniques of communication and information, as well as the advent of new imaging resources, so that its structure as a care and teaching function needs a new model of action that improves its usefulness Assistance, teaching and research through the incorporation of new information and communication technologies. A review of the clinical and radiological practices reported in the last ten years in the ERIC (Educational Resources Information Center), Google scholar, Dialnet, Redalyc and Educateca sites was carried out through the keywords: radiology service in hospital, education, education Based on skills, and media. Pedagogical elements are established to create a model that involves the new communication technologies, interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary, where the students as the center of the educational process develop the processes of knowledge production and professional learning. The proposed structured model allows its applicability in universities and university hospitals for the realization of radiological clinics through a constructivist process, using the new information and communication technologies with integrative foundations in medical teaching.


REFERENCES

  1. Vega Bolívar A. Intervencionismo diagnóstico en patología de mama. Radiología. 2011; 53(6):531-543.

  2. Rotem E, Jen S, Chi A, Dunlap R. Impact of interventional radiology interest group meetings on medical student interest in interventional radiology as a specialty. Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology. 2016; 27(3):S213.

  3. Shaikh M, Shaygi B, Asadi H, Thanaratnam P, Pennycooke K, Mirza M et al. The Introduction of an Undergraduate Interventional Radiology (IR) Curriculum: Impact on Medical Student Knowledge and Interest in IR. CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology. 2015; 39(4):514-521.

  4. Trace A, Ortiz D, Deal A, Retrouvey M, Elzie C, Goodmurphy C et al. Radiology's Emerging Role in 3-D Printing Applications in Health Care. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016; 13(7):856-862.e4.

  5. Okamoto T. The knowledge circulated-organizational management for accomplishing e learning.Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal. 2009;1(1):1-17

  6. Fernández Sacasas JÁ. El principio rector de la Educación Médica cubana. Educación Médica Superior [revista en Internet]. 2013 [citado 2016 Ago 28]; 27(2):[aprox. 0 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.ems.sld.cu/index.php/ems/article/view/170

  7. Murphy K, Crush L, O'Malley E, Daly F, Twomey M, O'Tuathaigh C et al. Medical student perceptions of radiology use in anatomy teaching. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2014;8(6):510-517.

  8. Linaker K. Shades of Grey: An Exploration of the Student Learning Experience in Diagnostic Imaging Education. ProQuest LLC [Internet]. 2012 [cited 28 August 2016]; Available from: http://eric.ed.gov/?q=actual+radiology+teaching+methods&id=ED549197

  9. Halliday N, O'Donoghue D, Klump K, Thompson B. Human structure in six and onehalf weeks: One approach to providing foundational anatomical competency in an era of compressed medical school anatomy curricula. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2014; 8(2):149-157.

  10. Murakami T, Tajika Y, Ueno H, Awata S, Hirasawa S, Sugimoto M et al. An integrated teaching method of gross anatomy and computed tomography radiology. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2014;7(6):438-449.

  11. Webb AChoi S. Interactive radiological anatomy eLearning solution for first year medical students: Development, integration, and impact on learning. Anatomical Sciences Education. 2013;7(5):350-360.

  12. Campos S. What's stopping them? A study of teachers' use of formative feedback with students learning in the clinical setting. DAI-A 74/07(E), Dissertation Abstracts International. Capella University. Ann Arbor, United States. Dissertation/Thesis.2013. Available from: http://search.proquest.com/docview/1328402266 .

  13. Passey, Don, and Brian Samways, eds. Information Technology: supporting change through teacher education. Springer, 2016.

  14. Yildiz MPalak D. Cultivating Global Competencies for the 21st Century Classroom:. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development. 2016;8(1):69-77.

  15. Liebowitz JFrank M. Knowledge management and e-learning. Boca Raton, FL: Auerbach Publications; 2011.

  16. Khawaja RDA, Nadeem N, Beg M. Focus on radiology medical education: teaching preferences among radiologists and residents in private and public radiology departments in Pakistan. 2016. Pjr;21(1):598-609.

  17. Morton CE, Saleh SN, Smith SF, Hemani A, Ameen A, Bennie TD, Toro-Troconis M. Blended learning: how can we optimise undergraduate student engagement?. BMC Medical Education 2016;16(1):195.

  18. Anvari E, Rooney T, Awan O. Challenges and Insights of a Global Radiology Elective in Ecuador. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2016;13(9):1118-20.

  19. Dilauro M, Thornhill R, Fasih N. How Well Are We Respecting Patient Privacy in Medical Imaging? Lessons Learnt From a Departmental Audit. Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal. 2016. Article in press.

  20. Leung Dixon A. Clinico-radiological meetings: Are they worthwhile?. Clinical Radiology. 1992;46(4):279-280.

  21. Ruhstaller T, Roe H, Thürlimann B, Nicoll J. The multidisciplinary meeting: An indispensable aid to communication between different specialities. European Journal of Cancer. 2006;42(15):2459-2462.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com