medigraphic.com
Academia Mexicana de Neurología, A.C.

2019, Number 4

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Neuroci 2019; 20 (4)

Practical considerations for integral approach of people with intellectual disabilities

Magaña-Gómez JA, Domínguez-Castro FA, Álvarez-Parra IY, Espinoza-Solís L, Angulo-Rojo CE, Castro-Pérez R, Duarte-De la Peña G

Language: English
References: 23
Page: 186-193
PDF size: 162.55 Kb.


ABSTRACT

People with some disability have worse health prognosis due to biological complications, inadequate access to health services, higher economic expenses, and difficulties in the communication of sensations and perceptions. Therefore, therapeutic strategies and the knowledge generated through scientific research are useful to improve their quality of life. This review addresses the most relevant issues for professionals who are interested in this field, offering the most accepted definition with its implications up to the description of the conditions that should be considered when giving a treatment, conducting research, raising public policies, modifying the health schemes, and availability of supports, among others. For this, the different domains of intellectual capacity, as well as the affected biological systems, are presented to carry out practical actions and generate objective knowledge that enhances the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities.


REFERENCES

  1. Lima-Rodríguez JS, Baena-Ariza MT, Domínguez-Sánchez I, Lima-Serrano M. Intellectual disability in children and teenagers: influence on family and family health. Systematic review. Enferm Clin. 2018;28:89-102.

  2. Havercamp SM, Scott HM. National health surveillance of adults with disabilities, adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and adults with no disabilities. Disabil Health J. 2015;8:165-72.

  3. Mundial B. Informe mundial la discapacidad. Educación. 2011;218:219.

  4. Fernández-López JA, Fernández-Fidalgo M, Geoffrey R, Stucki G, Cieza A. Funcionamiento y discapacidad: la clasificación internacional del funcionamiento (CIF). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009;83:775-83.

  5. NOM-015-SSA3-2012, Para la Atención Integral a Personas con Discapacidad, 015-SSA3-2012 Documents; 2012.

  6. Navas P, Verdugo M, Gómez L. Diagnóstico y clasificación en discapacidad intelectual. Psychosoc Interv. 2008;17:143-52.

  7. Üstün B. Disability and Culture: universalism and Diversity. Seattle: Hofgre and Huber; 2001.

  8. Schalock RL, Borthwick-Duffy SA, Bradley VJ, et al. Intellectual Disability: definition, Classification, and Systems of Supports. Arlington, VA: ERIC; 2010.

  9. Ladrón A, Álvarez M, Sanz L, Antequera J, Muñoz J, Almendro M. DSM- 5: novedades y Criterios Diagnósticos. 2013;205:20. Available from: http://www.codajic.org/sites/www.codajic.org/files/DSM%205%20%20 Novedades%20y%20Criterios%20Diagnósticos.pdf [Last access: 2018 Nov 18. Verified: 2019 Apr 5].

  10. Simms M. Intellectual and developmental disability. In: Kliegman RM, Lye PS, Brdini BJ, Toth H, Basel D, editors. Nelson Pedriatrics Symptom- Diagnosis. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 929.

  11. Videa P, de los Angeles R. Comprendiendo la discapacidad intelectual: datos, criterios y reflexiones. Rev Investig Psicol. 2016;15:101-22.

  12. Barrios JA, González-Gordon RG, Ruiz JP, et al. Evaluación médica y psicosocial de una población adulta con discapacidad intelectual. Rev Esp Salud Publica. 1999;73:383-92.

  13. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia. In: Geografia IN, editor. La Discapacidad en México, Datos al 2014. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia; 2016. p. 358.

  14. García CE, Sánchez AS. Clasificaciones de la OMS sobre discapacidad. Bol R Patronate Discapacidad. 2001;50:15-30.

  15. Muñoz-Quezada MT, Lucero Mondaca B. Evaluación de procedimientos para el diagnóstico de discapacidad intelectual en estudiantes con discapacidades múltiples. Ajayu Órgano Difusión Científica Dep Psicol UCBSP. 2017;15:34-52.

  16. Planagumà LV, Alsina RN, Llop RG, Vidal NR. In: Salut GD, editor. La Salud de Las Personas con Discapacidad Intelectual: ¿qué Debemos Tener en Cuenta? Guía Práctica Para Profesionales de la Salud. Ampans: Servei d’Imprenta; 2013.

  17. Martínez-Leal R, Salvador-Carulla L, Gutiérrez-Colosía MR, et al. La salud en personas con discapacidad intelectual en España: estudio Europeo POMONA-II. Rev Neurol. 2011;53:406-14.

  18. Matson JL, Cervantes PE. Comorbidity among persons with intellectual disabilities. Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2013;7:1318-22.

  19. Krause S, Ware R, McPherson L, Lennox N, O’Callaghan M. Obesity in adolescents with intellectual disability: prevalence and associated characteristics. Obes Res Clin Pract. 2016;10:520-30.

  20. Rimmer JH, Yamaki K, Lowry BM, Wang E, Vogel LC. Obesity and obesity-related secondary conditions in adolescents with intellectual/ developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54:787-94.

  21. van Ool JS, Snoeijen-Schouwenaars FM, Schelhaas HJ, et al. A systematic review of neuropsychiatric comorbidities in patients with both epilepsy and intellectual disability. Epilepsy Behav. 2016;60:130-7.

  22. Robertson J, Hatton C, Emerson E, Baines S. Prevalence of epilepsy among people with intellectual disabilities: a systematic review. Seizure. 2015;29:46-62.

  23. Petrovic BB, Peric TO, Markovic DL, et al. Unmet oral health needs among persons with intellectual disability. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;59:370-7.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com