medigraphic.com
ISSN 1561-3194 (Electronic)

2019, Number 5

<< Back Next >>

Rev Ciencias Médicas 2019; 23 (5)

Theoretical-methodological foundations on risk management associated with nursing care to the critically-ill patients

Hernández LY, Casanova MMC, Sánchez PCF, Rodríguez LM, Ferro GB

Language: Spanish
References: 34
Page: 772-786
PDF size: 274.69 Kb.


ABSTRACT

Introduction: the scientific development regarding the medical technology achieved in recent years, the multiple procedures and invasive techniques to which patients are subjected during their stay in intensive care units, associated with risks and adverse events. In a general sense, the role of nursing professionals is considered of vital importance in this topic, especially in the ICU, where they can contribute in an efficient and effective way to the management of health care risks.
Objective: to base the theoretical-methodological and ethical referents of risk management associated with nursing care in Intensive Care Units.
Methods: in the research Materialistic-Dialectic method was applied as the main one. In the theoretical order, the method of historical-logical analysis was analyzed applying theoretical-methodological and ethical references of the risk management process related to the nursing care of patient, as well as the analysis-synthesis and induction-deduction procedures.
Development: the term risk management was conceptualized, determining the stages, importance and role of nursing in the development of this process, establishing the relationship with the principles of ethics and bioethics.
Conclusions: clinical risk management in emergency care is an important methodological tool for the early identification and management of such events, a space in which nursing personnel play an essential role, with deep ethical and bioethical implications in the act of caring.


REFERENCES

  1. Xunta de Galicia Servicio Gallego de Salud. Sistema de Seguridad del Paciente y Gestión de Riesgos Sanitarios. [Internet] Santiago de Compostela; 2014.

  2. Kelly D, Kutney-Lee A, Lake ET. The critical care work environment and nurse-reported health care–associated infections. Am J CritCare [internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(6): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3996829/

  3. Zoboli ELCP, Schveitzer MC. Nursing values as social practice: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(3): [aprox. 8p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692013000300695&lng=en

  4. Araújo FP, Ferreira MA. Social representations of care humanization in the conception of hospitalized users. RevBrasEnferm [Internet]. 2011 [citado 28/01/2019]; 64(2): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-12902013000300016

  5. Da Silva RC, de Assunção Ferreira M, Apostolidis T, Sauthier M. Nursing care practices in intensive care: An analysis according to ethics of responsibility. Esc. Anna Nery [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 20(4). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?pid=S1414-81452016000400212&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en

  6. Del Río Sánchez MB. Manual de Cuidados Enfermeros en la UCI. Madrid: Editorial SEP; 2017. p.13-38

  7. Barbosa SFF, Mello JF. Cultura de segurança do paciente em terapia intensiva: recomendações da enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enfermagem [Internet]. 2013 [citado 28/01/2019]; 33(1124). Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-07072013000400031

  8. Lacoma F. Seguridad del paciente crítico: la cultura de seguridad más allá de la UCI. Rev Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2008 [citado 28/01/2019]; 23(4): [aprox. 30p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-articulo-seguridad-del-paciente-critico-cultura-S1134282X08721250

  9. Martínez López FJ, Ruiz Ortega JM. Manual de gestión de riesgos sanitarios. Madrid: Ediciones Díaz de Santos; 2001. p. 226-8.

  10. Gómiz León E. El profesional de enfermería, por la gestión del riesgo, hacia la seguridad del paciente. RevSocEspEnfermNefrol [eInternet]. 2007 [citado 28/01/2019]; 10(1): [aprox. 1p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/nefro/v10n1/carta.pdf

  11. León Román CA. La seguridad del paciente, una responsabilidad en el acto del cuidado. Rev Cubana Enferm [Internet]. 2006 [citado 28/01/2019]; 22(3): [aprox 11 p.]. Disponible en: http://bvs.sld.cu/revistas/enf/vol22_3_06/enf07306.html

  12. Mora Guillart L. Los principios éticos y bioéticos aplicados a la calidad de la atención en enfermería. Rev Cubana Oftalmol [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 28(2): [aprox. 5p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-21762015000200009&lng=es

  13. Gómez Córdoba AI, Espinosa AF. Dilemas éticos frente a la seguridad del paciente. Cuidar es pensar. Aquichan [Internet]. 2009 [citado 28/01/2019]; 6(1). Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/80/165

  14. Vera Carrasco O. Aspectos bioéticos en la atención de los pacientes de las unidades de cuidados intensivos. Rev. Méd [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(1). Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-89582015000100009

  15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Respect for autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, justice. En: Beuchamp TL, Childress JF, editors. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford UniversityPress, 1994. P.120-394.

  16. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Pacientes en Defensa de su Seguridad [Internet] m OMO; 2019 [citado 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: http://www.who.int/patientsafety/patients_for_patient/statement/es/index.html

  17. Santos-Pérez MI, García-Rodicio S, Abajo del Álamo C. Conocimiento de los tratamientos en pacientes hospitalarios: herramienta necesaria para la seguridad asistencial. Rev Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 27(5): [aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-articulo-conocimiento-los-tratamientos-pacientes-hospitalarios-S1134282X12000085

  18. Vargas MAO, Ramos FRS. Iatrogenesis in Intensive Care Units: dramatization of contemporary bio/ethical problems. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2010 [citado 28/01/2019]; 18(5): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692010000500021&lng=en

  19. Duarte SCM, Queiroz ABA, Büscher A, Stipp MAC. Human error in daily intensive nursing care. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 23(6): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692015000601074&lng=en

  20. Sholtz S, Nel EW, Poggenpoel M, Myburgh C. The culture of nurses in a critical care unit. Glob Qual Nurs Res [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 3. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2333393615625996

  21. Almeida Barcellos R, Toscan M, PrettoBáo AC, Coelho AmestoyS. Effectiveness of clinical risk management in intensive care. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(1-8). Disponible en: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/download/45205/pdf_1

  22. Gómez Córdoba AI, Fernanda Espinosa A. Ethical Dilemmas Facing the Patient's Safety: Care means Ponder. Aquichan [Internet]. 2009 [citado 28/01/2019]; 68(1). Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/80/165

  23. Escobar-Castellanos B, Cid-Henríquez P. El cuidado de enfermería y la ética derivados del avance tecnológico en salud. Acta bioeth [Internet]. 2018 [citado 28/01/2019]; 24(1). Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2018000100039 - B25

  24. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System [Internet]. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000 [citado 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077248 25. Ward JR, Clarkson PJ. An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions. J MedEngTechnol [Internet]. 2004 [citado 28/01/2019]; 28(1): [aprox. 9p.]. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0309190031000123747 26. Mattox E. Medical Devices and Patient Safety. CritCare Nurse [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 32(4): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/content/32/4/60.full

  25. Institute ECRI. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013.Health Devices [enlínea]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 41(11). Disponible en: https://www.ecri.org/Resources/Whitepapers_and_reports/2013_Health_Devices_Top_10_Hazards.pdf

  26. Santos-Pérez MI, García-Rodicio S, Abajo del Álamo C. Conocimiento de los tratamientos en pacientes hospitalarios: herramienta necesaria para la seguridad asistencial. Rev Calidad Asistencial [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 27(5): [aprox. 4p.]. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-calidad-asistencial-256-articulo-conocimiento-los-tratamientos-pacientes-hospitalarios-S1134282X12000085

  27. Vargas MAO, Ramos FRS. Iatrogenesis in Intensive Care Units: dramatization of contemporary bio/ethical problems. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2010 [citado 28/01/2019]; 18(5): [aprox. 10p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692010000500021&lng=en

  28. Duarte SCM, Queiroz ABA, Büscher A, Stipp MAC. Human error in daily intensive nursing care. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem [Internet]. 2015 [citado 28/01/2019]; 23(6): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692015000601074&lng=en

  29. Sholtz S, Nel EW, Poggenpoel M, Myburgh C. The culture of nurses in a critical care unit. Glob Qual Nurs Res [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 3. Disponible en: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2333393615625996

  30. Almeida Barcellos R, Toscan M, PrettoBáo AC, Coelho AmestoyS. Effectiveness of clinical risk management in intensive care. Cogitare Enferm [Internet]. 2016 [citado 28/01/2019]; 21(1-8). Disponible en: https://revistas.ufpr.br/cogitare/article/download/45205/pdf_1

  31. Gómez Córdoba AI, Fernanda Espinosa A. Ethical Dilemmas Facing the Patient's Safety: Care means Ponder. Aquichan [Internet]. 2009 [citado 28/01/2019]; 68(1). Disponible en: http://aquichan.unisabana.edu.co/index.php/aquichan/article/view/80/165

  32. Escobar-Castellanos B, Cid-Henríquez P. El cuidado de enfermería y la ética derivados del avance tecnológico en salud. Acta bioeth [Internet]. 2018 [citado 28/01/2019]; 24(1). Disponible en: https://scielo.conicyt.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-569X2018000100039 - B25

  33. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Quality of Health Care in America. To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System [Internet]. Washington: National Academies Press; 2000 [citado 28/01/2019]. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077248 25. Ward JR, Clarkson PJ. An analysis of medical device-related errors: prevalence and possible solutions. J MedEngTechnol [Internet]. 2004 [citado 28/01/2019]; 28(1): [aprox. 9p.]. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0309190031000123747 26. Mattox E. Medical Devices and Patient Safety. CritCare Nurse [Internet]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 32(4): [aprox. 6p.]. Disponible en: http://ccn.aacnjournals.org/content/32/4/60.full

  34. Institute ECRI. Top 10 health technology hazards for 2013.Health Devices [enlínea]. 2012 [citado 28/01/2019]; 41(11). Disponible en: https://www.ecri.org/Resources/Whitepapers_and_reports/2013_Health_Devices_Top_10_Hazards.pdf




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com