2019, Number S1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2019; 42 (S1)
Blocking of the adductor channel. Correlation between anatomical understanding and the result
Hernández-Gasca VM
Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 68-69
PDF size: 86.66 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Fichtner T, Moriggl B, Chan V. The optimal analgesic block for total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:711-719.
Yi Wong W, Bjorn S, Christin J, et al. Defining the location of the adductor canal using ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:241-245.
Johnston D, Sondekoppam R, Ganapathy S, et al. Determination of ED 50 y ED 95 of 0.5% ropivacaine in adductor canal block to produce quadriceps weakness. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017;42:731-736.
Burckett D, peng P, Chang V, Perlas A, et al. The nerves of the adductor canal and the innervation of the knee. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:321-327.
Johnston D, Black N, et al. Spread of dye injectate in the distal femoral triangle versus the distal adductor canal: a cadaveric. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:39-45.
Marian A, Ranganath Y, et al. A comparison of two ultrasound guided approaches to the saphenous nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:623-630.
Swenson J, Davis J, et al. The subsartorial plexus block, a variation on the adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015;40:732-733.
Meier A, Auyong D, et al. Comparison of continuous proximal vs distal adductor canal blocks for total knee arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:36-42.
Neal J, Salinas F, et al. Local anesthetic induced myotoxicity after continuous adductor canal block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:723-727.
Full text