medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista ADM Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana

ISSN 0001-0944 (Print)
Órgano Oficial de la Asociación Dental Mexicana
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev ADM 2019; 76 (4)

The quad-helix, a versatile appliance

Ornelas RJF, Canto CDB
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 25
Page: 219-228
PDF size: 405.22 Kb.


Key words:

Helix, anterior crossbite, posterior crossbite, oral habits, maxilar expansion, torque.

ABSTRACT

The quad-helix (QH) is a maxillary expansion appliance, manufactured with stainless steel wire welded to bands in molars, which has spirals or helix to increase the length of wire of the device, which makes it very elastic and lightens the magnitude of the force on the teeth, is widely used both in mixed and in early permanent dentition, is easy to manufacture, hygienic and well tolerated by patients. Its major action is to move towards the dentoalveolar process of the maxillary arcade, secondarily influencing the expansion of the middle palatal suture in young patients with mixed or permanent early dentition. The QH is very practical and has many uses and adaptations as an aid in the treatment of problem of thumb sucking or tongue habit, to open bite, to rotate and torque permanent molars or to move only one particular tooth. In this article we describe a new application of the QH that consist of the traction or retained permanent upper teeth, after surgical approach to locate them. We will also review the indications, contraindications, advantages and disadvantages of the QH welded to molar bands, as well as its construction, variants and activation form.


REFERENCES

  1. Godoy F, Godoy-Bezerra J, Rosenblatt A. Treatment of posterior crossbite comparing 2 appliances: A community-based trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2011; 139 (1): 45-52.

  2. Mucedero M, Franchi L, Giuntini V, Vangelisti A, McNamara J, Cozza P. Stability of quad-helix/crib therapy in dentoskeletal open bite: A long-term controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2013; 143 (5): 695-703.

  3. Quiroz-Alvarez OJ. Manual de ortopedia funcional de los maxilares y ortodoncia interceptiva. Caracas: Actualidades Médico Odontológicas Latinoamérca;1994. p. 72.

  4. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ, Schulhof RJ. Técnica bioprogresiva de Ricketts. Madrid: Editorial Médica Panamericana; 2001. p. 178, 246, 247, 249.

  5. Rodríguez E. De la impresión a la activación en ortodoncia y ortopedia. Caracas: Amolca; 2011.p.155,166-168.

  6. Saadia M, Ahlin JH. Atlas de ortopedia dentofacial durante el crecimiento. Barcelona: Espaxs S.A.; 2000. p. 42, 73.

  7. Ladner PT, Muhl ZF. Changes concurrent with orthodontic treatment when maxillary expansion is a primary goal. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995; 108 (2): 184-193.

  8. Vinay C, Sandeep V, Hanumanth Rao CH, Uloopi K, Kumar A. Modified quad helix appliance for thumb sucking and cross bite correction. Contemp Clin Dent. 2013; 4 (4): 523-526.

  9. Cozza P, Giancotti A, Rosignoli L. Use of a modified quad helix in early interceptive treatment. J Clin Ortho. 2000; 34 (8): 473-476.

  10. Cozza P, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Mcnamara JA Jr. Treatment effects of a modified quad-helix in patients with dentoskeletal open bites. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2006; 129 (6): 734-739.

  11. Cozza P, Bacceti T, Franchi L, Mucedero M. Comparison of 2 early treatment protocols for open-bite malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007; 132 (6): 743-747.

  12. Merino-Arends M, Durán-Verges H. Quad-hélix: puesta al día. Ortodoncia Clínica. 2009; 12 (3): 140-161.

  13. Prakash A, Tandur AP, Rai S. Slow expansion in cleft patient with quad-helix. Indian J Dent Adv. 2012; 4 (1): 722-775.

  14. Bapat SM, Bhardwaj P, Singh A, Parasher N, Goel A. Biomex quad helix. OJN. 2015; 4 (2): 56-57.

  15. Urbaniak JA, Brantley WA, Pruhs RJ, Zussman RL, Post AC. Effects of appliance size, arch wire diameter, and alloy composition on the in vitro force delivery of the quad-helix appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988; 94 (4): 311-316.

  16. Martinelli F, Couto P, Ruellas A. Three palatal arches used to correct posterior dental crossbites. Angle Orthod. 2006; 76 (6): 1047-1051.

  17. Bench R. The quad helix appliance. Semin Orthod. 1998; 4 (4): 231-237.

  18. Cervera-Sabater A, Simón-Pardell M. Quad-helix. Biomecánica básica. Rev Esp Ortod. 2002; 32: 253-262.

  19. Azcona S, Giraudo B. Un versátil accesorio para ortodoncia fija, de simple fabricación en el laboratorio y sencillo manejo clínico quad-hélix. Impresiones Guía Dental de Córdoba. 2009; 4 (11): 16-18.

  20. Magnusson B, Koch G, Poulsen S. Odontopediatria. Barcelona: Salvat; 1985. p. 257.

  21. Yaseen SM, Acharya R. Hexa helix: modified quad helix appliance to correct anterior and posterior crossbites in mixed dentition. Case Rep Dent. 2012; 2012: 1-5.

  22. Bell RA, Kiebach TJ. Posterior crossbites in children: Developmental-based diagnosis and implications to normative growth patterns. Semin Orthod. 2014; 20 (2): 77-113.

  23. Conroy-Piskai C, Galang-Boquiren M, Obrez A, Viana M, Oppermann N, Sanchez F et al. Assessment of vertical changes during maxillary expansion using quad helix or bonded rapid maxillary expander. Angle Orthod. 2016; 86 (6): 925-933.

  24. Huynh T, Kennedy D, Joondeph D, Bollen A. Treatment response and stability of slow maxillary expansion using Haas, hyrax, and quad-helix appliances: A retrospective study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2009; 136 (3): 331-339.

  25. Vasant M, Menon S, Kannan S. Maxillary expansion in cleft lip and palate using quad helix and rapid palatal expansion screw. Med J Armed Forces India. 2009; 65 (2): 150-153.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev ADM. 2019;76