medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Trasplantes

ISSN 2007-6800 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

Next >>

Rev Mex Traspl 2019; 8 (1)

Adherence to immunotherapy kidney transplant recipients in a tertiary care center in Mexico

Cruz-Santiago J, Noriega-Salas L, Robledo-Meléndez A, Bernáldez-Gómez G, García-Ramírez C, Meza-Jiménez G, Rivera-Luna E, Díaz-Franco MC
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 5-13
PDF size: 263.84 Kb.


Key words:

Medical adherence, kidney transplantation, inmunotherapy.

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Kidney transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage renal disease, since it is associated with greater patient survival, a better quality of life. Adequate compliance with immunosuppressive therapy is essential in this type of patient, since non-adherence to treatment is the major risk factor for acute rejection and loss of the graft. With the objective of evaluating the adherence of our kidney transplant recipients at the Hospital de Especialidades Centro Médico Nacional La Raza, we applied a questionnaire, analyzing and evaluating the results. Material and methods: With an exploratory, analytical and transversal design, a sample size was determined at convenience; which included patients undergoing renal transplantation, over 18 years of age, in the period of five months who agreed to participate in the study. The patients were evaluated by means of a questionnaire, elaborated with variables of the transplanted organ, the immunotherapy and the evaluation of the adherence to the treatment. With the results, a multivariate model was created to determine the statistical significance of the variables. Results: In a total of 400 patients, a frequency of non-adherence of 5.49% was found. The factors with statistical significance were the perception that the immunosuppressant medication is harmful, OR = 5.53 (p = 0.002), in addition to the interruption of the secondary medication intake to feeling of sadness, OR = 9.43 (0.001). Conclusions: Lack of adherence is a problem that affects the prognosis of kidney transplantation; since it is associated with a higher incidence of antibody-mediated rejection, it is therefore of vital importance to detect this, since the implementation of the kidney transplant protocol and the search for factors that could favor the appearance of this entity, in the post-transplant immediate, and throughout the follow-up of the kidney transplant carrier.


REFERENCES

  1. Lieber SR, Volk ML. Non-adherence and graft failure in adult liver transplant recipients. Dig Dis Sci. 2013; 58 (3): 824-834.

  2. World Health Organization. Adherence to long term therapies. Switzerland: WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data (Internet). [Consultado 03/11/2018]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/chp/knowledge/publications/adherence_report/en/

  3. Centro Nacional de Trasplantes. Estado actual de receptores, donación y trasplantes en México. 1er Semestre 2017. México: Centro Nacional de Trasplantes (Internet). [Consultado 03/11/2018]. Disponible en: http://www.cenatra.salud.gob.mx/interior/trasplante_estadisticas.html

  4. Tielen M, van Exel J, Laging M et al. Attitudes to medication after kidney transplantation and their association with medication adherence and graft survival: a 2-year follow-up study. J Transplant. 2014; 2014: 675301.

  5. Prendergast MB, Gaston RS. Optimizing medication adherence: an ongoing opportunity to improve outcomes after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 5 (7): 1305-1311

  6. Tong A, Howell M, Wong G et al. The perspectives of kidney transplant recipients on medicine taking: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26 (1): 344-354.

  7. Dew MA, DiMartini AF, De Vito Dabbs A et al. Rates and risk factors for nonadherence to the medical regimen after adult solid organ transplantation. Transplantation. 2007; 83: 858-873.

  8. Pinsky BW, Takemoto SK, Lentine KL, Burroughs TE, Schnitzler MA, Salvalaggio PR. Transplant outcomes and economic costs associated with patient noncompliance to immunosuppression. Am J Transplant. 2009; 9 (7): 2597-2606.

  9. Sellarés J, de Freitas DG, Mengel M et al. Understanding the causes of kidney transplant failure: the dominant role of antibody-mediated rejection and nonadherence. Am J Transplant. 2012; 12 (2): 388-399. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2011.03840.x.

  10. Griva K, Davenport A, Harrison M et al. Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplantation: intent vs. forgetfulness and clinical markers of medication intake. Ann Behav Med. 2012; 44 (1): 85-93.

  11. Butler JA, Roderick P, Mullee M, Mason JC, Peveler RC. Frequency and impact of nonadherence to immunosuppressants after renal transplantation: A systematic review. Transplantation. 2004; 77 (5): 769-776.

  12. Denhaerynck K, Burkhalter F, Schäfer-Keller P, Steiger J, Bock A, De Geest S. Clinical consequences of non adherence to immunosuppressive medication in kidney transplant patients. Transpl Int. 2009; 22 (4): 441-446.

  13. Cukor D, Rosenthal DS, Jindal RM, Brown CD, Kimmel PL. Depression is an important contributor to low medication adherence in hemodialyzed patients and transplant recipients. Kidney Int. 2009; 75 (11): 1223-1229.

  14. Achille MA, Ouellette A, Fournier S et al. Impact of stress, distress and feelings of indebtedness on adherence to immunosuppressants following kidney transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2006; 20 (3): 301-306.

  15. Chisholm MA, Williamson GM, Lance CE, Mulloy LL. Predicting adherence to immunosuppressant therapy: A prospective analysis of the theory of planned behaviour. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2007; 22 (8): 2339-2348.

  16. Clifford S, Barber N, Horne R. Understanding different beliefs held by adherers, unintentional nonadherers, and intentional nonadherers: Application of the necessity-concerns framework. J Psychosom Res. 2008; 64: 41-46.

  17. De Geest S, Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F. Clinical and economic consequences of non-adherence to immunosuppressive drugs. In: Grinyó J ed. International Transplantation Updates. Barcelona, Spain: Permanyer Publications; 2011.

  18. Massey EK, Tielen M, Laging M et al. Discrepancies between beliefs and behavior: a prospective study into immunosuppressive medicadherence after kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2015; 99 (2): 375-380.

  19. Lefaucheur C, Loupy A, Hill GS et al. Preexisting donor-specific HLA antibodies predict outcome in kidney transplantation. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010; 21 (8): 1398-1406.

  20. De Geest S, Burkhalter H, Bogert L et al. Describing the evolution of medication nonadherence from pretransplant until 3 years post-transplant and determining pretransplant medication nonadherence as risk factor for post-transplant nonadherence to immunosuppressives: the Swiss Transplant Cohort. Transpl Int. 2014; 27: 657-666.

  21. Denhaerynck K, Dobbels F, Cleemput I et al. Prevalence, consequences, and determinants of nonadherence in adult renal transplant patients: A literature review. Transpl Int. 2005; 18 (10): 1121-1133.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Traspl. 2019;8