medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirujano General

ISSN 2594-1518 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0099 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back

Cir Gen 2019; 41 (1)

Teaching of surgery and responsibility to future generations

Campos A
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page: 63-68
PDF size: 183.86 Kb.


Key words:

Responsibility, surgery, teaching, medical ethics, moral obligations, sociology of medicine.

ABSTRACT

In this paper, the responsibility to future generations of surgeons is discussed. Excuses and justifications are analyzed as alternatives to avoid responsibility, as is the recognition of responsibility according to ethics and the law. The ambiguity of the Official Mexican Standard (in Spanish Norma Oficial Mexicana, NOM) for the organization and functioning of medical residencies and its lack of binding to the enforcement of educative obligations are also discussed. Then, the question of whether we have contractual or utilitarian obligations towards future individuals or, rather, an obligation of retribution is analyzed. A mental experiment is posed, of being operated upon by our worst pupil, and some questions entailed by the consequences of this fact are made. It is concluded that the practice of surgery and its teaching are public goods and that bad quality of teaching is a neglect of due care.


REFERENCES

  1. Hemingway E. The Old Man and the Sea. Nueva York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1952. (V. e.: El viejo y el mar. Ciudad de México, Editores Mexicanos Unidos, 1982)

  2. Berkeley G. A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge, Dublín: Impr. Aaron Rhames, 1710, §§ 22-23. (V.e.: Tratado sobre los principios del conocimiento humano, varias ediciones y fechas.)

  3. Gallois A. Berkeley’s Master Argument. The Philosophical Review. 1974; 83 (1): 55-69. DOI: 10.2307/2183873

  4. Campos A. La vulnerabilidad, una anfisbena. Cir Gen. 2011; 33 (S2): S186-S190.

  5. Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1987, p. 356.

  6. Austin JL. A Plea for Excuses. En: Philosophical Papers (2a. ed.) Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1970, pp. 175-177.

  7. Austin JL. Op. cit. 1970, p. 185.

  8. Hart HLA. The Concept of Law. (2a. ed.) Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1994; 43, pp. 86-87.

  9. Pontara G. Etica e generazioni future. Roma: Editori Laterza, 1995. V.e.: Ética y generaciones futuras. Barcelona: Ariel, 1996.

  10. Salisbury, J. Metalogicon. 1159, III, 4.

  11. Bardwick, JM. Danger in the Comfort Zone: From Boardroom to Mailroom. How to Break the Entitlement Habit That’s Killing American Business. AMACOM, American Management Association, Nueva York, 1995.

  12. Mondolfo R. Heráclito. Textos y problemas de su interpretación. México: Siglo XXI, 1966, fragmento 9, p. 31.

  13. Diels H. Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Berlín, Weidmann Buchhandlung, 1906, vol. 1, fragmento 9, p. 63.

  14. Juvenalis DJ. Satires. (Ramsay GG, ed.) Libro 2, Sátira 6, 346 y 348. En http://data.perseus.org/citations/urn:cts:latinLit:phi1276.phi001.perseus-lat1:2.6

  15. Pontara G. Se cita de la v.e.: Ética y generaciones futuras. Barcelona: Ariel, 1996, p. 180.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Gen. 2019;41