medigraphic.com
ISSN 2305-7939 (Electronic)

2019, Number 2

<< Back Next >>

RCU 2019; 8 (2)

History and current situation of lumboscopic approach in urology

Ochoa GY, Rodríguez GY, González LT

Language: Spanish
References: 53
Page: 164-174
PDF size: 869.52 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: In 1969 the urologists began to take their first steps in retroperitoneoscopic surgery, and in the past years many successful reports of this approach have been published. It has been used since 1999 at the Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso (National Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery) in Cuba for the surgical treatment of the upper urinary tract. Objective: To revise the historic and current aspects of the lumboscopic approach in the field of Urology. Methods: A revision of the bibliographic data bases Pubmed/Medline, Scielo, Cochrane, Cumed and Lilacs was carried out, utilizing the retroperitoneal space descriptors, urology, minimally invasive surgical procedures and laparoscopy. The information gathered was analyzed and the scientific articles published between 1992 and 2018 related to the topic and the aim of the revision were selected. Conclusions: The lumboscopic approach has brought great advantages to urologic minimally invasive surgery. Minilaparoscopy, robotic assistance and retroperitoneoscopy in an already rising association result in a promising blend of benefits.


REFERENCES

  1. Cerulo M, Escolino M, Turra F, Roberti A, Farina A, Esposito C. Benefits of Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Pediatric Urology. Curr Urol Rep. 2018; 19(5):33. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11934-018-0777-0

  2. González León T. Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Different Techniques and Approaches. Curr Urol Rep. 2015; 16(2):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-014-0476-4

  3. Gaur DD. Retroperitoneoscopy: the balloon technique. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1994 [citado 04/02/2019]; 76(4):259-63. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC25022 47/

  4. González León T, Machado Álvarez M, Rodríguez Verde E, Suárez Marcillán ME, Bautista Olivé J. Empleo de la cirugía lumboscópica en pacientes atendidos en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso. Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar. 2012 [citado 04/02/2019]; 41:151-9. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttex t&pid=S0138-65572012000200005&nrm=iso

  5. Srivastava A, Sureka SK, Vashishtha S, Agarwal S, Ansari MS, Kumar M. Single-centre experience of retroperitoneoscopic approach in urology with tips to overcome the steep learning curve. J Minim Access Surg. 2016 [citado 04/02/2019]; 12(2):102-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM C4810941/

  6. Saifee Y, Nagarajan R, Qadri SJ, Sarmah A, Kumar S, Pal BC, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidneys: Training and outcome. Indian J Urol. 2016 [citado 23/02/2019]; 32(4):301-5. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM C5054662/

  7. Machado Álvarez M, González León T, Olive González JB, Nodal Ortega J, Quintana Pajon I, Sánchez EC. Anestesia en procedimientos lumboscópicos: Experiencia en el Centro Nacional de Cirugía de mínimo acceso. Rev Cubana Anestesiol Reanim. 2011 [citado 23/02/ 2019]; 10:122-34. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_abstra ct&pid=S1726- 67182011000200006&lng=pt&nrm=iso

  8. Jacobeaus HC. Uber die Möglichkeit die Zystoskopie bei Untersuchung seröser Höhlungen anzuwenden. Münch Med Wschr. 1910; 57:2090-2.

  9. Bartel M. Retroperitoneoscopy. An endoscopic method for inspection and bioptic examination of the retroperitoneal space. Zentralbl chir. 1969; 94:377.

  10. Wickham J. The surgical treatment of renal lithiasis. In: Wickham J, editor. Urinary Calculus Disease. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1979: 45-98.

  11. Gaur DD, Agarwal DK, Purohit KC. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1993; 149:103.

  12. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Dunkin BJ, Flowers JL, Schweitzer E, Cangro C, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Mayland 3-year experience. J Urol. 2000 [citado 23/02/2019]; 164:1494-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67014- 0

  13. Gill IS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 1998;25:343.

  14. Hoznek A, Salomón L, Antiphon P, Radier C, Hafiani M, Chopin DK, et al. Partial nephrectomy with retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Urol. 1999 [citado 23/02/2019]; 162:1922-6. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/105695 38

  15. Rassweiler JJ, Seemann O, Frede T, Henkel TO, Alken P. Retroperitoneoscopy: experience with 200 cases. J Urol. 1998; 160(4):1265-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)62512- 6

  16. Gill IS, Dayman RV, Albala DM, Aso Y, Chiu AW, Clayman RV, et al. Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology. 1998[citado 23/02/2019]; 52:566-71. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/976307 2

  17. Janetschek G, Peschel R, Altarac S, Bartsch G. Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Urology. 1996 [citado 23/02/2019]; 47(3):311-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80444- 0

  18. Gajbhiye R, Tirpude BH, Bhanarkar H, Fidvi A, Shamkuwar A. Study of laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty. International surgery journal. 2015 [citado 23/02/2019]; 2(1):53-9. Disponible en: https://www.ijsurgery.com/index.php/isj/articl e/view/483

  19. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Gupta DK, Kumar V, Pandey M, Akhtar A. Prospective randomized comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty and retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. JSLS. 2014[citado 23/02/2019]; 18(3):e2014.00366. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC42089 07/

  20. Subotic S, Weiss H, Wyler S, Rentsch CA, Rassweiler J, Bachmann A, et al. Dismembered and non-dismembered retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children. World J Urol. 2013; 31(3):689-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0887-0

  21. Sinha RJ, Jhanwar A, Singh V, Prakash G. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty for the management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction in horseshoe kidney: our initial experience. BMJ case reports. 2016 [citado 23/02/2019]; 2016. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC49569 80/

  22. Lombardo R, Martos R, Ribal MJ, Alcaraz A, Tubaro A, De Nunzio C. Retroperitoneoscopy in urology: a systematic review. Minerva Urol Nefrol. 2019; 71(1):9-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23736/S0393- 2249.18.03235-6

  23. Ng CS, Gill IS, Sung GT, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic surgery is not associated with increased carbon dioxide absorption. J Urol. 1999 [citado 03/03/2019]; 162:1268-72. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/104921 77

  24. Escovar Díaz PA, García Sanz JL, Escovar La Riva PE, Rodríguez Escovar FP, Escobar A, Pacheco MR, et al. Nefrectomía endoscópica retroperitoneal. Arch Esp Urol. 2002 [citado 03/03/2019]; 55(6):697-712. Disponible en: http://aeurologia.com/file.php?d=articlesf&f=0 03b34bc1d358e0641f5283a2d67615403ac6738 -es.pdf

  25. Elmaraezy A, Abushouk AI, Kamel M, Negida A, Naser O. Should hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy replace the standard laparoscopic technique for living donor nephrectomy? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2017; 40:83-90. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.018

  26. Klop KW, Kok NF, Dols LF, Dor FJ, Tran KT, Terkivatan T, et al. Can right-sided hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy be advocated above standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a randomized pilot study. Transpl Int. 2014;27(2):162-9. DOI: http://doi.org.10.1111/tri.12226

  27. Takayuki H, Kiyohiko H, Daiki I, Hiroshi H, Ken M, Tatsu T, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Comparison of Early Complication, Donor and Recipient Outcome with Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy. J Endourol. 2018; 32(12):1120-4. DOI: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/ end.2018.0669

  28. Ng ZQ, Musk GC, Rea A, He B. Transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic approach for live donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc. 2017[citado 03/03/2019]; 32(6): 2793-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5981-3

  29. Antoniou D, Karetsos C. Laparoscopy or retroperitoneoscopy: which is the best approach in pediatric urology? Transl Pediatr. 2016 [citado 03/03/2019];5(4):205-13. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC51073 81/

  30. Oktar T, Sanli O, Acar O, Tefik T, Karakus S, Ziylan O. Retroperitoneoscopic ablative renal surgery in children:the feasibility of using three trocars. Urol J. 2014 [citado 03/03/ 2019];10(4):1040-5. Disponible en: http://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/urolj/index.php/uj/a rticle/view/1399/804

  31. Escolino M, Riccipetitoni G, Yamataka A, Mushtaq I, Miyano G, Caione P, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy in children: a multicentric international comparative study between lateral versus prone approach. Surg Endosc. 2018; 33(3):832-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6349-z

  32. Esposito C, Escolino M, Corcione F, Draghici IM, Savanelli A, Castagnetti M, et al. Twentyyear experience with laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in children: considerations and details of technique. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30(5):2114-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4472-7

  33. Esposito C, Escolino M, Miyano G, Caione P, Chiarenza F, Riccipetitoni G, et al. A comparison between laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic approach for partial nephrectomy in children with duplex kidney: a multicentric survey. World J Urol. 2016;34(7):939-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1728-8

  34. Abraham MK, Viswanath N, Bindu S, Ramakrishnan P. Retroperitoneoscopic Surgery in Children-An Overview. JIMSA. 2014 [citado 30/03/2019]; 27:108-10. Disponible en: http://medind.nic.in/jav/t14/i2/javt14i2p108.p df

  35. Parrilli A, Roberti A, Escolino M, Esposito C. Surgical approaches for varicocele in pediatric patient. Transl Pediatr. 2016 [citado 30/03/2019]; 5(4):227-32. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC51073 84/

  36. Gaur DD, Gopischand M, Dubey M, Jhunjhunwala V. Mini-access for retroperitoneal laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2002 [citado 30/03/2019]; 12:313-5. DOI: https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/ 109264202320884045

  37. Pérez-Lanzac A, García-Baquero R. Minilaparoscopy in urology: Systematic review. Actas Urol Esp. 2018 [citado 30/03/2019]; 42(5):299-308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acuro.2017.07.008

  38. Dubeux VT, Carrerette F, Pecanha G, Medeiros L, Gabrich P, Milfont J, et al. Minilaparoscopy in urology: initial results after 32 cases. World J Urol. 2016; 34(1):137-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1602-8

  39. Jarzemski P, Listopadzki S, Kalinowski R, Kowalski M, Jarzemski M, Sosnowski R. Minilaparascopic dismembered pyeloplasty using only 3 mm instruments (3 mmML). Cent European J Urol. 2015 [citado 30/03/2019];68(3):396-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC46437 07/

  40. Breda A, Castellan P, Freitas RA, Schwartzmann I, Álvarez Osorio JL, Amon- Sesmero JH, et al. Renal and Adrenal Minilaparoscopy: A Prospective Multicentric Study. Urology. 2016 [citado 30/03/2019]; 92:44-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.02.048

  41. Rassweiler J, Klein J, Goezen AS. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic non-dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels: A matchedpaired analysis and review of literature. Asian J Urol. 2018 [citado 30/03/2019]; 5(3):172-81. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/PMC60331 99/

  42. Pini G, Goezen AS, Schulze M, Hruza M, Klein J, Rassweiler JJ. Small-incision access retroperitoneoscopic technique (SMART) pyeloplasty in adult patients: comparison of cosmetic and postoperative pain outcomes in a matched-pair analysis with standard retroperitoneoscopy: preliminary report. World J Urol. 2012; 30(5):605-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0740-x

  43. Al Nasser M, Pini G, Gozen AS, Elashry OM, Akin Y, Klein J, et al. Comparative study for evaluating the cosmetic outcome of smallincision access retroperitoneoscopic technique (SMART) with standard retroperitoneoscopy using the Observer Scar Assessment Scale: are small incisions a big deal?. J Endourol. 2014 [citado 30/03/2019]; 28:1409e-13e. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1089/end.2014.0142

  44. Porreca A, D'Agostino D, Dente D, Dandrea M, Salvaggio A, Cappa E, et al. Retroperitoneal approach for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: technique and early outcomes. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 [citado 30/03/2019];44(1):63-8. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PM C5815533/

  45. Kim HY, Choe HS, Lee DS, Yoo JM, Lee SJ. Extending the indication for robot-assisted retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy to antero lateral renal tumors. Int J Med Robot. 2017 [citado 30/03/2019]; 13(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1755

  46. Anderson BG, Wright BJ, Potretzke AM, Figenshau RS. Retroperitoneal access for robotic renal surgery. Int Braz J Urol. 2018 [citado 30/03/2019]; 44(1):200-1. Disponible en: http://www.intbrazjurol.com.br/videosection/ 20160633_anderson_et_al

  47. Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT, Lee HJ, Berquist SW, Hassan AS, et al. Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol. 2017 [citado 30/03/2019]; 35(11):1721-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2062-0

  48. Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramírez D, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, Rogers CG, et al. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Posterior Tumors Through a Retroperitoneal Approach Offers Decreased Length of Stay Compared with the Transperitoneal Approach: A Propensity- Matched Analysis. J Endourol. 2017; 31(2):158- 62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0603

  49. Maurice MJ, Ramírez D, Kaouk JH. Robotic Laparoendoscopic Single-site Retroperitioneal Renal Surgery: Initial Investigation of a Purposebuilt Single-port Surgical System. Eur Urol. 2017; 71(4):643-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.005

  50. García García A, González León T. Simple Enucleation for Renal Tumors: Indications, Techniques, and Results. Curr Urol Rep. 2016; 17(1):7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934- 015-0560-4

  51. González León T, Moreira M, Bautista Olivé DJ, Suárez Marcillán ME, Perdomo Leyva D, Rodríguez-Ojea L, et al. Cirugía laparoscópica de los tumores del urotelio del tracto urinario superior. Rev Cubana Urol. 2015 [citado 30/03/2019]; 4(1):5-14. Disponible en: http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/a rticle/view/221/242

  52. González León T, Morera Pérez M. Renal Cancer in the Elderly. Curr Urol Rep. 2015; 17(1):6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934- 015-0562-2

  53. González León T, Suárez Marcillán ME, Cuza Herrera Y, Tegegne A, de la Paz Pérez Y, Rodríguez-Ojea L. Cirugía Laparoscópica para el tratamiento de la litiasis del uréter lumbar. Rev Cubana. 2016 [citado 30/03/2019]; 5(1):17-29. Disponible en: http://www.revurologia.sld.cu/index.php/rcu/article




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com