medigraphic.com
ISSN 0035-0052 (Print)

2019, Number 3

Next >>

Rev Mex Pediatr 2019; 86 (3)

Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a tool for continuous education

Villasís-Keever MÁ, Pérez-Méndez A, Mendoza-Ibáñez OI

Language: Spanish
References: 13
Page: 91-93
PDF size: 145.11 Kb.


Text Extraction

No abstract.


REFERENCES

  1. Choudhry NK, Fletcher RH, Soumerai SB. Systematic review: the relationship between clinical experience and quality of health care. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 142(4): 260-273.

  2. Alderson P. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. BMJ. 2004; 328(7438): 476-477.

  3. Shinkins, B, Thompson, M, Mallett, S. Diagnostic accuracy studies: how to report and analyse inconclusive test results. BMJ. 2013; 346: f2778.

  4. Rosenfeld RM, Shiffman RN, Robertson P; Department of Otolaryngology State University of New York Downstate. Clinical Practice Guideline Development Manual, Third Edition: a quality-driven approach for translating evidence into action. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013; 148(1 Suppl): S1-S55.

  5. Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. A brief history of research synthesis. Eval Health Prof. 2002; 25(1): 12-37.

  6. Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, traductores. Manual Cochrane de Revisiones Sistemáticas de Intervenciones, versión 5.1.0 [actualizada en marzo de 2011] [Internet]. Barcelona: Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano; 2012. Disponible en http://www.cochrane.es/?q=es/node/269

  7. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K et al. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014; 312(2): 171-179.

  8. Ferreira-González I, Urrútia G, Alonso-Coello P. Revisiones sistemáticas y meta-análisis: bases conceptuales e interpretación. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2011; 64(8): 688-696.

  9. Livinsky A, Joubert D, Terry N. Undertaking a systematic review: What you need to know. 2015. Disponible en: https://www.nihlibrary.nih.gov/sites/default/files/SR_Training_oct2015.pdf

  10. Villasis-Keever MA, Rendón-Macías ME, Medina-Campos, RH. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in aging research. In: García-Peña, C, Gutiérrez-Robledo LM, Pérez-Zepeda MU, eds. Aging Research - Methodological Issues. Suiza: Springer International Publishing; 2018. pp. 143-155.

  11. Inzunza-Manjarrez, G, Pérez-Gaxiola, G, Medina-Rodríguez W. Aspiración traqueal en recién nacidos no vigorosos con probable síndrome de aspiración de meconio. Rev Mex Pediatr. 2019; 86(3): 104-107.

  12. Mora-Escallón D, Zapata-Ospina J.P, González-Avendaño S. Acetaminofén versus ibuprofeno para tratamiento del ductus arterioso persistente en pretérminos: una revisión sistemática de la literatura y metaanálisis. Rev Mex Pediatr. 2019; 86(3): 94-103.

  13. The Methods Group of the Campbell Collaboration. Methodological expectations of Campbell Collaboration intervention reviews: Conduct standards. Campbell Policies and Guidelines Series No. 3. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/18911803/homepage/author-guidelines




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com