medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-2937 (Print)

2019, Number 3

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc 2019; 25 (3)

Percutaneous intervention in multivessel coronary artery disease. Follow up to two years

Aldama PLI, Naranjo DAA, Hernández NM, García HRA, Aroche AR, Cuba RAL

Language: Spanish
References: 15
Page:
PDF size: 517.73 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: Multivessel coronary artery disease is a frequent diagnosis in patients with ischemic heart disease. Percutaneous coronary interventionism is a revascularization´s method used in this condition.
Objective: to determine the evolution of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous interventionism.
Method: A prospective longitudinal and descriptive study, in 130 patients from both genders with multivessel coronary artery disease revascularized by interventionism percutaneous, with a follow-up period of two years.
Results: the average age in patients studied was 72,8 ± 7,2 years, predominantly males (62, 9%). The cardiovascular risk factors higher prevalence was hypertension (65,0%) and dyslipidemia (53,2%). Was obtained a 91,5% success in the therapeutic procedures with revascularization of all territories ischemic in the 63,3%. The overall mortality was 6.2%. The incidence of myocardial not fatal and thrombosis stent was 4,6% and 5,4% respectively. Syntax score ≥ 33 associated to low-free survival cardiovascular events adverse.
Conclusions: patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated by interventionism percutaneous, showed a favorable evolution with low incidence of adverse events during follow-up.


REFERENCES

  1. Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. Ginebra, Suiza: OMS; c2018 [citado 20 de marzo 2019]. Enfermedades cardiovasculares, datos y cifras; [aprox. 17 pantallas]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cardiovascular-diseases-(cvds)

  2. Cuba. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Dirección Nacional de Estadísticas. Anuario Estadístico de Salud 2018 [Internet]. La Habana: MINSAP; 2019 [citado 20 de marzo 2019]. Disponible en: Disponible en: http://bvscuba.sld.cu/anuario-estadistico-de-cuba/

  3. Hueb W, Lopes N, Gersh BJ, Soares PR, Ribeiro EE, Pereira AC. Ten-year follow-up survival of the Medicine, Angioplasty, or Surgery Study (MASS II): A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3 therapeutic strategies for multivessel coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010 [citado 22 de enero de 2019]; 122:949–957. Disponible en https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.911669?url_ver=Z39.882003pubmed

  4. Head SJ, Milojevic M, Daemen J, Ahn JM, Boersma E, Christiansen EH. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet.2018 [citado 20 de marzo de 2019]; 391:939–948. Disponible en: https://www.clinicalkey.es/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0S01406736104239?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com

  5. Head SJ, Davierwala PM, Serruys PW, Redwood SR, Colombo A, Mack MJ, et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with three-vessel disease: final five-year follow-up of the SYNTAX trial. European Heart Journal [Internet]. 2 de octubre de 2014 [citado 22 de enero de 2019]; 35(40):2821-30. Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehu213

  6. Farooq V, Serruys PW. Bypass Grafting Versus Percutaneous Intervention—Which Is Better in MultivesselCoronary Disease: Lessons From SYNTAXand Beyond. PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES 58 (2015) 316–334.

  7. Farooq V, van Klaveren D, Steyerberg EW, Meliga E, Vergouwe Y, Chieffo A, et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II.Lancet2013;381:639–650

  8. Escaned J, Collet C, Ryan N, De Maria GL, Walsh S, Sabate M, et al. Clinical outcomes of state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients withde novothree vessel disease:1-year results of the SYNTAX II study. European Heart Journal (2017)38, 3124–3134

  9. Park SJ, Ahn JM, Kim YH, Park DW, Yun SC, Lee JY, et al. Trial of Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Coronary Disease. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1204-12

  10. Serruys P, Garg S. Intervencionismo coronario percutáneo para todos los pacientes con enfermedad coronaria compleja: enfermedad de tres vasos o del tronco izquierdo. ¿Verdadero? ¿Falso? ¿No se sabe? Rev Esp Cardiol. 2009;62(7):719-25

  11. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, Alfonso F, Banning AP, Benedetto U, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. The Task Force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) European Heart Journal (2019)40, 87–165.

  12. Chang M, Ahn JM, Whan Lee C, Cavalcante R, Sotomi Y, Onuma Y, et al. Long-Term Mortality After Coronary Revascularization in Nondiabetic Patients With Multivessel Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;68:29–36

  13. Farkouh ME, Domanski M, Sleeper LA, Siami FS, Dangas G, Michael Mack M, et al. Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;367:2375-84.

  14. Lee SY, Garcia-Garcia HM, Kuku K, Azizi V, Steinvil A, Rogers T, et al. Impact of Incomplete Revascularization in Diabetes Mellitus Patients with Multivessel Disease Treated with Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. 2016 JACC; 68(18): Suppl B109-B110.

  15. Hirshfeld JW, Fiorilli PN. Coronary Bypass Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Left Main and Multivessel Disease Incremental Data—How Do We Apply It? JACC: CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS 2016; 9(24):2490.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com