medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Médica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc 2019; 57 (1)

Silent pituitary plurihormonal adenoma: clinical relevance of immunohistochemical analysis

García-Sáenz M, Uribe-Cortés D, González-Virla B, Mendoza-Zubieta V, Vargas-Ortega G
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 17
Page: 48-55
PDF size: 779.20 Kb.


Key words:

Adenoma, Basophil, Adenoma, Acidophil, Immunohistochemistry, Recurrence.

ABSTRACT

Background: Non-functional pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) present low growth rates; however, some are aggressive and invasive. In 2017 the World Health Organization recognized clinically aggressive adenomas as “high-risk pituitary adenomas”. These include the sparsely granulated somatotroph adenoma, the Crooke’s cell adenoma, the silent corticotroph adenoma and the plurihormonal Pit-1-positive adenoma (subtype 3).
Clinical case: 25-year-old woman who presented oligomenorrhea, increased weight, decreased visual acuity and chronic headache. Biochemical and imaging evaluation showed a NFPA. Transsphenoidal surgery was performed with complete resection of lesion, and during short-term follow-up it was observed recurrence, which is why the patient needed two more interventions. The immunohistochemistry reported: ACTH ++ 90%, prolactin ++ 20%, GH ++ 5%, CKAE1-AE3 +++ 90%, Ki-67 10%. The final diagnosis was plurihormonal adenoma, since the immunohistochemical analysis was positive for more than one pituitary hormone and suggested two distinct cell lineages: Pit-1 and Tpit, both recognized as aggressive adenomas.
Conclusions: This case report highlights the significance of a comprehensive immunohistochemical study, which includes transcriptional factors to classify cell lineage, in order to predict aggressiveness and provide personalized treatment.


REFERENCES

  1. Øystese KA, Evang JA, Bollerslev J. Non-functioning pituitary adenomas: growth and aggressiveness. Endocrine. 2016;53(1):28-34. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-016- 0940-7

  2. Cámara-Gómez R. Tumores hipofisarios no funcionantes: actualización 2012. Endocrinol Nutr. 2014;61(3):160-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.endonu.2013.04.009

  3. Castinetti F, Dufour H, Gaillard S, Jouanneau E, Vasiljevic A, Villa C, et al. Non-functioning pituitary adenoma: When and how to operate? What pathologic criteria for typing? Ann Endocrinol. 2015;76(3):220-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ando.2015.04.007

  4. Mayson SE, Snyder PJ. Silent pituitary adenomas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2015;44(1):79-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2014.11.001

  5. Saeger W, Honegger J, Theodoropoulou M, Knappe UJ, Schöfl C, Petersenn S, et al. Clinical Impact of the Current WHO Classification of Pituitary Adenomas. Endocr pathol. 2016;27(2):104-14. DOI: 10.1007/s12022-016-9418-7

  6. Mete O, Lopes MB. Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors. Endocr Pathol. 2017;28(3):228-43. DOI: 10.1007/s12022-017-9498-z

  7. Chiloiro S, Bianchi A, Doglietto F, de Waure C, Giampietro A, Fusco A, et al. Radically resected pituitary adenomas: prognostic role of Ki 67 labeling index in a monocentric retrospective series and literature review. Pituitary. 2014;17(3):267-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-013-0500-6

  8. Mayson SE, Snyder PJ. Silent (clinically nonfunctioning) pituitary adenomas. J Neurooncol. 2014;117(3):429-36. DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1425-2

  9. Cooper O, Melmed S. Subclinical hyperfunctioning pituitary adenomas: the silent tumors. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;26(4):447-60. DOI: 10.1016/j. beem.2012.01.002

  10. Cooper O. Silent corticotroph adenomas. Pituitary. 2015;18(2):225-31. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-014-0624-3

  11. Cazabat L, Dupuy M, Boulin A, Bernier M, Baussart B, Foubert L, et al. Silent, but not unseen: multimicrocystic aspect on T2-weighted MRI in silent corticotroph adenomas. Clin Endocrinol. 2014;81(4):566-72. DOI: 10.1111/cen.12443

  12. Walsh MT, Couldwell WT. Symptomatic Cystic Degeneration of a Clinically Silent Corticotroph Tumor of the Pituitary Gland. Skull Base. 2010;20(5):367-70. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253579

  13. Di Ieva A, Davidson JM, Syro LV, Rotondo F, Montoya JF, Horvath E, et al. Crooke's Cell Tumors of the Pituitary. Neurosurgery. 2015;76(5):616-22. DOI: 10.1227/NEU. 0000000000000657

  14. Park M, Lee SK, Choi J, Kim SH, Kim SH, Shin NY, et al. Differentiation betwen Cystic Pituitary Adenomas and Rathke Cleft Cysts: A Diagnostic Model Using MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(10):1866-73. DOI: 10.3174/ ajnr.A4387

  15. Babu R, Back AG, Komisarow JM, Owens TR, Cummings TJ, Britz GW. Symptomatic Rathke's cleft cyst with a coexisting pituitary tumor; Brief review of the literature. Asian J Neurosurg. 2013;8(4):183-7. DOI: 10.4103/1793- 5482.125662

  16. Guo SY, Cai XQ, Ma J, Wang WY, Lu G. Diagnosis of concomitant pituitary adenoma and Rathke's cleft cyst with magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Surg. 2015;18:191-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.05.001

  17. Moshkin O, Syro LV, Scheithauer BW, Ortiz LD, Fadul CE, Uribe H, et al. Aggressive silent corticotroph adenoma progressing to pituitary carcinoma. The role of temozolamide therapy. Hormones (Athens). 2011;10(2): 162-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2019;57