medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Cubana de Investigaciones Biomédicas

ISSN 1561-3011 (Electronic)
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd 2019; 38 (1)

Clinical and electrophysiological correlation in patient with optic neuritis

Chang ALA, Delgado SI, Querts MO, Sagaró CN
Full text How to cite this article

Language: English
References: 12
Page: 1-8
PDF size: 245.39 Kb.


Key words:

optic neuritis, visual evoked potentials, electrophysiological parameters.

ABSTRACT

A descriptive and traverse study was performed in patients with diagnosis of optic neuritis, that attended to the neuro ophthalmology service of the ophthalmological center, at the Santiago General Hospital "Dr. Juan Bruno Zayas Alfonso ", from the province of Santiago de Cuba, with less than a week of evolution of the disease, and visual acuity greater than 0.3, cooperatives and without refractive opacities, or neuro ophthalmologic diseases, during the period from December 2017 to November 2018. Ophthalmological clinical evaluations and electrophysiological studies of visual evoked potentials to pattern reversal, at diagnosis and eight weeks of evolution were carried out.
Objective: To identify the relationship possible between the electrophysiological parameters obtained by visual evoked potentials with the ophthalmological clinical evaluation.
Results: alterations predominantly of the parameters of latency and duration of the visual evoked potentials, in relation to the impairment of the clinical evaluations explored.
Conclusions: The visual evoked potentials are an effective tool in diagnosis, and complement the clinical evaluation of patients with optic neuritis.


REFERENCES

  1. Pau D, Al Zubidi N, Yalamanchili S, Plant GT, Lee AG. Actualización sobre neuritis óptica (NO), asociación con esclerosis múltiple y neuromielitis óptica (NMO). Eye (2011) [citado 29 Mar 2015];25:833-842. Disponible en: http://www.intramed.net/contenidover.asp?contenidoID=76986

  2. Osborne, Benjamin MD and Laura J. Balcer MD. "Optic neuritis: Pathophysiology, clinical features, and diagnosis.2015 [citado 29 Enero 2017]; Disponible en: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/optic-neuritis-pathophysiology-clinical-features-and-diagnosis

  3. AbouZeid N and Bhatti MT. Acute inflammatory demyelinating optic neuritis. Neurologist 2008;14(4):207-223.

  4. Buompadre MC. Neuropatía óptica aguda: diagnósticos diferenciales. RevNeurol 2013 [citado 29 Enero 2017];57 (Supl 1): S139-47. Disponible en : https://www.neurologia.com/pdf/57S01/bkS01S139.pdf

  5. Rodriguez-Mena D, Almarcegui C, Dolz I, Herrero R, Bambo MP, Fernandez J, et al. Electropysiologic evaluation of the visual pathway in patients with multiple sclerosis. J ClinNeurophysiol. 2013;30(4):376-81.

  6. Howell OW, Rundle JL, Garg A, Komada M, Brophy PJ, Reynolds R. Activated microglia mediate axoglial disruption that contributes to axonal injury in multiple sclerosis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2010. [citado 29 enero 2017];69(10):1017-1033. Disponible en; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4335193/

  7. Contreras Bulnes R, Jiménez-Sierra M. Análisis comparativo de la respuesta visual evocada por flash y patrones en la neuritis óptica. Rev. Mexicana de Oftalmología 2013 [citado 29 enero 2017];87(4):220-224. Disponible en: http://appswl.elsevier.es/publicaciones/item/pdf/watermark?idApp=UINPBA00004N&piiItem=X0187451913687420&origen=zonadelectura&web=zonadelectura&urlApp=http://www.elsevier.es&estadoItem=S300&idiomaItem=es

  8. Suppiej A, gaspa g, Cappellari A, et al. The role of visual evoked potential in differential diagnosis of functional Visual Loss and optic Neuritis in Children. J Child Neurol 2011;26(1):58-64.

  9. Cheng H, Laron M, Schiffman JS, Tang RA, Frishman LJ The relationship between visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer measurements in patients with multiple sclerosis.InvestOphthalmol Vis Sci 2007;48(12):5798-805

  10. Gómez-Hurtado Cubillana A, Merino Suárez M, Piñero Llorens D, LariaOchaíta C, Pérez-Cambrodí RJ. Neuritis óptica en la población pediátrica. Acta Estrabológica .2013 [citado 12 Mar 2016];42(2). Disponible en: https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/36995/1/2013_Gomez-Hurtado_etal_ActaEstrabologica.pdf

  11. Whatham AR, Nguyen V, Zhu Y, Hennessy M, Kalloniati M. The value of clinical electrophysiology in the assessment of the eye and visual system in the era of advanced imaging. ClinExpOptom. 2014;97(2):99-115

  12. Klistorner A, Arvind H, Garrick R, et al. Interrelationship of optical coherence tomography and multifocal visual evoked potentials after optic neuritis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010 [citado 12 Mar 2016]; 51(5):2770-2777. Disponible en: http://iovs.arvojournals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2186472




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Cubana Invest Bioméd. 2019;38