medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Ortopédica Mexicana

ISSN 2992-8036 (Electronic)
ISSN 2306-4102 (Print)
Órgano Oficial del Colegio Mexicano de Ortopedia y Traumatología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2004, Number s1

<< Back Next >>

Acta Ortop Mex 2004; 18 (s1)

Kyphosis after dorsal spine surgery with and without sparing the posterior ligament system

Mota BR, Escalona VR, Illescas LE, Vega CJ
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 9
Page: 19-22
PDF size: 61.56 Kb.


Key words:

spine, kyphosis.

ABSTRACT

Material and methods. A cohort analysis was conducted on 74 patients who underwent instrumentation fusion of the spine with a dorsal approach. Spines were operated regardless of etiology, age or gender of patients. Patients were randomized into 2 groups, 37 to a group. One group had the spine posterior ligament system (PLS) spared. The other group did not. Both were followed up for an average 30 months. The variable at issue was the development of kyphosis on the cephalic end of the instrumentation as an X-ray complication during the postoperative period. Statistical analysis was done by simple frequencies and inferred statistics using Mann-Whitney´s “U” and Fisher’s testing kyphosis and their postoperative grading. Results. The median age of patients was 13.5 years (ranging between 9 and 28 years). Females prevailed by 65%; prevailing etiologies were idiopathic scoliosis (62.2%) and Scheuermann disease (14.8%). The group having their spine posterior ligament system spared had a lower incidence of postoperative kyphosis (p ‹ 0.001) and less loss of correction in kyphosis degrees (p = 0.037). Conclusion. Sparing the spine posterior ligament system in patients under posterior instrumentation showed a lower incidence of postoperative kyphosis of the instrumentation cephalic end compared to patients who had not their ligament system spared.


REFERENCES

  1. Durrani A, Cincinnati OH: Complications of surgical management of Scheuermann kyphosis. AAOS. Annual Meeting 1999; 109.

  2. Bauer R, Kerchnbaumer P: Cirugía Ortopédica, Vías de Abordaje. Ed. Marban, 1998.

  3. Hoppenfield R: Surgical Exposures in Orthopedics. The anatomical Approach. 2nd Edition. USA, Lippincott Company, 1994.

  4. Lee Guy: Proximal kyphosis after posterior spinal fusion in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 1999; 24(8): 795-799.

  5. Lowe TG, Kasten MJ: An analysis of sagital curves and balance after Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for kyphosis secondary to Scheuermann disease. A review of 32 patients. Spine 1994; 19(15): 1680-1685.

  6. Mc Collister E: Surgery of the musculoskeletal system, 2nd Edition, USA, Churchill Livingstone, 1990.

  7. Moe S: Textbook of scoliosis and other spinal deformities, 2nd Edition, USA, Saunders Company, 1987.

  8. Shapiro G: Results of surgical treatment of adult idiopathic scoliosis with low back pain and spinal stenosis: A study of long term clinical and radiographic outcome. AAOS. Annual Meeting, 2002; 83.

  9. Yazar T, Ankara T: A New approach to scoliosis problem. AAOS. Annual Meeting, 2000; 181.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Ortop Mex. 2004 Jul-Dic;18