medigraphic.com
SPANISH

Revista Mexicana de Urología

Organo Oficial de la Sociedad Mexicana de Urología
  • Contents
  • View Archive
  • Information
    • General Information        
    • Directory
  • Publish
    • Instructions for authors        
  • medigraphic.com
    • Home
    • Journals index            
    • Register / Login
  • Mi perfil

2019, Number 6

<< Back Next >>

Rev Mex Urol 2019; 79 (6)

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Initial experience at the Centro Oncológico Estatal ISSEMYM, Toluca

Costilla-Montero A, López-García AL, García-Martinez FE, Padilla-Piña J, Padilla-Mota I, Rosalez-Velazquez CE, Dolores-Velazquez R
Full text How to cite this article

Language: Spanish
References: 21
Page: 1-10
PDF size: 720.57 Kb.


Key words:

Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, Oncologic center.

ABSTRACT

Aim: To present our initial experience in the development of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy at the Centro Oncológico Estatal ISSEMyM in Toluca, State of Mexico, Mexico.
Materials and methods: A retrospective, descriptive study was conducted. All laparoscopic radical nephrectomies performed due to kidney tumor diagnosis at the Centro Oncológico Estatal ISSEMyM, within the time frame of 2013-2018, were retrospectively evaluated.
Results and discussion: During the study period, 58 patients were retrieved that underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Tumor size was from 1.5 to 12 cm, with a mean size of 5.77 cm. The conversion rate was 12.06%, 4 cases of which were due to uncontrolled bleeding from the renal hilum. Mean surgery duration per procedure was 165.2 minutes. Mean intraoperative blood loss was 369.82 ml. There were 4 complications (6.89%), 3 of which were classified as Clavien-Dindo II and one as Clavien-Dindo III. Three of the tumors were larger than 7 cm, thus the complications were possibly related to tumor size. Mean hospital stay was 1.94 days, ranging from 1 to 7 days. Three patients (5.17%) presented with recurrence.
Conclusions: Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is an excellent technique for oncologic control, with the advantages of minimally invasive surgery. Given the similar intraoperative and postoperative results of our initial experience from 2013 to the present and those of other national and international hospitals, that approach will continue to be offered to our patients.


REFERENCES

  1. Castillo C O, Sánches-Salas R, Vidal M I, Albino D G, Díaz C M, Vitagliano G, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Our experience in 150 consecutives patients. Revista chilena de cirugía. 2008 Aug;60(4):297–302. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.4067/S0718-40262008000400006.

  2. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Feb;66(1):7–30. doi: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21332

  3. Aldaco-Sarvide F, Pérez-Pérez P, Cervantes- Sánchez G, Torrecillas-Torres L, Erazo- Valle-Solís AA, Cabrera-Galeana P, et al. Mortalidad por cáncer en México: actualización 2015. cáncer. 2018;85:1. doi: https://doi. org/10.24875/j.gamo.M18000105

  4. Solares E, Martínez F, Jiménez-Rios MÁ. Nefrectomía radical laparoscópica en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. Rev Mex Urol. 2011;71(6):338–44.

  5. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Meretyk S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic Nephrectomy: Initial Case Report. The Journal of Urology. 1991 Aug 1;146(2, Part 1):278– 82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022- 5347(17)37770-4

  6. Wein K, Novick P. Campbell-Walsh Urología 10a, Title: Campbell-Walsh Urologia/Campbell- Walsh Urology (Spanish Edition) Author: Alan J. Wein, Louis R, MD. 2012;3367–8.

  7. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwal N. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: kidney cancer 3.2019. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;

  8. Kerkebe L M, Olivares G R, Orellana S N, Iturriaga V C, Gutierrez M E, Vallejos A T, et al. Nefrectomía radical laparoscópica en el tratamiento del carcinoma de células renales: análisis de los primeros 50 casos. Revista chilena de cirugía. 2006 Apr;58(2):127–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718- 40262006000200009

  9. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol. 2001 Jul;166(1):6–18.

  10. Rossi SH, Klatte T, Usher-Smith J, Stewart GD. Epidemiology and screening for renal cancer. World J Urol. 2018 Sep 1;36(9):1341–53. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2286-7

  11. Pierorazio Phillip M., Johnson Michael H., Patel Hiten D., Sozio Stephen M., Sharma Ritu, Iyoha Emmanuel, et al. Management of Renal Masses and Localized Renal Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Urology. 2016 Oct 1;196(4):989–99. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.04.081

  12. Choueiri TK, Motzer RJ. Systemic therapy for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. New England Journal of Medicine. 2017;376(4):354–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1601333

  13. Wang D, Xiao Z, Shou J, Li C, Xing N. Comparison of laparoscopy and open radical nephrectomy of renal cell cancer. Open Medicine. 2019;14(1):392–397. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1515/med-2019-0040

  14. Simone G, Gill IS, Mottrie A, Kutikov A, Patard J-J, Alcaraz A, et al. Indications, Techniques, Outcomes, and Limitations for Minimally Ischemic and Off-clamp Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. European Urology. 2015 Oct 1;68(4):632–40. doi: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.04.020

  15. Campos JG, Bravo E, Sedano A, Torres J, Hernández G, Estrada C. Experiencia de nefrectomía laparoscópica en el Hospital Central Militar. Rev Mex Urol. 2013;73:72–6.

  16. Solís Rodríguez JA, García Vásquez RA, Arriaga Aguilar J, Candia Plata M del C, Chavarría Guevara J. Nefrectomía radical. Comparación de resultados por técnica laparoscópica y abierta en el Hospital General del Estado de Sonora. Colegio Mexicano de Urología Nacional, AC. 2015;24.

  17. Rivera-Ramírez JA, Cendejas-Gómez JJ, Gabilondo-Pliego B, Rodríguez-Covarrubias F. Abordaje laparoscópico para el tratamiento quirúrgico de los tumores renales y del tracto urinario superior. Revista Mexicana de Urología. 2016 Sep;76(5):279–83. doi: https://dx.doi. org/10.1016/j.uromx.2016.06.002

  18. Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, Savage SS, Hobart MG, Sung GT, et al. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in 100 patients. Cancer. 2001;92(7):1843– 55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097- 0142(20011001)92:7%3C1843: :AIDCNCR1701% 3E3.0.CO;2-W

  19. Gill Inderbir S.*, Kavoussi Louis R., Clayman Ralph V., Ehrlich Richard, Evans Richard, Fuchs Gerhard, et al. Complications of Laparoscopic Nephrectomy in 185 Patients: A Multi-Institutional Review. Journal of Urology. 1995 Aug 1;154(2):479–83. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)67078-2

  20. Gong EM, Lyon MB, Orvieto MA, Lucioni A, Gerber GS, Shalhav AL. Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: Comparison of clinical Stage T1 and T2 renal tumors. UROLOGY. 2006 Dec 1;68(6):1183–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. urology.2006.08.1077

  21. Galisteo EG, Morales Jiménez P, Hernández Alcaraz D, Baena González V. Recidiva local del tumor renal. Actas Urológicas Españolas. 2009 Jan 1;33(5):603–8. doi: https://doi. org/10.1016/S0210-4806(09)74195-6




2020     |     www.medigraphic.com

Mi perfil

C?MO CITAR (Vancouver)

Rev Mex Urol. 2019;79