medigraphic.com
Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

salud publica mex 2019; 61 (5)

Correlates of secondhand smoke exposure in public and private settings in Mexico. Encodat 2016

Zavala-Arciniega L, Gutiérrez-Torres DS, Paz-Ballesteros WC, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Fleischer NL

Language: Spanish
References: 35
Page: 591-600
PDF size: 337.50 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Objective. To assess the correlates of secondhand smoke exposure (SHS) in public and private settings. Materials and methods. Data came from the 2016 National Survey of Drug, Alcohol and Tobacco use. Multilevel Poisson models were conducted to evaluate factors associated with SHS. Results. Having a higher education, being male and being a young adult were associated with higher SHS in bars and restaurants. Men had greater SHS at work, while women and adolescents had greater exposure at home. Adults older than 45 years had higher SHS on public transportation compared to adolescents between 12-17 years old. Conclusions. Exposure to SHS remains high and affects the population differentially. To reduce SHS, it is necessary to apply Article 8 of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


REFERENCES

  1. World Health Organization. 2016 global progress report on implementation of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Ginebra: WHO, 2016 [citado mayo 15, 2018]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/ fctc/reporting/2016_global_progress_report.pdf?ua

  2. Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Prüss-Ustün A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):139-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61388-8

  3. World Health Organization. Global report Mortality attributable to tobacco. Ginebra: WHO, 2012 [citado junio 6, 2018]. Disponible en: http:// whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2012/9789241564434_eng.pdf?ua=1

  4. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Convenio Marco de la OMS para el Control del Tabaco. Directrices sobre la protección contra la exposición al humo de tabaco, Ginebra: OMS, 2013 [citado junio 3, 2018]. Disponible en: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42813/1/9243591010.pdf

  5. World Health Organization. Directrices sobre la protección contra la exposición al humo de tabaco. [citado mayo 2, 2018]. Disponible en: http:// www.who.int/fctc/cop/art%208%20guidelines_spanish.pdf?ua

  6. Asamblea General de las Naciones Unidas. Proyecto de documento final de la Cumbre de las Naciones Unidas para la aprobación de la agenda para el desarrollo después de 2015. Nueva York: NU, 2015 [citado mayo 9, 2018]. Disponible en: http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc. asp?symbol=A/69/L.85&Lang=S

  7. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Ley General para el Control del Tabaco. México 2008 [citado febrero 15, 2017]. Disponible en: http://www. conadic.salud.gob.mx/pdfs/ley_general_tabaco.pdf

  8. Barrientos-Gutiérrez T. Evaluación científico-técnica de la Ley General para el Control del Tabaco en México. Salud Publica Mex. 2010:52(2);277- 82. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-36342010000800024

  9. Comunicación, Diálogo y Conciencia. Ciudades libres de humo de tabaco. Ciudad de México: CODICE, 2016 [citado noviembre 8, 2017]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321884137_Ciudades_ libres_de_humo

  10. Thrasher JF, Pérez-Hernández R, Swayampakala K, Arillo-Santillán E, Bottai M. Policy support, norms, and secondhand smoke exposure before and after implementation of a comprehensive smoke-free law in Mexico City. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1789-98. https://doi.org/10.2105/ AJPH.2009.180950

  11. Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Zavala-Arciniega L, Paz-Ballesteros WC, Gutiérrez-Torres DS, García-Buendía JC, Rodríguez-Andrade MA, et al. Encuesta Nacional de Consumo de Drogas, Alcohol y Tabaco 2016-2017: reporte de tabaco. Ciudad de México: INPRFM, 2017.

  12. Espelt A, Marí-Dellolmo M, Penelo E, Bosque-Prous M. Estimación de la Razón de Prevalencia con distintos modelos de Regresión: Ejemplo de un estudio internacional en investigación de las adicciones. Adicciones. 2017;29(2)105-12. https://doi.org/10.20882/adicciones.823

  13. Fong GT, Craig LV, Guignard R, Nagelhout GE, Tait MK, Driezen P, et al. Evaluating the effectiveness of france’s indoor smoke-free law 1 year and 5 years after implementation: findings from the ITC France survey. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66692. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066692

  14. Apsley A, Semple S. Secondhand smoke levels in Scottish bars 5 years on from the introduction of smoke-free legislation. Tob Control. 2012;21(5):511-3. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050107

  15. Weber MD, Bagwell DA, Fielding JE, Glantz SA. Long term compliance with California’s smoke-free workplace law among bars and restaurants in Los Angeles County. Tob Control. 2003;12(3):269-73. https://doi. org/10.1136/tc.12.3.269

  16. Edwards R, Thomson G, Wilson N, Waa A, Bullen C, O’Dea D, et al. After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand. Tob Control. 2008;17(1):e2. https://doi. org/10.1136/tc.2007.020347

  17. Mendes FL, Szklo AS, Perez CA, Cavalcante TM, Fong GT. Perceived enforcement of anti-smoking laws in bars and restaurants of three Brazilian cities: data from the ITC-Brazil survey. Cad Saúde Pública. 2017;33(3):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00140315

  18. Ferrante D, Linetzky B, Virgolini M, Schoj V, Apelberg B. Reduction in hospital admissions for acute coronary syndrome after the successful implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation in Argentina: a comparison with partial smoking restrictions. Tob Control. 2012;21(4):402-6. https:// doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.042325

  19. Asma S, Mackay J, Song SY, Zhao L, Morton J, Palipudi KM, et al. The GATS Atlas. Atlanta, GA: CDC Foundation, 2015 [citado mayo 29, 2018]. Disponible en: http://gatsatlas.org/pdf/mobile/index.html#p=18

  20. Blanco A, Sandoval R, Martínez-López L, Caixeta R. Diez años del Convenio Marco de la Organización Mundial de la Salud para el Control del Tabaco: avances en las Américas. Salud Publica Mex. 2017;59(1):117-25. https://doi.org/10.21149/8682

  21. Vardavas CI, Agaku I, Patelarou E, Anagnostopoulos N, Nakou C, Dramba V, et al. Ashtrays and signage as determinants of a smoke-free legislation’s success. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e72945. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0072945

  22. Barnoya J, Monzon JC, Briz P, Navas-Acien A. Compliance to the smoke-free law in Guatemala 5-years after implementation. BMC Public Health. 2016;12(16):318. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2960-x

  23. Wipfli HL, Samet JM. Second-hand smoke’s worldwide disease toll. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):101-2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140- 6736(10)61922-8

  24. Wipfli HL, Avila-Tang E, Navas-Acien A, Kim S, Onicescu G, Yuan J, et al. Secondhand smoke exposure among women and children: evidence from 31 countries. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(4):672-9. https://doi. org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126631

  25. Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública. Encuesta Global de Tabaquismo en Adultos. México 2015. Cuernavaca, México: INSP/OPS, 2017. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/tobacco/ surveillance/survey/gats/mex-report-2015-spanish.pdf

  26. Bonevski B, Paul C, Jones A, Bisquera A, Regan T. Smoky homes: gender, socioeconomic and housing disparities in secondhand tobacco smoke (SHS) exposure in a large population-based Australian cohort. Prev Med. 2014;60:95-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.12.024

  27. Fischer F, Kraemer A. Factors associated with secondhand smoke exposure in different settings: Results from the German Health Update (GEDA) 2012. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:327. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12889-016-3007-z

  28. Matsuyama Y, Aida J, Tsuboya T, Koyama S, Sato Y, Hozawa A, Osaka K. Social Inequalities in Secondhand Smoke Among Japanese Non-smokers: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Epidemiol. 2018;28(3):133-139. https://doi. org/10.2188/jea.JE20160184

  29. Lee JT, Agrawal S, Basu S, Glantz SA, Millett C. Association between smokefree workplace and second-hand smoke exposure at home in India. Tob Control. 2014;23(4):308-12. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050817

  30. Abdullah AS, Driezen P, Sansone G, Nargis N, Hussain G, Quah A, Fong J. Correlates of exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) at home among non-smoking adults in Bangladesh: findings from the ITC Bangladesh survey. BMC Pulm Med. 2014;14:117. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2466-14-117

  31. Hajizadeh M, Nandi A. The socioeconomic gradient of secondhand smoke exposure in children: evidence from 26 low-income and middle-income countries. Tob Control. 2016;25(e2):e146-55. https://doi. org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052828

  32. Nazar GP, Lee JT, Arora M, Millett C. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Secondhand Smoke Exposure at Home and at Work in 15 Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):1230-9. https:// doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntv261

  33. Vander-Weg M, Cunningham C, Howren M, Cai X. Tobacco use and exposure in rural areas: Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Addict Behav. 2011;36(3):231-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. addbeh.2010.11.005

  34. Singh A, Sahoo N. Urban–rural differentials in the factors associated with exposure to second-hand smoke in India. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11):e003542. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003542

  35. Reynales-Shigematsu LM. Tobacco and cancer: epidemiology and new perspectives of prevention and monitoring in Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2016;58(2):251-60. https:// doi.org/10.21149/spm.v58i2.7794




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com