González-Padilla E, Lassala A, Pedernera M, Gutiérrez CG

Language: English/Spanish
References: 23
Page: 1-17
PDF size: 179.46 Kb.

ABSTRACT

Beef cattle breeding has developed in extensive grazing systems in Mexico, concerning the livelihood of over one million families and affecting the use of natural resources. The diversity of climate, region, land tenure, herd size and poverty level potentially influence livestock farming. To detect areas of opportunity in the use of human, animal and natural resources, and to determine the degree of technological penetration, a structured questionnaire was administered as personal interviews to 3280 producers. Over 50% of farmers have an activity other than cattle breeding, mostly raising crops and other livestock. Weaned calves, primarily destined for the national market, are the foremost commercial product. Nevertheless, 20% of farmers in the northern region export their calves. European X Zebu crossbred cattle are widespread (over 45% of operations), followed by Bos taurus taurus breeds (22%). Criollo and predominantly Zebu cattle are present in ‹15% of farms, and dairy breeds in ‹5%. Over 70% of producers declared to select animal breed based on productive traits and adaptability, even though only 52% have record-keeping systems. The customary method to register data is hand-written, and ‹ 7% of producers use computers. Recorded information comprises data on reproduction (59.1%), calves (44%), herd health practices (32%) and purchases and sales (28%). Over 95% of farmers identify animals by hot iron marks and National Individual Livestock Identification System (SINIIGA) ear tags. Close to 52% of animal breeders do not receive technical advice. Finally, according to producers, the main constraints for farm growth and profitability were lack of access to credit, followed by low market value of their products and insufficient infrastructure.

REFERENCES

1. González-Padilla E, Magaña-Virgen M, Contreras-Rodríguez S, Valencia- Salazar E. Superficies dedicadas a la ganadería en México: su aportación de energía metabolizable actual y potencial, carga animal y balances energéticos para rumiantes domésticos y equinos por zonas y entidades. Anales de la Academia Veterinaria Mexicana. 1980;23-57.

2. Estadísticas del Medio Ambiente, México 1994. 1ª ed. México: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e informática; 1995.

3. Villegas Durán G, Bolaños Medina A, Olguín Prado L. La ganadería en México. 1ª ed. México: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM, Plaza y Valdés; 2001.

4. Livestock on grazing lands. FAO. 2014. Available from: www.fao.org/docrep/ x5304e/x5304e03.htm.

5. Panunzi E. Are grasslands under threat? Brief analysis of FAO statistical data on pasture and fodder crops. FAO; 2008. Available from: http://www.fao.org/ag/ portal/agp/agp-news/detail/en/c/6896/

6. Alcázar Godoy J. Ley Agraria de 1915 y Ley Agraria vigente: modelos paralelos de tenencia de la tierra. Estudios Agrarios. Revista de la Procuraduría Agraria, 2016;61:161-92.

7. Beef 2007-08. Beef Cow-calf Management Practices in the United States, 2008. USDA, Available from: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/ monitoring-and-surveillance/nahms/nahms_beef_cowcalf_studies

8. Padrón de beneficiarios PROGAN 2009. SAGARPA. Available from: https:// www.google.com/search?q=progan+2009&rlz=1C1CHBD_esMX767MX- 767&oq=progan+2009&aqs=chrome..69i57.10199j0j4&sourceid=- chrome&ie=UTF-8#

9. VSN International. Genstat for Windows. 19th ed. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International; 2017.

10. García E. Modificaciones al Sistema de clasificación climática de Koppen. 5ª ed. México: Instituto de Geografía, UNAM; 2004.

11. Índice de marginación municipal. Consejo Nacional de Población, 2013. Available from: http://www.conapo.gob.mx/es/CONAPO/ Indices_de_Marginacion_Publicaciones

12. Encuesta Nacional de Ocupación y Empleo (ENOE), población de 15 años y más de edad. INEGI, 2012. Available from: http://www.beta.inegi.org.mx/ proyectos/enchogares/regulares/enoe/

13. Diagnóstico del sector rural y pesquero. SAGARPA- FAO. 2012. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-bc980s.pdf

14. SIAP-SAGARPA. 2018. Estadísticas Agropecuarias. Available from: https://www. gob.mx/cms/uploads/attachment/file/392425/Serie_Hist_rica_exportaci_n_ de_Bovinos_agosto-_2018.pdf

15. Padrón Ganadero Nacional (PGN) 2018. SAGARPA-CNOG. Available from: http://www.pgn.org.mx/_documents/EstadisticaPGNBovinos.pdf

16. Alonso-Díaz MA, Corro-Morales MD, Lassala A, González-Padilla E, Gutiérrez CG. Cow-calf management practices in Mexico: Dual-purpose systems [unpublished].

17. SARH-México. Plan Nacional Ganadero 1976-1982. México: SARH; 1977.

18. Roman Ponce S, Ríos Utrera A, Montaño Bermúdez M, Garcia Ruiz A, Sifuentes Rincón AM, Martínez Velázquez G, et al. Mejoramiento genético de los bovinos del trópico. En: Estado del arte sobre investigación e innovación tecnológica en ganadería bovina tropical. Capítulo 4. 2ª ed. México: Red de Ganadería Tropical, UNAM, INIFAP. CONACyT; 2018. p. 130-92.

19. Informe de actividades 2018-2019 del Consejo Directivo de la Confederación Nacional de Organizaciones Ganaderas a la LXXXIII Asamblea General Ordinaria, Oaxaca, Oax. México. p. 17. May, 2019. Available from: www.cnog.org.mx

20. VIII Censo Nacional Agropecuario, Ganadero y Forestal 2007. INEGI. 2009. Available from: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/Agro/ca2007/ resultados_agricola/presentacion.aspx

21. Programa Nacional de fomento a la producción sostenible de forrajes. SAGAR, INIFAP produce. September, 1996. México.

22. González-Padilla E. Animal production in México: Constraints, problems and researchable topics. Livestock Regional Assessment Workshop, IICA- SR- CRSP; 1997. p. 15-8.

23. González Rebeles C, Palma Garcia JM, Silva Cassani N, Gómez Fuentes T, Galindo Maldonado F. Recursos naturales y ganadería en el trópico. En: Estado del arte sobre investigación e innovación tecnologica en ganadería bovina tropical. Capítulo 1. 2ª ed. México: Red de Ganadería Tropical, UNAM, INIFAP. CONACYT; 2018. p. 44-58.