medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Cirugía Plástica

ISSN 2992-8559 (Electronic)
ISSN 1405-0625 (Print)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
    • Send manuscript
  • Policies
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2018, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

Cir Plast 2018; 28 (2)

Neoformation of the nipple with two opposite «L» dermal fat flaps

Contreras MM, Barreda GMA
Full text How to cite this article 10.35366/CP182C

DOI

DOI: 10.35366/CP182C
URL: https://dx.doi.org/10.35366/CP182C

Language: Spanish
References: 19
Page: 55-62
PDF size: 412.99 Kb.


Key words:

Areola, nipple, reconstruction.

ABSTRACT

Nipple-areola complex is removed as part of the resected skin for a mastectomy, and the objective of its reconstruction is to achieve a position, symmetry, color, size, projection, and sensitivity similar to that of the healthy breast. No technique has been shown to be superior to another in a significant way, two stands out for maintaining a better projection of the neo-nipple, for simplicity and safety of their execution («ice skate» technique and flap in C-V). We suggest a new technique in the neoformation of the nipple with opposite double «L» dermal flaps. The objective is to compare a new technique of neoformation of the nipple with two techniques considered the gold standard in an experimental model. Six pigs of Vietnamese breed were used, in each one 2 neo-nipples of each technique were created (with areola and without areola). The follow-up was at 8 months and the results were compared with the ANOVA test. There were no statistically significant differences between the experimental technique (doublet «L» flaps) and the known techniques (C-V flap and «ice skate») for the preservation of the neo-nipple (p › 0.05). The «ice skating» technique was superior in the nipple projection (p ‹ 0.05) and the position of the neo-nipple and areola reconstruction influenced the «ice skate» and C-V flap techniques.


REFERENCES

  1. Castillo-Gutiérrez M, Ávila-Esquivel JF. Cáncer de mama: etapa clínica en la que se realiza el diagnóstico y tipos histológicos más frecuentes en mujeres que acuden a un hospital de segundo nivel. Arch Inv Mat Inf 2010; 2 (2): 85-90.

  2. Knaul FM, Nigenda G, Lozano R, Arreola-Ornelas H, Langer A, Frenk J. Cáncer de mama en México: una prioridad apremiante. Salud Pública Mex 2009; 51 Supl 2: S335-S344.

  3. Latarjet M, Ruiz-Liard A. Anatomía humana. 3ª ed. España: Panamericana; 1999. Vol. II, pp. 1779-1786.

  4. Neligan PC. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Elsevier; 2013. Vol. 5, pp. 1-12.

  5. Stephen JM, Cristiane MU. Plastic surgery. 2nd ed. Elsevier; 2006. Vol. VI, pp. 791-818.

  6. Shestak KC, Gabriel A, Landecker A, Peters S. Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (3): 780-786.

  7. Losken A, Mackay GJ, Bostwick J. Nipple reconstruction using the C-V flap technique: a long-term evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 108 (2): 361-369.

  8. Jabor MA, Shayani P, Collins Jr. DR, Karas T, Cohen BE. Nipple-areola reconstruction: satisfaction and clinical determinants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 110 (2): 457-463.

  9. Bernard RW, Beran SJ. Autologous fat graft in nipple reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112 (4): 964-968.

  10. Guerra AB, Khoobehi K, Metzinger SE, Allen RJ. New technique for nipple areola reconstruction: arrow flap and rib cartilage graft for long-lasting nipple projection. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50 (1): 31-37.

  11. Kim EK, Lee TJ. Use of lyophilized allogenic costal cartilage: is it effective to maintain the projection of the reconstructed nipple? Ann Plast Surg 2011; 66 (2): 128-130.

  12. Evans KK, Rasko Y, Lenert J, Olding M. The use of calcium hydroxyapatite for nipple projection after failed nipple-areolar reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55 (1): 25-29.

  13. Garramone CE, Lam B. Use of AlloDerm in primary nipple reconstruction to improve long-term nipple projection. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119 (6): 1663-1667.

  14. Nahabedian MY. Secondary nipple reconstruction using local flaps and AlloDerm. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115 (7): 2056-2061.

  15. Di Benedetto G, Sperti V, Pierangeli M, Bertani A. A simple and reliable method of nipple reconstruction using a spiral flap made of residual scar tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (1): 158-160.

  16. Hammond DC, Khuthaila D, Kim J. The skate flap purse-string technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (2): 399-406.

  17. Farhadi J, Maksvytyte GK, Schaefer DJ, Pierer G, Scheufler O. Reconstruction of the nipple-areola complex: an update. J Plast Reconstr Aesth Surg 2006; 59: 40-53.

  18. Tatlidede S, Yesilada AK, Egemen O, Bas L. A new technique in nipple reconstruction: dome technique with double pedicle. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 60 (2): 141-143.

  19. Weinfeld AB, Somia N, Codner MA. Purse-string nipple areolar reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 2008; 61 (4): 364-367.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Cir Plast. 2018;28