2019, Number S1
<< Back Next >>
Rev Mex Anest 2019; 42 (S1)
Mechanical ventilation strategies in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery
Guevara-García H, Gutiérrez-Acar H, Arroyave-Gordillo JA
Language: Spanish
References: 6
Page: 89-90
PDF size: 85.72 Kb.
Text Extraction
No abstract.
REFERENCES
Kadono Y, Yaegashi H, Machioka K, et al. Cardiovascular and respiratory effects of the degree of head-down angle during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Med Robotics Comput Assist Surg. 2013;9:17-22.
The LAS VEGAS investigators. Epidemiology, practice of ventilation and outcome for patients at increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications: LAS VEGAS-an observational study in 29 countries. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:492-507.
Choi EM, Na S, Choi SH, An J, Rha KH, Oh YJ. Comparison of volume-controlled and pressure-controlled ventilation in steep Trendelenburg position for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23:183-188.
Rishabh J, Pooja BJ, Mamta D, et al. Comparison of volume controlled ventilation and pressure controlled ventilation in patients undergoing robot-assisted pelvic surgeries: An open-label trial. Indian J Anaesth. 2017;61: 17-23.
Choi ES, Oh AY, In CB, Ryu JH, Jeon YT, Kim HG. Effects of recruitment manoeuvreon perioperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoingrobotic assisted radical prostatectomy: A randomised single-blinded trial. PLoS ONE. 2007;12:e0183311.
Park M, Ahn HJ, Kim JA, et al. Driving Pressure during Thoracic Surgery A Randomized Clinical Trial. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:385-93.
Full text