medigraphic.com
ISSN 2174-0798 (Print)
Organo oficial de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Odontopediatría (ALOP)

2018, Number 1

<< Back Next >>

Rev Odotopediatr Latinoam 2018; 8 (1)

Ectodermal dysplasia in pediatric dentistry

Danelon M, Dalpasquale G, Gonzalez GLS, Gonçalves EN, Báez-Quintero LC, Botazzo DAC

Language: Spanish
References: 22
Page: 75-82
PDF size: 964.35 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Ectodermal dyspasia (ED) is a hereditary disease that includes genetic and environmental changes. ED causes hypodontia, dystrophic nails, sparse hair and dental anomalies. Oral rehabilitation treatment for pediatric patients with ED is difficult because of continuous development and craniofacial growth. The aim of this study was to present a case report of oral rehabilitation in pediatric patients diagnosed with ED. A 5- year, 6-month-old girl reported to the clinic of Pediatric Dentistry in University Anhanguera UNIDERP-BR. Extraoral examination showed that the patient was an oral breather, and presented with decreased lower face height, protruding and everted lips, prominent forehead, “horse saddle” nose, lack of hair, eyelashes and eyebrows, thin and dry skin. Intraoral examination demonstrated absence of teeth: 51/52, 61/62/63, 71/72, 81/82 and tree conical teeth: 53, 73 and 83. The radiographic examination revealed agenesis of 9 primary teeth and of the buds of the following permanent teeth: 11/12/13, 21/22/23, 41/42, 31/32, we observed the presence of teeth buds of 33 and 43. Considering physical and radiographic characteristics hydrotic ectodermal was diagnosed. As clinical management, we opted for the installation of removable functional aesthetic maintainers, favoring the speech normality, swallowing, lip and lingual muscle tone and social development.


REFERENCES

  1. Freire-Maia N, Pinheiro M. Ectodermal dysplasias: a clinical and genetic study. Am J Hum Genet. 1985; 37:1234.

  2. Visinoni AF, Lisboa-Costa T, Pagnan NAB., et al. Ectodermal Dysplasias: clinical and Molecular Review. Am J Med Genet. A 2009; 149A: 1980-2002.

  3. Guazzarotti L, Tadini G, Mancini GE, et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity and mutational spectrum in a cohort of 45 Italian males subjects with X-linked ectodermal dysplasia. Clin Genet. 2015; 87: 338–342.

  4. Wang Y, He J, Decker AM, Hu JC, et al. Clinical outcomes of implant therapy in ectodermal dysplasia patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 45: 1035–1043.

  5. Clouston HR. The .major forms of hereditary ectodermal dysplasia (with an autopsy and biopsie on the anhydrotic type). Can Med Assoc J. 1939; 40: 1-7.

  6. Trídico LA, Antonio JR, Pozetti EMO, et al. Clouston Syndrome: 25 year follow up of a patient. An Bras Dermatol .2015; 90: 897-9.

  7. Yang R, Hu Z, Kong Q, et al. A known mutation in GJB6 in a large Chinese family with hidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. J Europ Acad of Dermatol and Venereol. 2016; 30: 1362-5.

  8. Van Sickels JE, Raybould TP, Hicks EP. Interdisciplinary Management of Patients with Ectodermal Dysplasia. Journal of Oral Implantol. 2010; 36: 239-45.

  9. Alencar NA, Reis KR, Antonio AG, et al. Influence of Oral Rehabilitation on the Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of a Child with Ectodermal Dysplasia. J Dent Child. 2015; 82: 36-40.

  10. Calleaa M, Cammarata-Scalisib F, Willoughbyc CE, et al. Estudio clínico y molecular en una familia con displasia ectodérmica hipohidrótica autosómica dominante. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2017; 115: e34-e38.

  11. Lind LK, Stecksén-Blicks C, Lejon K, et al. EDAR mutation in autosomal dominant hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in two Swedish families. BMC Med Genet. 2006; 7: 80.

  12. Gaczkowska A, Abdalla EM, Dowidar KM, et al. De novo EDA mutations: Variable expression in two Egyptian families. Arch Oral Biol. 2016; 68: 21-8.

  13. Tarjan I, Gabris K, Rozsa N. Early prosthetic treatment of patients with ectodermal dysplasia: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93: 419-24.

  14. Maroulakos G, Artopoulou II, Angelopoulou MV, et al. Removable partial dentures vs overdentures in children with ectodermal dysplasia: two case reports. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2016; 17: 205-10.

  15. Vilanova LSR, Sánchez-Ayala A, Ribeiro GR, et al. Conventional Complete Denture in Patients with Ectodermal Dysplasia. Case Rep Dent. 2015; 2015: 1-4.

  16. Deshmukh S, Prashanth S. Ectodermal Dysplasia: A Genetic Review. Int J of Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012; 5 197-202.

  17. Mittal M, Srivastava D, Kumar A, et al. Dental management of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia. A report of two cases. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015; 6: 414-7.

  18. Bhalla G, Agrawal KK, Chand P, et al. Effect of Complete Dentures on Craniofacial Growth of an Ectodermal Dysplasia Patient: A Clinical Report. J Prosthodont. 2013; 22: 495-500.

  19. Trivedi BD, Bhatia R. Complete and Removable Partial Prosthesis for a Child with Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013; 6: 71-4.

  20. Aydinbelge M, Gumus HO, Sekerci AE, et al. Implants in Children with Hypohidrotic Ectodermal Dysplasia: An Alternative Approach to Esthetic Management: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Pediatr Dent. 2013; 35: 441-46.

  21. Bryant SR. The effects of age, jaw site, and bone condition on oral implant outcomes. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11: 470-90.

  22. Imirzalioglu P, Uckan S, Haydar SG. Surgical and prosthodontic treatment alternatives for children and adolescents with ectodermal dysplasia: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88: 569-72.




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com