medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Acta Médica Grupo Angeles

Órgano Oficial del Hospital Angeles Health System
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
    • Names and affiliations of the Editorial Board
  • Policies
  • About us
    • Data sharing policy
    • Stated aims and scope
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Acta Med 2019; 17 (3)

Application of preoperative appendicitis criteria as predictors of trans and postoperative complications

Saucedo MEM, Alabarda PAM, Rodríguez RMP, García PA, Bermúdez CD
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 9
Page: 207-210
PDF size: 137.04 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic appendectomy, open appendectomy, complicated appendicitis.

ABSTRACT

Acute appendicitis is one of the most common pathologies that need surgical management, and one of its most frequent complications is the development of appendiceal mass (10%), which results from appendiceal perforation, causing fever, leukocytosis and systemic symptoms. Material and methods: Retrospective, cross-sectional, descriptive study in which patients who underwent an appendectomy were included. All criteria were applied prior to a surgical event: 1) appendicular mass, 2) non-visualization of appendix, 3) delay of admission › 3 days and 4) CRP › 10 mg/dL. Results: A total sample of 57 patients. It was divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 14) patients with at least one positive predictive criterion and group 2 (n = 43) without any positive criteria, showed significant difference in the presence of complications, days of in-hospital stay and surgical conversion. COR curves to demonstrate the discriminative ability of the predictive criteria, were reasonable (AUC = 0.732, CI95% = 0.57-0.84) for days of in-hospital stay, with a sensitivity and specificity of 46.7 and 83.3%. Conclusions: Finding negative criteria can be a useful tool in making decisions between using laparoscopy or open surgery, as this will determine, secondarily, the intraoperative difficulty, as well as postoperative evolution.


REFERENCES

  1. Meshikhes AW. Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008; 12 (4): 767-775.

  2. Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 205 (1): 60-65.

  3. Garg CP, Vaidya BB, Chengalath MM. Efficacy of laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis. Int J Surg. 2009; 7 (3): 250-252.

  4. Deelder JD, Richir MC, Schoorl T, Schreurs WH. How to treat an appendiceal inflammatory mass: operatively or nonoperatively? J Gastrointest Surg. 2014; 18 (4): 641-645.

  5. Atema JJ, van Rossem CC, Leeuwenburgh MM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA. Scoring system to distinguish uncomplicated from complicated acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2015; 102 (8): 979-990.

  6. Saida F, Matsumoto S, Kitano M. Preoperative predictor of extensive resection for acute appendicitis. Am J Surg. 2018; 215 (4): 599-602.

  7. Wang X, Zhang W, Yang X, Shao J, Zhou X, Yuan J. Complicated appendicitis in children: is laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? A comparative study with the open appendectomy--our experience. J Pediatr Surg. 2009; 44 (10): 1924-1927.

  8. Quezada F, Quezada N, Mejia R, Brañes A, Padilla O, Jarufe N et al. Laparoscopic versus open approach in the management of appendicitis complicated exclusively with peritonitis: a single center experience. Int J Surg. 2015; 13: 80-83.

  9. Antonacci N, Ricci C, Taffurelli G, Monari F, Del Governatore M, Caira A et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy: Which factors are predictors of conversion? A high-volume prospective cohort study. Int J Surg. 2015; 21: 103-107.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Acta Med. 2019;17