medigraphic.com
Colegio de Medicina Interna de México.

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Med Int Mex 2019; 35 (5)

Gait and balance disorder in elderly adults and its relation to diabetes mellitus type 2

Corcuera-Ciudad R, Patiño-Villena AF, Paima-Olivari R, Chambergo-Michilot D, Parodi JF, Runzer-Colmenares FM

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 676-684
PDF size: 342.39 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective: To identify the association between diabetes mellitus type 2 and gait/ balance disorder in a retired military geriatric population.
Material and Method: A retrospective cohort study, database secondary analysis was done. Gait and balance disorder was evaluated in a population of retired military personnel from January 2010 to December 2015. An analysis was performed to assess the association of type 2 diabetes mellitus and gait and balance disorder with a Cox regression model, adjusted for age, sex, military rank, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, body mass index, polypharmacy, physical activity, physical performance and osteoarthritis.
Results: There were included 1422 retired military patients. The mean age was 77.9 ± 8.5 years. Older adults who had and had not diabetes mellitus 2 were 240 (16.8%) and 1182 (83.1%), respectively. A total of 794 (55.8%) patients had gait and balance disorder. Also, 50% of diabetic patients and 57% of non-diabetics had gait and balance disorder.
Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus 2 increases gait and balance disorder risk by 1.25 times.


REFERENCES

  1. Vincent JL, Opal SM, Marshall JC, Tracey KJ. Sepsis definitions: time for change. Lancet 2013;381(9868):774-5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61815-7.

  2. Bone RC, Balk R, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Chest 1992;101(6):1644-55. DOI: 10.1378/chest.101.6.1644

  3. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:801-10. doi:10.1001/ jama.2016.0287

  4. Kempker JA, Wang HE, Martin GS. Sepsis is a preventable public health problem. Crit Care 2018;22:116. doi: 10.1186/ s13054-018-2048-3.

  5. Muñana-Rodríguez JE, Ramírez-Elías A. Escala de coma de Glasgow: origen, análisis y uso apropiado. Enfermería Universitaria 2014;11(1):24-35. DOI: 10.1016/S1665- 7063(14)72661-2

  6. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304-377. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6.

  7. Seymour CW, Liu VX, Iwashyna TJ, et al. Assessment of clinical criteria for sepsis: for the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016;315:762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288.

  8. Park HK, Kim WY, Kim MC, et al. Quick sequential organ failure assessment compared to systemic inflammatory response syndrome for predicting sepsis in emergency department. J Crit Care 2017;42:12-17. doi: 10.1016/j. jcrc.2017.06.020.

  9. Sprung CL, Sakr Y, Vincent JL, et al. An evaluation of systemic inflammatory response syndrome signs in the Sepsis Occurrence in Acutely ill Patients (SOAP) study. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:421-427. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-0039-8

  10. Churpek MM, Zadravecz FJ, Winslow C, et al. Incidence and prognostic value of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome and organ dysfunctions in ward patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2015;192(8):958-64. doi: 10.1164/ rccm.201502-0275OC.

  11. Roa AC. The health system in Venezuela: a patient without medication? Cad Saúde Pública 2018;34(3):e00058517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00058517.

  12. Churpek MM, Snyder A, Han X, et al. Quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and early warning scores for detecting clinical deterioration in infected patients outside the intensive care unit. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195(7):906-911. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201604-0854OC.

  13. Herrea G. Evaluación del Score SOFA y el Quick SOFA para el diagnóstico de la sepsis en pacientes del Hospital Nacional Daniel Alcides Carrión, 2016. (Tesis para optar al título de Médico Cirujano). Consultado: 30-08-2018.

  14. Pedraza F, Monares E, Galindo C, et al. 200 días de qSOFA, detección temprana de sepsis y disminución del riesgo. Med Crit 2017;31(5):265-267.

  15. Osborn TM, Phillips G, Lemeshow S, et al. Sepsis severity score: an internationally derived scoring system from the surviving sepsis campaign database*. Crit Care Med 2014;42(9):1969-76. doi: 10.1097/ CCM.0000000000000416.

  16. Phillips GS, Osborn TM, Terry KM, et al. The New York Sepsis Severity Score: Development of a Risk-Adjusted Severity Model for Sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2018;46(5):674-683. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002824.

  17. Sartelli M, Abu-Zidan FM, Catena F, et al. Global validation of the WSES Sepsis Severity Score for patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections: a prospective multicentre study (WISS Study). World J Emerg Surg 2015;10:61. doi: 10.1186/s13017-015-0055-0. eCollection 2015.

  18. April MD, Aguirre J, Tannenbaum LI, et al. Sepsis clinical criteria in emergency department patients admitted to an intensive care unit: an external validation study of quick sequential organ failure assessment. J Emerg Med 2017; 52(5): 622-631. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.10.012.

  19. Serafim R, Andrade J, Salluh J, Póvoa P. A Comparison of the Quick-SOFA and Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria for the diagnosis of sepsis and prediction of mortality: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Chest 2018;153(3):646-655. doi: 10.1016/j. chest.2017.12.015




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com