medigraphic.com
ISSN 8541-3697 (Print)

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

AbanicoVet 2019; 9 (1)

Comparison of the forage tree species consumption by Pecari tajacu in captivity

Montes-Pérez R, Canul-Torres C, Cumi-Martín J, Castillo-Caamal J

Language: Spanish
References: 16
Page: 1-8
PDF size: 216.45 Kb.


ABSTRACT

The objective was to compare consumption of dry matter (CMS) of Mucuna fruit (M. deeringiana), forages of ramón (B. alicastrum), jabín (P. piscipula), and Moringa (M. oleifera) in Collared Peccary male adults (P. tajacu). The study was carried out in two parts, the first one was executed with Latin square design (DCL) 4x4 with two repetitions, and three forages with ground Mucuna fruit were offered. In the second part, the preferred forage was eliminated in the first test and DCL 3x3 was applied. Variance analysis was used for 4x4 and 3x3 DCL respectively, and Tukey test between means. Linear regression models were adjusted between the CMS and nutrient contents of each forage. The CMS in the first part showed a significant difference between the Moringa forages and the rest of them. In the second test, the CMS presented a significant difference between Ramón and the two remaining forages. Three linear regression models were highly significant, between CMS and crude protein content (PC), neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and total phenols (FT). It is concluded that peccaries have the preference for M. oleifera, which has the highest values in PC, FT and the lowest in NDF.


REFERENCES

  1. AOAC. 2005. Official Method 990.03. Protein (crude) in animal feed, combustion method. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. ISBN: 0935584544 9780935584547. 18th edition. AOAC International, Arlington, VA, USA. pp. 30-31, Chapter 4.

  2. ANKOM Technology a. Sin Año. Acid Detergent Fiber in Feeds - Filter Bag Technique (for A2000 and A2000I) ADF. Method, Method 12. https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_12_ADF_A2000.pdf

  3. ANKOM Technology b. Sin año. Neutral Detergent Fiber in Feeds - Filter Bag Technique (for A2000 and A2000I). https://www.ankom.com/sites/default/files/document-files/Method_13_NDF_A2000.pdf

  4. BORGES-VENTURA DI, Montes-Pérez R, Sarmiento-Franco L, Solorio-Sanchez F. 2014. Efecto de la suplementación de ensilado de pasto Taiwán (Pennisetum purpureum) y ramón (Brosimum alicastrum) sobre el cambio de peso corporal y variables hemáticas del pecarí de collar (Pecari tajacu) en cautiverio. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems. 17 (2):277-279. ISSN: 1870-0462. http://www.redalyc.org/pdf/939/93931761016.pdf

  5. DI-MARCO, O. 2011. Estimación de calidad de los forrajes. Producir XXI 20(240): 24-30. Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal. http://www.produccion-animal.com.ar/tablas_composicion_alimentos/45-calidad.pdf.

  6. GALLEGO-BURBANO EJ, Morales-Velasco S y Vivas-Quilla NJ. 2012. Propuesta para el uso de especies arbóreas y arbustivas forrajeras en sistemas ganaderos en el Valle del Patia. Cauca. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial. Julio-Diciembre 10(2): 207-216. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/bsaa/v10n2/v10n2a24.pdf

  7. GARCIA DE, Medina MG, Cova LJ, Humbría J, Torres A, Moratinos P. 2008. Preferencia caprina por especies forrajeras con amplia distribución en el estado de Trujillo, Venezuela. Archivos de Zootecnia 57: 403-413. ISSN: 0004-0592. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/28317651/download.

  8. MAKKAR HPS, Becker K. 1993. Vanillin-HCl method for condensed tannins: effect of organic solvents used for extraction of tannins. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 19: 613-621. ISSN: 1573-1561. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00984996.

  9. MAKKAR H.P.S. 2003. Measurement of Total Phenolics and Tannins Using Folin-Ciocalteu Method. In: Quantification of Tannins in Tree and Shrub Foliage. Springer, Dordrecht. pp 49-51. ISBN: 978-94-017-0273-7. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-017-0273-7_3.

  10. MÁRQUEZ LD, Suárez LA. 2008. El uso de taninos condensados como alternativa nutricional y sanitaria en rumiantes. Revista de Medicina Veterinaria. 16: 87-109. ISSN: 0122-9354. URL: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/4943803.pdf MICROSOFT Corp. 1990-1995. Statgraphics Plus 5.1. USA.

  11. MONTES-PEREZ RC, Mora-Camacho O. y Mukul-Yerves JM. 2012. Forage intake of the collared peccary (Pecari tajacu). Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias. 25: 586-591. ISSN 0120-0690. http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-06902012000400006.

  12. MONTES-PEREZ RC, Borges-Ventura D., Solorio-Sanchez F., Sarmiento-Franco L., Magaña-Monforte J. 2018. Preferencia del consumo de ensilado y su efecto sobre la actividad ovárica del Pecar tajacu. Abanico Veterinario. 8: 47-58. ISSN: 2448-6132. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/av/v8n2/2448-6132-av-8-02-47-en.pdf

  13. QUIROZ-CARDOSO F, Rojas-Hernández S, Olivares-Pérez J, Hernández-Castro E, Jiménez-Guillén R, Córdova-Izquierdo A, Villa-Mancera A, Abdel-Fattah S. 2015. Composición nutricional, consumo e índices de palatabilidad relativa de los frutos de tres acacias en la alimentación de ovejas y cabras. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 47:33-38. ISSN: 0717-6201. https://scielo.conicyt.cl/pdf/amv/v47n1/art07.pdf

  14. OLIVEIRA EG., Santos ACF, Dias JCT, Rezende RP, Nogueira-Filho SLG and Gross E. 2009. The influence of urea feeding on the bacterial and archaeal community in the forestomach of collared peccary (Artiodactyla, Tayassuidae). Journal of Applied Microbiology. 107:1711-1718. ISSN: 1365-2672. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009. 04357.x

  15. ORELLANA LR, Espadas MC, Nava MF. 2010. Climas. En: Durán R. y M. Méndez (Eds.), Biodiversidad y Desarrollo Humano en Yucatán. Mérida, Yucatán: CICY, PPD-FMAM, CONABIO, SEDUMA. 508p. ISBN: 978-607-7823-05-6.

  16. SOWLS LK. 1997. Javelinas and other peccaries: their biology, management, and use. second edition. College Station: Texas A&M University Press. 325 p. ISBN: 0-89096-717-2.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com